bringonUrban Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 That list is rediculous. They say the Ohio states defense was dominating so they obviously didn't watch the game. They carved up our secondary pretty good. Would say 1 toss /nu 2 mich. st 3 wisc Quote Link to comment
Enhance Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 We probably would have been bumped up at least one spot if we had registered a few more TFL's, maybe another sack or two, and not given up so many rushing yards. Quote Link to comment
Nobody Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 Rate us last... I welcome it. We earn our keep around here. 1 Quote Link to comment
Hooked on Huskers Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 tschu has 1. Michigan State 2. Nebraska 3. Ohio state 4. Michigan 5. Wisconsin True. Boise St. is tough year in and year out....Rodney Dangerfield type. The only question......... S.Miss gang is good or bad? Quote Link to comment
Excel Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 I hate to be the guy to say it because I love reading preseason rankings and yes, its been said a million times by others but.... One week in its very hard to tell where teams actually are. Sure team X beat team Y by 20 points but we don't get a real idea of what that win means until team Y plays team Z and so on and so on. If Boise loses every game this year then MSU looks pathetic, if they steam roll every team then the Spartans look a little better. When pressed I'd have to say, after one week; t1. Nebraska t1. Ohio State t3. Wisconsin t3. Michigan State 5. Purdue 6. Michigan 7. Illinois 8. Northwestern 9. Iowa 10. Penn State 11. Minnesota 12. Indiana The should be goods - OSU & NU Strong showing by unknowns - Illinois & Purdue The squeakers - Iowa, Michigan State, Northwestern, and Wisconsin The disappointments - Minnesota, Michigan, Penn State, Indiana Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 I'm very skeptical of this Boise State team. This isn't Alabama we're talking about, you just don't replace virtually your entire team and see no drop off. Michigan State could have easily lost that game too. Quote Link to comment
huskerfan333157 Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 I'm very skeptical of this Boise State team. This isn't Alabama we're talking about, you just don't replace virtually your entire team and see no drop off. Michigan State could have easily lost that game too. Its Nick Saban we are talking about. He is the best recruiter and the best coach by far. I watched that game and Bama has two amazing running backs that will be just as good as Trent Richardson and they are a freshman and a sophomore I think. Alabama will still be pretty dominant but will have a little drop off from last year's team, it wont be much of one though. Quote Link to comment
HuskerInLostWages Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 I have to give NU the nod for #1 here as they were never behind. OSU could have been behind by 14 points had the WR's been able to catch the ball. The kicker also shanked 2 kicks before OSU even crossed Miami's 50 yard line. Quote Link to comment
Brouhaha Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 This is just absolutely ridiculous. Quote Link to comment
sd'sker Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 It's hard to see how anyone with a hint of knowledge (my category) about football would have the Huskers that low. That being said, this time of the year it really means nothing. Injuries and maturity (growth on both sides of the ball) will make or break most teams by years end. it never means anything, that is the point. it is only about how the team should be ranked because of how they have played. osu, mich, mich. st., and wiscy: any and all of them could beat us; however, this week we played better than most if not all of them. that is the point of the power rankings and how it differs from actual rankings. it gives columnist the freedom to rank teams based on how they looked recently, not on their season or even potential. it is very subjective and there really is not much criteria. Quote Link to comment
deedsker Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 Deeds List of the BIG Dudes 1. Michigan St. 2. Nebraska 3. Ohio State 4. Michigan 5. Wisconsin 6. Purdue 7. Illinois 8. Northwestern 9. Iowa 10. Minnesota 11. Penn St. 12. Indiana Quote Link to comment
MSUFAN4320 Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 Yeah, I think #5 is a bit low for you guys. Based on what I saw over the weekend as well as "common knowledge" for each team I'd go: 1) MSU 2) Nebraska 3) Ohio State 4) Wisconsin 5) Michigan 6) Purdue 7) Illinois 8) Northwestern 9) Iowa 10) Minnesota 11) Penn State 12) Indiana I think OSU is talented, but that was still a middling team last year. They got to prove it to me by beating some good opponents with a new head coach. Quote Link to comment
HeyBurke Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 I'm very skeptical of this Boise State team. This isn't Alabama we're talking about, you just don't replace virtually your entire team and see no drop off. Michigan State could have easily lost that game too. Its Nick Saban we are talking about. He is the best recruiter and the best coach by far. I watched that game and Bama has two amazing running backs that will be just as good as Trent Richardson and they are a freshman and a sophomore I think. Alabama will still be pretty dominant but will have a little drop off from last year's team, it wont be much of one though. The Dude was saying that Boise State is no Alabama. With all the players that Boise lost after last season, they can't just reload and be just as good, like Alabama can. For that reason, Michigan State's win is even less impressive than it was to begin with (if you can even consider that an impressive win). 2 Quote Link to comment
deedsker Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 Yeah, I think #5 is a bit low for you guys. Based on what I saw over the weekend as well as "common knowledge" for each team I'd go: HAHA. My rankings weren't good enough so you duplicate them and change Wisconsin for good measure. Quote Link to comment
MSUFAN4320 Posted September 3, 2012 Share Posted September 3, 2012 Nah, I just went with what I thought. No way is Michigan better than Wisconsin. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.