knapplc Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 A recent comment by Landlord prompted this thread. Who has greater "ownership" of the team? Do current students, who are the peers of the players? Do alumni, who not only have been students but who have supported the team in the adulthood? What level of "ownership" do generic fans, who have never attended UNL have? What about boosters? Note - don't get hung up on the word "ownership." Note #2 - yes, it's the players' and coaches' team first. That's not what we're talking about here. Quote Link to comment
Comish Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 I would suggest swapping the term "ownership" for "investment", and then commence the discussion. Quote Link to comment
sd'sker Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 i think, as americans, we expect everything to be democratic. but i would say the team is the administrations' and it is to do with it as they see fit (i.e., what is best for the university). that or taxpayers, but taxpayers 'own' the administration and vest their trust in them. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 Cop out answer of "some combination". I'd say mostly "fans" which includes current students, alumni and others who've never had an official relationship with the school. Really "all of the above" is about the same. Not sure any one group has more stake than another. Quote Link to comment
Landlord Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 Students. Without the students, the university doesn't exist, and the team doesn't exist. They're the foundation that makes it possible, and they're the most loyal, vocal and dedicated fans. Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 The team's. We're just spectators. Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 I've always been under the assumption that football was the boosters'/alumni's sport and basketball was the students' sport. I dont know why, but it just always felt that way to me. Not just at Nebraska, but across athletics as a whole. Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 Students. The University is there for the students. The football team is part of the university. When I say "students", I am including the team since they are students also. Knapp, I think you and I were there around the same time when the student section was on the East side. It was much bigger than it is now. These students are the future boosters of the program. A dwindling student section does not bode well for future donations. I honestly remember sitting in seats around the 40-50 yard line as a student looking over at the west side hoping that some day I can have season tickets with as good of seating some day as an adult. Hmmm...still have yet to reach that goal. Quote Link to comment
QMany Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 This is a very difficult question. I'm having trouble answering it, especially since I am not an alumni. Students. Without the students, the university doesn't exist, and the team doesn't exist. They're the foundation that makes it possible, and they're the most loyal, vocal and dedicated fans. I will say that I don't necessarily agree with the bolded. Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 This is a very difficult question. I'm having trouble answering it, especially since I am not an alumni. Students. Without the students, the university doesn't exist, and the team doesn't exist. They're the foundation that makes it possible, and they're the most loyal, vocal and dedicated fans. I will say that I don't necessarily agree with the bolded. Especially since some students aren't even fans of the team. Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 This is a very difficult question. I'm having trouble answering it, especially since I am not an alumni. Students. Without the students, the university doesn't exist, and the team doesn't exist. They're the foundation that makes it possible, and they're the most loyal, vocal and dedicated fans. I will say that I don't necessarily agree with the bolded. Especially since some students aren't even fans of the team. Would you say aTm has a bigger student following of the team and are their students more involved with the game? LINK Watch the video. Heck, they even have yell practices with the students. These kids are the future financial backing of the program. Quote Link to comment
QMany Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 Students. Without the students, the university doesn't exist, and the team doesn't exist. They're the foundation that makes it possible, and they're the most loyal, vocal and dedicated fans. Without the alumni and boosters, Memorial Stadium and many other capital improvements don't exist. Those are also integral parts of the "University." I think it is a combination of all of those people. (Cop out answer). Quote Link to comment
Landlord Posted May 29, 2013 Share Posted May 29, 2013 Students. Without the students, the university doesn't exist, and the team doesn't exist. They're the foundation that makes it possible, and they're the most loyal, vocal and dedicated fans. Without the alumni and boosters, Memorial Stadium and many other capital improvements don't exist. Those are also integral parts of the "University." I think it is a combination of all of those people. (Cop out answer). Yes, it is a combination, I was taking the question to mean who's is it more than anybody elses? The alumni and boosters WERE students, and even with memorial and those improvements not existing, the team would still exist. Because of the university. Because of the students. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.