NUpolo8 Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 I'm just trying to figure out when we all started to call Memorial Stadium "The Bag". 2 Quote Link to comment
desertshox Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 I say 35 - 0. I see a shutout. GBR!!! Our defense is going to score 7 touchdowns? wut? Quote Link to comment
True2tRA Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 To be simple, I can see us winning this game and I wouldn't be shocked if we lose it. It's definitely not "in the bag". If young Tommy and this offense just make a few big plays, or at least well timed plays, this game could tilt to us though. I expect a lot from their defense, and I expect our defense to stop them as well. If we play mistake free, one big play could be the difference. I just get the feeling Enunwa might just be the guy that does it for us. I also expect to see that TE streak up the middle for a bug pass play finally. Quote Link to comment
MichiganDad3 Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 I hope TA plays the entire game. He always seems to get pulled when he is doing well, and when he returns, he has lost his mojo. Quote Link to comment
Dagerow Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 In this thread, I learned that drugs are bad, mmkay? Solid Quote Link to comment
skersfan Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 I never call it the bag, I have an old one at home!!!!! 1 Quote Link to comment
HuskerinSunDiego Posted November 15, 2013 Author Share Posted November 15, 2013 Folks, what are you so afraid of? Look at some of MSU's "huge" wins this year: MSU 26 Western Michigan 13 MSU 21 South Florida 6 (The same 3-6 South Florida that lost to McNeese State, 53-21) MSU 13 Notre Dame 17 (Woops, this was a loss. The same Notre Dame that beat Michigan at Michigan by 11) MSU 26 Iowa 14 (Nuff said) MSU 42 Indiana 28 MSU 14 Purdue 0 (Yes, the same Purdue that we beat by 37. The same Purdue that lost to Northern Illinios 55-24) I'm certainly not suggesting that we get lazy and presume we'll win. All I'm saying is that there is NOTHING on MSU's schedule that warrants the accolades they have been receiving. They could easily have a losing record. They are not a power at all. Sorry, we'l win, banged up offense or not. Quote Link to comment
Landlord Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 I'm certainly not suggesting that we get lazy and presume we'll win. That's... no. That is exactly what you are doing, actually. Quote Link to comment
scarletNcream Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 I like to OP's positive attitude for once. Why can't we win this. Look at the schedules and the results. Both teams have played 9 games. Of that 4 teams have winning records. One out of conference MSU opponent Youngstown State still has to play SDSU and another is 1-9 (Western Michigan) to Southern Miss 0-9. Nebraska and Michigan State are very similar. The one thing they have going for them is their defense with no offense, or up and coming to be fair, too our offense and our up and coming defense. Would I put Tommy Armstrong over Connor Cook? ANYDAY. I ask only that Beck NOT throw the quick hit to the receiver on any down. Tommy can't get the ball out there fast enough and MSU's corners are too fast and probably will not be playing soft. Quote Link to comment
MSUFAN4320 Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 I'm glad you folks are confident. I would expect nothing less from a proud fan base. The Michigan week was boring, because 99% of them thought their team would lose. Here's to a good and injury-free game! 2 Quote Link to comment
Chaddyboxer Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 I'm glad you folks are confident. I would expect nothing less from a proud fan base. The Michigan week was boring, because 99% of them thought their team would lose. Here's to a good and injury-free game! I hope for the same. Good luck! Quote Link to comment
BIGREDIOWAN Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 I'm glad you folks are confident. I would expect nothing less from a proud fan base. The Michigan week was boring, because 99% of them thought their team would lose. Here's to a good and injury-free game! We aren't very confident honestly, but here's to a good game regardless. Quote Link to comment
NUpolo8 Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 I'm glad you folks are confident. I would expect nothing less from a proud fan base. The Michigan week was boring, because 99% of them thought their team would lose. Here's to a good and injury-free game! Well unfortunately for you.....the gloves are off. Look around at a few of the topics you'll see the impending doom MSU is destined to saunter into. That's right. 1/900th of the people there are all but guaranteed to be WAVING TOWELS. There might be a few more doing it too. You just won't know until gameday. Husker fans keep you guessing that way. 1 Quote Link to comment
ADS Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 I'm glad you folks are confident. I would expect nothing less from a proud fan base. The Michigan week was boring, because 99% of them thought their team would lose. Here's to a good and injury-free game! +1 Quote Link to comment
SpartanMacks Posted November 15, 2013 Share Posted November 15, 2013 I like to OP's positive attitude for once. Why can't we win this. Look at the schedules and the results. Both teams have played 9 games. Of that 4 teams have winning records. One out of conference MSU opponent Youngstown State still has to play SDSU and another is 1-9 (Western Michigan) to Southern Miss 0-9. Nebraska and Michigan State are very similar. The one thing they have going for them is their defense with no offense, or up and coming to be fair, too our offense and our up and coming defense. Would I put Tommy Armstrong over Connor Cook? ANYDAY. I ask only that Beck NOT throw the quick hit to the receiver on any down. Tommy can't get the ball out there fast enough and MSU's corners are too fast and probably will not be playing soft. TA works better in NU's offense, CC works better in MSU's offense. I don't think either of us would want to trade QBs. Nebraska needs more running ability and offensive firepower than Cook would provide. MSU just wants someone who can manage the game, and TA would be on the bench very quickly if he kept turning the ball over the way he has. Different philosophies, different skillsets. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.