Returning Starters

[Mavric]

Per Phil Steele, the number of returning starters for each B1G team plus other Husker opponents:

 

1. Purdue 16

2. Rutgers 15

T3. Nebraska 14

T3. Penn State 14

T5. Indiana 13

T5. Michigan 13

T5. Minnesota 13

T5. Wisconsin 13

T9. Illinois 12

T9. Iowa 12

T9. Maryland 12

12. Northwestern 11

13. Michigan State 10

14. Ohio State 6

Other Opponents:

Fresno State 12

Wyoming 18

Oregon 11

 

Link

[Waterloohusker26]

Per Phil Steele, the number of returning starters for each B1G team plus other Husker opponents:

 

1. Purdue 16

2. Rutgers 15

T3. Nebraska 14

T3. Penn State 14

T5. Indiana 13

T5. Michigan 13

T5. Minnesota 13

T5. Wisconsin 13

T9. Illinois 12

T9. Iowa 12

T9. Maryland 12

12. Northwestern 11

13. Michigan State 10

14. Ohio State 6

Other Opponents:

Fresno State 12

Wyoming 18

Oregon 11

 

Link

 

Besides DT the starters we have to replace won't take much

[NUance]

Per Phil Steele, the number of returning starters for each B1G team plus other Husker opponents:

 

1. Purdue 16

2. Rutgers 15

T3. Nebraska 14

T3. Penn State 14

T5. Indiana 13

T5. Michigan 13

T5. Minnesota 13

T5. Wisconsin 13

T9. Illinois 12

T9. Iowa 12

T9. Maryland 12

12. Northwestern 11

13. Michigan State 10

14. Ohio State 6

Other Opponents:

Fresno State 12

Wyoming 18

Oregon 11

 

Link

 

Not sure if it's coincidental, or it means something. But that list is pretty close to an upside down ranking of the B1G.

[Huskerzoo]

 

Per Phil Steele, the number of returning starters for each B1G team plus other Husker opponents:

 

1. Purdue 16

2. Rutgers 15

T3. Nebraska 14

T3. Penn State 14

T5. Indiana 13

T5. Michigan 13

T5. Minnesota 13

T5. Wisconsin 13

T9. Illinois 12

T9. Iowa 12

T9. Maryland 12

12. Northwestern 11

13. Michigan State 10

14. Ohio State 6

Other Opponents:

Fresno State 12

Wyoming 18

Oregon 11

 

Link

 

Besides DT the starters we have to replace won't take much

 

 

I'm really liking the roster turnover this year. I'm sad we lost out on VV especially if firing our DL coach earlier would've kept him, but so it goes. I do like our up and coming line talent on both ends of the ball though.

[MichiganDad3]

Losing Cross and Jano will hurt. It would have hart more if they weren't under utilized last year.

[Minnesota_husker]

In Purdue's case, 16 people returning is probably not a good thing.

[RedRedJarvisRedwine]

In Purdue's case, 16 people returning is probably not a good thing.

Except.......ya know, they beat us and all that jazz.

[Spooky Tooth]

Cross and Jano were given huge roles last year particularly compared to how the prior staff used them.......was that just a shot at the current staff? Otherwise it makes no sense,

 

 

 

Losing Cross and Jano will hurt. It would have hart more if they weren't under utilized last year.

[MichiganDad3]

 

Cross and Jano were given huge roles last year particularly compared to how the prior staff used them.......was that just a shot at the current staff? Otherwise it makes no sense,

 

 

 

Losing Cross and Jano will hurt. It would have hart more if they weren't under utilized last year.

 

They were under utilized last year, but I agree that Jano was even more under utilized under Bo. It is tough to say Cross was under utilized under Bo because of AA.

[Lil' Red]

Losing Cross and Jano will hurt. It would have hart more if they weren't under utilized last year.

Losing Jano will definitely hurt but I don't think losing Cross will be a big deal if Ozigbo and Newby stay healthy.

[MichiganDad3]

 

Losing Cross and Jano will hurt. It would have hart more if they weren't under utilized last year.

Losing Jano will definitely hurt but I don't think losing Cross will be a big deal if Ozigbo and Newby stay healthy.

 

I am excited by the potential of Ozigbo. I am not that impressed with Newby. I hope the OL is improved, and I wonder how much the backs will be hurt by not having Jano to plow the road.

[Minnesota_husker]

 

In Purdue's case, 16 people returning is probably not a good thing.

Except.......ya know, they beat us and all that jazz.

 

That doesnt make them good... We werent good either.

 

Beating Nebraska last year wasnt a quality win.

[Moiraine]

 

 

In Purdue's case, 16 people returning is probably not a good thing.

Except.......ya know, they beat us and all that jazz.

 

That doesnt make them good... We werent good either.

 

Beating Nebraska last year wasnt a quality win.

 

Yes it was. Thanks to the residual effect of usually being decent. Now if we have 1 or 2 more seasons like that, then it wears off and we're just another win. I guarantee Iowa was happy to beat us, and so was every other team that beat us.

[BigRedBuster]

For Purdue, we could have only had 2-3 wins and beating us would be a quality win.

 

OSU??? No. Purdue??? yes.

[Minnesota_husker]

For Purdue, we could have only had 2-3 wins and beating us would be a quality win.

 

OSU??? No. Purdue??? yes.

Quality win doesnt change based on the team.

 

Just cause a 2 win team beats a 3 win team doesnt make that a quality win.

 

 

I dont think anyone should have considered beating Nebraska a quality win.