teachercd Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 The problem is they are using the wrong word. Also, they should be "defunding" fire departments. Drive by one...you will see 4-5 70,000 trucks parked outside while those guys are inside lifting weights and watching TV. Then they have the nerve to ask "us" to shovel snow away from fire hydrants. 1 Link to comment
Moiraine Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 15 minutes ago, RedDenver said: The defund the police movement is about taking money from police budgets and putting it into other services that we need like education, Social Security, Medicare, etc. The Dems are doing the opposite. Ok, I'm just not seeing that from the document they wrote. Is it hidden in the Sustainable Budget Act? Link to comment
RedDenver Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 45 minutes ago, Moiraine said: Ok, I'm just not seeing that from the document they wrote. Is it hidden in the Sustainable Budget Act? The doc they wrote is about budget cuts, which is cutting other services. Additional funding for the police is coming from Biden (and maybe Pelosi?). 1 Link to comment
Moiraine Posted June 11, 2020 Share Posted June 11, 2020 1 minute ago, RedDenver said: The doc they wrote is about budget cuts, which is cutting other services. Additional funding for the police is coming from Biden (and maybe Pelosi?). What an idiot. At the very least REPLACE other s#!t with this. Link to comment
Ratt Mhule Posted June 12, 2020 Share Posted June 12, 2020 Pathetic. This is the loser that got caught on a hot mic saying at a black lives matter protest if he didnt have a primary he wouldnt care. Bye bye Engel! 1 Link to comment
Moiraine Posted June 15, 2020 Share Posted June 15, 2020 1 hour ago, RedDenver said: Ok, ignoring the DNC often being idiots and it's probably just them doing that again... Why does it matter if they lose the current chairman when they can just vote in a different one (right?)? Is he that good at the job? Are they just nervous a progressive will be voted chairman? 1 Link to comment
RedDenver Posted June 16, 2020 Share Posted June 16, 2020 15 hours ago, Moiraine said: Ok, ignoring the DNC often being idiots and it's probably just them doing that again... Why does it matter if they lose the current chairman when they can just vote in a different one (right?)? Is he that good at the job? Are they just nervous a progressive will be voted chairman? Link to comment
Moiraine Posted June 16, 2020 Share Posted June 16, 2020 7 minutes ago, RedDenver said: I can’t read the NYT article. Like I said I am assuming this is an idiot move but I’m still wondering why they would care about losing him as chairman. Maybe I read that wrong though. I think maybe in the tweet they are just using it as a title. Not suggesting they are concerned about his position on the committee. Link to comment
RedDenver Posted June 16, 2020 Share Posted June 16, 2020 2 minutes ago, Moiraine said: I can’t read the NYT article. Like I said I am assuming this is an idiot move but I’m still wondering why they would care about losing him as chairman. Maybe I read that wrong though. I think maybe in the tweet they are just using it as a title. Not suggesting they are concerned about his position on the committee. I took it as they don't care about his committee position, just that he not lose to a progressive. Link to comment
knapplc Posted June 16, 2020 Share Posted June 16, 2020 Anecdotally, I have heard from a friend that Janicek is not, shall we say, "all there." Link to comment
knapplc Posted June 17, 2020 Share Posted June 17, 2020 I just can't fathom why that guy would consider sending a text like that after the #MeToo movement. Don't drink & text, kids. Just don't do it! 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts