teachercd Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 My next question would be then, why use the technique they are using. It looks like once the arms are at full extension you have reached the as far as you can go. Which in this case was parallel. Also, apologize for being the uniformed lifter on the board! Puts less stress on shoulders and elbows which are common football injuries. Also helps with your posture so you can be more upright. Some lifters really struggle with keeping good posture and having your hands on the handles in front of you allow you to keep your head and chest up. It is a safer lift for athletes to still get the benefits of traditional rear squat. So does he need to have a lower hold on the squat rack? Otherwise isn't he doing as much as he can? He could grab lower on the rack with his hands. They have handles to put in the rack that you can grab onto them and not hold the rack, but he is just grabbing the rack. Maliek Collins had a video of him doing 785 pounds as a reference, but Maliek went a little deeper in the squat. And In the end...he is lifting for football...not a power lifting competition. Quote Link to comment
swmohusker Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 My next question would be then, why use the technique they are using. It looks like once the arms are at full extension you have reached the as far as you can go. Which in this case was parallel. Also, apologize for being the uniformed lifter on the board! Puts less stress on shoulders and elbows which are common football injuries. Also helps with your posture so you can be more upright. Some lifters really struggle with keeping good posture and having your hands on the handles in front of you allow you to keep your head and chest up. It is a safer lift for athletes to still get the benefits of traditional rear squat.So does he need to have a lower hold on the squat rack? Otherwise isn't he doing as much as he can?He could grab lower on the rack with his hands. They have handles to put in the rack that you can grab onto them and not hold the rack, but he is just grabbing the rack. Maliek Collins had a video of him doing 785 pounds as a reference, but Maliek went a little deeper in the squat. And In the end...he is lifting for football...not a power lifting competition. Proper technique applies to anybody who is lifting, not just power lifting. Quote Link to comment
zeWilbur Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 My next question would be then, why use the technique they are using. It looks like once the arms are at full extension you have reached the as far as you can go. Which in this case was parallel. Also, apologize for being the uniformed lifter on the board! Puts less stress on shoulders and elbows which are common football injuries. Also helps with your posture so you can be more upright. Some lifters really struggle with keeping good posture and having your hands on the handles in front of you allow you to keep your head and chest up. It is a safer lift for athletes to still get the benefits of traditional rear squat.So does he need to have a lower hold on the squat rack? Otherwise isn't he doing as much as he can?He could grab lower on the rack with his hands. They have handles to put in the rack that you can grab onto them and not hold the rack, but he is just grabbing the rack. Maliek Collins had a video of him doing 785 pounds as a reference, but Maliek went a little deeper in the squat. And In the end...he is lifting for football...not a power lifting competition. Proper technique applies to anybody who is lifting, not just power lifting. Sure, if you are thinking about avoiding injury. I think teach was referencing that the "proper" technique can vary by the desired result. e.g. Dropping full-squat to catch a clean is "proper" but not nearly as useful to a football player as generating enough force to catch it near vertical. Quote Link to comment
swmohusker Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 My next question would be then, why use the technique they are using. It looks like once the arms are at full extension you have reached the as far as you can go. Which in this case was parallel. Also, apologize for being the uniformed lifter on the board! Puts less stress on shoulders and elbows which are common football injuries. Also helps with your posture so you can be more upright. Some lifters really struggle with keeping good posture and having your hands on the handles in front of you allow you to keep your head and chest up. It is a safer lift for athletes to still get the benefits of traditional rear squat.So does he need to have a lower hold on the squat rack? Otherwise isn't he doing as much as he can?He could grab lower on the rack with his hands. They have handles to put in the rack that you can grab onto them and not hold the rack, but he is just grabbing the rack. Maliek Collins had a video of him doing 785 pounds as a reference, but Maliek went a little deeper in the squat. And In the end...he is lifting for football...not a power lifting competition. Proper technique applies to anybody who is lifting, not just power lifting. Sure, if you are thinking about avoiding injury. I think teach was referencing that the "proper" technique can vary by the desired result. e.g. Dropping full-squat to catch a clean is "proper" but not nearly as useful to a football player as generating enough force to catch it near vertical. Truth. I can see that perspective. There is a some variations to the Olympic lifts that can be more sport specific, or help prevent injury/wear and tear. Quote Link to comment
MinnwiscowaSker Posted June 16, 2017 Share Posted June 16, 2017 How did this lifting tangent start up again? 1 Quote Link to comment
swmohusker Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 How did this lifting tangent start up again? Read the thread Quote Link to comment
MinnwiscowaSker Posted June 17, 2017 Share Posted June 17, 2017 How did this lifting tangent start up again?Read the threadYeah yeah, I see the connection made. It's just that the thread was derailed about lifting and seemed to be going back down the rabbit hole. Quote Link to comment
Warrior10 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 Wilt CB to UCLAWilt giveith and Wilt takeith away. Be interesting to hear the reasoning and where we go from here. Please add UCLA. Quote Link to comment
spurs1990 Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 Wilt CB to UCLAWilt giveith and Wilt takeith away. Be interesting to hear the reasoning and where we go from here. Please add UCLA. Hopefully Statford Quote Link to comment
Decked Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 Wilt CB to UCLAWilt giveith and Wilt takeith away. Be interesting to hear the reasoning and where we go from here. Please add UCLA. Hopefully Statford Like I said last a few posts ago before the CB...visit opened his eyes a bit. Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 Soooo....his father is sick so he wants to star closer to home.......but........he's becoming more interested in UCLA. Makes sense. Quote Link to comment
Decked Posted June 19, 2017 Share Posted June 19, 2017 Soooo....his father is sick so he wants to star closer to home.......but........he's becoming more interested in UCLA. Makes sense. Meant the after UCLA visit post. Kid wants to now take his time and weigh all options. That visit really blew his mind. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted June 19, 2017 Author Share Posted June 19, 2017 Please add UCLA. Done Quote Link to comment
RealTomOsborne Posted June 20, 2017 Share Posted June 20, 2017 Love the kids potential. Kid would be another stud, just like some of the other high mollies we've recruited in the past. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.