RedDenver Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 Plus the Carrier plant that Trump "saved" their jobs... nope: Carrier plant layoffs: Worker thought Trump would save her job. She was wrong. Link to comment
commando Posted January 30, 2018 Share Posted January 30, 2018 19 hours ago, BigRedBuster said: Ahhh.....I forgot....we aren't supposed to worry about this anymore. if we jsut stop taking care of the homeless vets and broke grannies we will be ok. oh....and poor children. their broke ass lazy parents should take care of them...not the u.s. taxpayer. we will be ok when we stop taking care of the broken people in our country. they don't deserve the help if they can't help themselves...jesus says so somewhere in the bible i am sure. 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted February 5, 2018 Share Posted February 5, 2018 (edited) #fiscalconservative Edited February 5, 2018 by BigRedBuster 1 Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted February 5, 2018 Share Posted February 5, 2018 37 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: #fiscalconservative Amazing how the Tea Party doesn't care about deficits anymore... 1 Link to comment
deedsker Posted February 5, 2018 Share Posted February 5, 2018 42 minutes ago, dudeguyy said: Amazing how the Tea Party doesn't care about deficits anymore... Don't worry, they are coming for "entitlements" very soon. Link to comment
TGHusker Posted February 8, 2018 Author Share Posted February 8, 2018 This is why I like McMullin vs the current crop of republicans. What he says below in this copied tweet makes perfect sense. This is what conservationism should be about - cost efficient govt and not enlarged deficits. Quote Evan McMullinVerified account @Evan_McMullin 4h4 hours ago We should capitalize on periods of low unemployment and economic expansion by reducing our deficits, not increasing them as Congress and the president are planning. Trillion dollar shortfalls are hamstringing critical government function and will eventually lead to disaster. Link to comment
NM11046 Posted February 8, 2018 Share Posted February 8, 2018 Is it weird that when I saw this header today my brain read it as “Trump Domestic Abuse Policy”? Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 I believe this could be a signal of a trade war with us. Link to comment
RedDenver Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 11 hours ago, BigRedBuster said: Interesting. That's a great step in the right direction for helping the most vulnerable children. Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 This is rather non sequitur. Link to comment
commando Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 40 minutes ago, dudeguyy said: This is rather non sequitur. what? not hillary? or barrack? nor thor the flatulent god of thunder? Link to comment
TGHusker Posted February 12, 2018 Author Share Posted February 12, 2018 39 minutes ago, dudeguyy said: This is rather non sequitur. Seems to me the 'not so intelligently' phrase isn't very....well intelligent. But yes the above is a non sequitur. Plus it is another excuse and casting blame by our child in chief. Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted February 12, 2018 Share Posted February 12, 2018 (edited) 3 hours ago, dudeguyy said: This is rather non sequitur. So....let me get this straight. He is blaming the spending on the military that Bush had to do because of military action after 9/11....meanwhile.....he is exploding the military budget himself. Edited February 12, 2018 by BigRedBuster 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts