Jump to content


How Will The 85 Scholarship Limit Work Now?


Recommended Posts

15 hours ago, Mavric said:

 

 

On 8/18/2020 at 11:40 PM, Mavric said:

 

Pretty sure we would be against this year not counting for anyone.

 

Exactly - ACC, SEC and Big XII players will essentially get a free year/redshirt year of play that won't count against eligibility.

 

We will see how much pull Warren and the BIG reps now have with the NCAA. If it passes the vote on Friday, things won't look good for future BIG power moves - including upcoming TV negotiations. 

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment

2 hours ago, bugeater17 said:

 

 

Exactly - ACC, SEC and Big XII players will essentially get a free year/redshirt year of play that won't count against eligibility.

 

We will see how much pull Warren and the BIG reps now have with the NCAA. If it passes the vote on Friday, things won't look good for future BIG power moves - including upcoming TV negotiations. 

I think Warren is on very shaky ground here and operating from position of weakness unless all the conferences have kids that get sick and they choose to cancel. 
 

He has been far less than impressive. 

  • Plus1 2
Link to comment

Playing one but less than 8 games seems to be the formula for getting an extra year IF the recommended rule change is adopted.  I guess with no change in rules, every player who has not redshirted is losing a year, play or not, and effectively burns the redshirt to do that, unless there is some medical hardship case to be applied - roster wide?   And NCAA not likely to grant about 13,000 of those, on a case by case basis!  lol

 

Link to comment

So the only real effect on 2021 rosters is whether schools will renew the financial packages for sixth-year seniors.  Wisconsin didn't renew their baseball players for another year.

 

But it will be interesting for 2022.  Schools will have to clear enough space for the recruiting class of 2022 one way or the other - have guys leave or don't renew.  Will be pretty interesting.

  • Plus1 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

  • 3 months later...

@Mavric, hopefully all those upperclassmen give it a long consideration because some of them will be heavily challenged for their starting spots if the bulk decide to return. I would hate to bring back an average senior for a 5/6th year and stunt the development of younger guys in the program. I can think of several players where it will benefit us to see them graduate and give more time to the younger core.

 

 

Link to comment

I could see Jaimes getting drafted in the later rounds.  Everyone else would be a FA.  Domann is the only one I would want to come back.  One more year in the same position and if he has a good year I see him getting drafted as well.  I would like to see the younger talent play behind the Bootle and Williams.  Stoll is pretty solid and wouldn't mind him coming back.  He's not super flashy but he is dependable.  

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...