DevoHusker Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 7 hours ago, BigRedBuster said: Sadly, she will probably have a lot of support. Already polling as the leading favorite. I would think that her opponent can just put her press conferences on a loop, with actual fact based data superimposed over her as she is speaking...that would be how I would play it 2 Link to comment
TGHusker Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 12 hours ago, DevoHusker said: With Sarah you get "Daddy Huckabee" - you know he will be a big part of her campaign. So she was a press sec for a failed president and that qualifies her - how?? Her draw will be with her dad's 'street cred' and the fact that Gov Huck was a popular governor and has been a constant on conservative talk TV, Radio, etc Link to comment
knapplc Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 14 minutes ago, TGHusker said: With Sarah you get "Daddy Huckabee" - you know he will be a big part of her campaign. So she was a press sec for a failed president and that qualifies her - how?? Her draw will be with her dad's 'street cred' and the fact that Gov Huck was a popular governor and has been a constant on conservative talk TV, Radio, etc It's a terrible example of how big name recognition is in politics. She's not qualified, but because she's got that trump stank on her, she's a hero to a segment of the population. I hate this just like I hate when spouses of deceased politicians run for their vacant seats, or children of politicians run. 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 1 hour ago, TGHusker said: With Sarah you get "Daddy Huckabee" - you know he will be a big part of her campaign. So she was a press sec for a failed president and that qualifies her - how?? Her draw will be with her dad's 'street cred' and the fact that Gov Huck was a popular governor and has been a constant on conservative talk TV, Radio, etc She was an a$$ to reporters...so that qualifies her in the eyes of the base. She would be a sure fire winner if she would have made up 3rd grade names for them. Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 1 minute ago, DevoHusker said: It is going to be very interesting to see how she handles the media differently. As a Press Secretary, she could spout stuff and be an a$$ and it didn't affect her because her boss loved it. NOW....she is on her own and will need the press to get whatever message she wants out to be reported how she wants it. 1 Link to comment
DevoHusker Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 Just now, BigRedBuster said: It is going to be very interesting to see how she handles the media differently. As a Press Secretary, she could spout stuff and be an a$$ and it didn't affect her because her boss loved it. NOW....she is on her own and will need the press to get whatever message she wants out to be reported how she wants it. Agreed. It will be interesting to see how she responds. 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 10 minutes ago, DevoHusker said: Jim’s gonna do what Jim’s gonna do and always make it about Jim. What a douche 1 Link to comment
knapplc Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 1 minute ago, Archy1221 said: Jim’s gonna do what Jim’s gonna do and always make it about Jim. What a douche Imagine reading what SHS did to Jim Acosta and THIS is your takeaway. 3 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 1 minute ago, Archy1221 said: Jim’s gonna do what Jim’s gonna do and always make it about Jim. What a douche It's always interesting what some people take from a comment. 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 5 minutes ago, knapplc said: Imagine reading what SHS did to Jim Acosta and THIS is your takeaway. Jim shouldn’t have manhandled a female WH intern. 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 1 minute ago, Archy1221 said: Jim shouldn’t have manhandled a female WH intern. It is amazing when someone is as partisan as you are. 1 Link to comment
knapplc Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 2 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: Jim shouldn’t have manhandled a female WH intern. And you shouldn't push lies. A trump-appointed judge agreed with Acosta. 2 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 12 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: It is amazing when someone is as partisan as you are. Jim was a well known WH correspondent and the young lady was a WH intern I believe. He used that power dynamic along with force to keep that mic and keep grandstanding. Well done Jim and well done for excusing that behavior. 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 25, 2021 Share Posted January 25, 2021 1 minute ago, Archy1221 said: Jim was a well known WH correspondent and the young lady was a WH intern I believe. He used that power dynamic along with force to keep that mic and keep grandstanding. Well done Jim and well done for excusing that behavior. Well done Archy. Link to comment
Recommended Posts