Haspula Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Damn, what a wate of his time. I hope he made good money at sid dillion Quote Link to comment
StPaulHusker Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Quote DE Avery Moss was informed today by the University he will not be let back into Nebraska ($) http://t.co/9NutaQ1ZIP pic.twitter.com/lg6PbRQItM— Sean Callahan (@Sean_Callahan) January 9, 2015 Quote Link to comment
QMany Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 I feel bad for the kid. That is unfortunate. "Cited Title IX concerns." Quote Link to comment
QMany Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 It was nice of them to wait until three days before classes begin. He sacrificed a year of his life to stay at Nebraska. I hope he is able to enroll somewhere else ASAP and get his career back on track. Quote Link to comment
NUpolo8 Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 It was nice of them to wait until three days before classes begin. He sacrificed a year of his life to stay at Nebraska. I hope he is able to enroll somewhere else ASAP and get his career back on track. It sounds like he got tremendously bad advice, I'd take it up with them before you start disparaging an institution you're supposedly like. Quote Link to comment
QMany Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 It sounds like he got tremendously bad advice, I'd take it up with them before you start disparaging an institution you're supposedly like. Who is them you speak of? I wasn't privy to these conversations like you. Quote Link to comment
NUpolo8 Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 It sounds like he got tremendously bad advice, I'd take it up with them before you start disparaging an institution you're supposedly like. Who is them you speak of? I wasn't privy to these conversations like you. But you are privy to the inner workings of this grand scheme by some shadowy folk at NU to waste a year of Moss's life, as you put it. Interesting. He's gone. It's probably for the best. All he had to do was not commit sexual assault twice and he stays. I'm chalking this up to an "oh well" 2 Quote Link to comment
QMany Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 All he had to do was not commit sexual assault twice and he stays. He didn't commit sexual assault. 1 Quote Link to comment
NUpolo8 Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 All he had to do was not commit sexual assault twice and he stays. He didn't commit sexual assault. Pleading exposing yourself twice down to indecency then. Semanticsboard lives! I still don't want him back. Quote Link to comment
BigWillie Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Couple things.. Avery was never promised anything by the University in regards to being eligible once again. If Avery was promised anything, it was by certain coaches who thought they could control the situation. Avery was very aware from the beginning that he was only promised the opportunity for an appeal from the University, never a guaranteed reinstatement. 3 Quote Link to comment
QMany Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 All he had to do was not commit sexual assault twice and he stays.He didn't commit sexual assault. Pleading exposing yourself twice down to indecency then. Semanticsboard lives! I still don't want him back. He didn't need to plead it down. None of his actions were first, second, or third degree sexual assault in Nebraska. It is not semantics, it is the law. You are are improperly applying it and accusing a former Husker player of a crime he didn't commit. 1 Quote Link to comment
HuskerShark Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 What kind of world do we live in where a man is not allowed to whip his dong out in public? SMH But in all seriousness, I don't know the whole story, and I'm biased because I think he's an exceptionally talented DE which we need next year, but from an outsiders perspective, I don't like how this looks. It stinks. 2 Quote Link to comment
Junior Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 All he had to do was not commit sexual assault twice and he stays.He didn't commit sexual assault. Pleading exposing yourself twice down to indecency then. Semanticsboard lives! I still don't want him back. He didn't need to plead it down. None of his actions were first, second, or third degree sexual assault in Nebraska. It is not semantics, it is the law. You are are improperly applying it and accusing a former Husker player of a crime he didn't commit. Maybe he's not guilty of sexual assault, as legally defined in Nebraska. However, in some states flashing would be considered sexual assault. Quote Link to comment
sd'sker Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 All he had to do was not commit sexual assault twice and he stays.He didn't commit sexual assault. Pleading exposing yourself twice down to indecency then. Semanticsboard lives! I still don't want him back. He didn't need to plead it down. None of his actions were first, second, or third degree sexual assault in Nebraska. It is not semantics, it is the law. You are are improperly applying it and accusing a former Husker player of a crime he didn't commit. a lot of the law is a matter of semantics. what do you think is being argued in so many appellate cases? Quote Link to comment
SouthLincoln Husker Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Regardless this was handled poorly by the University. They should have told him last year, instead of wasting his time. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.