Nebfanatic Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 5 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: If Fox is so factual, why would they need to not be included. Wouldn't they just get last place in this contest? Or are you afraid they would blow through the competition like 95 Nebraska for that fake news trophy? 4 Link to comment
commando Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 1 hour ago, BigRedBuster said: FAUX NEWS in a landslide Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 (edited) Friendly reminder that Fox News was recently dropped in the UK due to low viewership and has repeatedly broken the impartiality laws there. Edited November 27, 2017 by dudeguyy 3 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted November 27, 2017 Author Share Posted November 27, 2017 (edited) Edited November 27, 2017 by BigRedBuster 2 Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 10 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: Man that video of O'Keefe embedded in the story is something else. For those who don't know, he leads an organization named Project Veritas that routinely records people without their knowledge, tries to entice them into saying things that can be construed as damaging & then edits the tapes to maximize damage. The guy is a grade A slimeball who is out to try to hurt the images of people or organizations by trying to pass off hidden, doctored video as truth. Based on how shifty he was acting, I'd say the Post had him dead to rights on this accuser. Pretty gross they'd go this far to get a pedophile into the Senate, but here we are. This reeks of Bannon. He's collaborated with them in the past, IIRC. 1 Link to comment
NM11046 Posted November 27, 2017 Share Posted November 27, 2017 I heard an amazing interview with reporters from NYT (I think - they broke the Louie CK and Weinstein stories) and they were talking about this very circumstance and how often they get approached with fake stories or with offers to be key note speakers at "events" etc. They are pretty good about understanding the number of poorly motivated individuals out there - I need to read more about this situation, but I find it interesting that they busted the gal actually walking into Veritas. Must have had a pretty good inkling that she was not legit. 2 Link to comment
zoogs Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 These are the Project Veritas guys? Calling them pranksters seems...inadequate. This is a completely serious mission for them. Link to comment
RedDenver Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 1 hour ago, zoogs said: These are the Project Veritas guys? Calling them pranksters seems...inadequate. This is a completely serious mission for them. It is the Project Veritas scumbags. Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted November 28, 2017 Author Share Posted November 28, 2017 Interesting questions. 1 Link to comment
NM11046 Posted November 28, 2017 Share Posted November 28, 2017 8 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: Interesting questions. "Oh! I know, I know - call on me!!!" Yes. (check the timing of some of Moore's comments on "an investigation is happening and you'll see soon enough"). Yes - duh. And probably yes. Link to comment
zoogs Posted November 29, 2017 Share Posted November 29, 2017 It may be a mistake to think our institutions are standing strong. They are compromised, and it will only get worse if allowed to continue. 1 Link to comment
commando Posted December 6, 2017 Share Posted December 6, 2017 i thought trump didn't want to do the photoshoot? 5 Link to comment
Recommended Posts