BigRedBuster Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 16 hours ago, Moiraine said: Just read the part of Taylor’s testimony about Greenland. Trump has the mind of a 4 year old. Can you point me to where this is? Thanks in advance. Edit: Thanks, I found it broken out in the commentary. Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 9 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: 'Why did Sondland change his testimony?' I don't know maybe he didn't want to go to jail for perjury? 4 Link to comment
QMany Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 On 11/5/2019 at 2:06 PM, QMany said: I can't wait for the Republican character assassination to start on Sondland... the guy that gave Trump ONE MILLION DOLLARS! 24 hours is longer than I expected, not only are their legal defenses lazy. 57 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: 1 Link to comment
knapplc Posted November 7, 2019 Author Share Posted November 7, 2019 Ruh Rohhh, Raggy! 1 Link to comment
TGHusker Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 Bolton wants legal clarification before he testifies but is willing to do so. https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/bolton-willing-to-defy-white-house-and-testify-if-court-clears-the-way-according-to-people-familiar-with-his-views/ar-BBWq6CC 1 Link to comment
QMany Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 27 minutes ago, knapplc said: Ruh Rohhh, Raggy! They need to keep in concise (engaging), but I hope they include all applicable charges within each Article. Abuse of Power (Extortion, Bribery, Emoluments, etc.) Obstruction of Justice (Mueller Report, defying Congressional subponeas, witness tampering, etc.) Contempt (defying Congressional subpoenas) I think it would be a mistake not to at least include them (giving them a pass, you only get one shot), while maybe focusing on the easiest and most recent (Ukraine extortion). Link to comment
Ulty Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 36 minutes ago, QMany said: They need to keep in concise (engaging), but I hope they include all applicable charges within each Article. Abuse of Power (Extortion, Bribery, Emoluments, etc.) Obstruction of Justice (Mueller Report, defying Congressional subponeas, witness tampering, etc.) Contempt (defying Congressional subpoenas) I think it would be a mistake not to at least include them (giving them a pass, you only get one shot), while maybe focusing on the easiest and most recent (Ukraine extortion). What if they also threw in sexual misconduct charges on top of it all? They could just play video of his own words, and line up the 25 women who have accused him. 2 Link to comment
NM11046 Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 Swalwell the last couple days Has been dumbing it down nicely. Trump is guilty of “Defense dollars for Dirt” That Trump was using tax payer dollars to deny assistance to a country. People died and this was to get dirt on a political rival. We americans paid For that. Link to comment
Mike Mcdee Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 31 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: Why do I feel like his tweet is ingenuous and is only meant to rile up a certain portion of the population? The people who don't understand how the impeachment process works. Or how any trial works for that mater. Some one should show Don that video of those lawyers who rap about not saying anything. It's super cheesy but applicable. Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted November 7, 2019 Share Posted November 7, 2019 1 minute ago, Mike Mcdee said: Why do I feel like his tweet is ingenuous and is only meant to rile up a certain portion of the population? The people who don't understand how the impeachment process works. Or how any trial works for that mater. Some one should show Don that video of those lawyers who rap about not saying anything. It's super cheesy but applicable. It’s meant solely for his base that he’s already convinced that he’s being railroaded by people who hate America. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts