BigRedBuster Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Wow....I guess people don't care about the President abiding by the constitution and the rule of law. 2 Link to comment
Huskerzoo Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, BigRedBuster said: Wow....I guess people don't care about the President abiding by the constitution and the rule of law. The world is listening to 2 different debates. Both sides are winning their own debate. As it relates to Ukraine interactions, it's hard to argue that what has been put forth hasn't occurred. The right side of the aisle is only discussing Hunter Biden and how what he did was wrong. Given this is a football forum, I'll put it this way. The Democrats are arguing that we're having a losing season (a fact) and that's really bad (an opinion) and that things have to change (a consequence). The Republicans are arguing that Eric Crouch was a better quarterback than Tommy Armstrong (a thing that may or may not be true, but is unrelated to the conversation we're trying to have). 4 Link to comment
Ulty Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Huskerzoo said: The world is listening to 2 different debates. Both sides are winning their own debate. As it relates to Ukraine interactions, it's hard to argue that what has been put forth hasn't occurred. The right side of the aisle is only discussing Hunter Biden and how what he did was wrong. Given this is a football forum, I'll put it this way. The Democrats are arguing that we're having a losing season (a fact) and that's really bad (an opinion) and that things have to change (a consequence). The Republicans are arguing that Eric Crouch was a better quarterback than Tommy Armstrong (a thing that may or may not be true, but is unrelated to the conversation we're trying to have). The way this group of Republicans interprets evidence...they would probably argue that Tanner Lee was a better QB than Eric Crouch, and also question Tom Osborne's patriotism. 4 Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 FBI wants to question the whistleblower about the call over potential campaign finance violations that the DOJ quickly dismissed Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 And I posted earlier in the thread something Dems are glossing over and republicans are championing though I'm not so sure they should be, but Ukraine held a press conference today announcing an investigation into Burisma. The defense Ukraine didn't open an investigation is now dead. 1 Link to comment
Huskerzoo Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 1 minute ago, Nebfanatic said: And I posted earlier in the thread something Dems are glossing over and republicans are championing though I'm not so sure they should be, but Ukraine held a press conference today announcing an investigation into Burisma. The defense Ukraine didn't open an investigation is now dead. That's some A+ level trolling. Link to comment
knapplc Posted November 20, 2019 Author Share Posted November 20, 2019 57 minutes ago, Nebfanatic said: Maloney from the top rope!! I'm just seeing this. Good night Irene! 3 Link to comment
TGHusker Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Schiff has strong closing remarks. In the end, this was a bad day for trump. 1 Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 19 minutes ago, Huskerzoo said: That's some A+ level trolling. ? https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-trump-impeachment-burisma/ukraine-widens-probe-against-burisma-founder-to-embezzlement-of-state-funds-idUSL8N280601 Link to comment
Huskerzoo Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 10 minutes ago, Nebfanatic said: ? https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-trump-impeachment-burisma/ukraine-widens-probe-against-burisma-founder-to-embezzlement-of-state-funds-idUSL8N280601 I was referring to by Ukraine. Announcing that during the Sondland hearing where we keep hearing that the investigation didn't happen. 1 Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 6 minutes ago, Huskerzoo said: I was referring to by Ukraine. Announcing that during the Sondland hearing where we keep hearing that the investigation didn't happen. Ahhhhh makes sense my bad. They still want that WH meeting Link to comment
NM11046 Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 46 minutes ago, Nebfanatic said: FBI wants to question the whistleblower about the call over potential campaign finance violations that the DOJ quickly dismissed Last I heard they weren't saying why they wanted to talk to them, and speculation was it was Barr's attempt to use the DOJ to unmasked the whistleblower. Where did you seen that it was looking into the DOJ? THAT"s super interesting. 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 8 minutes ago, Huskerzoo said: I was referring to by Ukraine. Announcing that during the Sondland hearing where we keep hearing that the investigation didn't happen. The Republican argument is simple. The aid was released months ago. Only now are they investigating. It's obvious that they aren't linked. Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 6 minutes ago, NM11046 said: Last I heard they weren't saying why they wanted to talk to them, and speculation was it was Barr's attempt to use the DOJ to unmasked the whistleblower. Where did you seen that it was looking into the DOJ? THAT"s super interesting. That might have just been speculation a nbc youtube live stream analyst mentioned it Link to comment
Recommended Posts