knapplc Posted April 26, 2017 Author Share Posted April 26, 2017 I wonder if this will kill the 94-95 Huskers 30-for-30.It's already in production, and I think ESPN has good ratings on their 30 for 30s. I think you're right. I think it's mostly done, and it should get pretty good ratings, so you'd think they'd finish it up and air it. Quote Link to comment
ColoradoHusk Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Basically what ESPN is doing now is letting go of a number of on-air personalities that have pretty large contracts. Who knows if those who were let go were offered a lower salary, but they can be replaced with reporters and sports anchors who would demand a lot less money. Quote Link to comment
Scratchtown Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 I don't watch ESPN unless there is a game on. I don't watch Fox Sports unless its Cowherd's show. Once our contract is up with DISH were going to rid ourselves of it and use Hulu and our Xbox as the main tv. Just need to cut back on stuff. TV was the first at the list, both for time and financial decisions Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted April 26, 2017 Author Share Posted April 26, 2017 I don't watch ESPN unless there is a game on. I don't watch Fox Sports unless its Cowherd's show. Once our contract is up with DISH were going to rid ourselves of it and use Hulu and our Xbox as the main tv. Just need to cut back on stuff. TV was the first at the list, both for time and financial decisions We did the same. Cable/Satellite is outrageous and the first thing to cut. We've gotten along just fine with Netflix, Amazon & a digital antenna for going on two years. 1 Quote Link to comment
Red Five Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 They have hired many team/conference bloggers over the last 5ish years for both NFL/CFB who are being let go as well. Those guys are great during the season, but in the off-season they offer little value. I mean how many articles do you need about each teams x-factor or best/worst case for the coming season. Also looks like the gutted the online presence for the NHL. Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 What does 'interactions' measure? Quote Link to comment
Scratchtown Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 I don't watch ESPN unless there is a game on. I don't watch Fox Sports unless its Cowherd's show. Once our contract is up with DISH were going to rid ourselves of it and use Hulu and our Xbox as the main tv. Just need to cut back on stuff. TV was the first at the list, both for time and financial decisions We did the same. Cable/Satellite is outrageous and the first thing to cut. We've gotten along just fine with Netflix, Amazon & a digital antenna for going on two years. I remember you talking about the antenna at one point and I remember thinking how much it would suck. Now I'm to the point of realization that paying TV in general is kind of the sh!ts. Just not worth it. My time is worth more than sitting in front of the tv so I can't justify paying 120 a month when I don't even use it. Told my wife to get prepared for antenna Quote Link to comment
knapplc Posted April 26, 2017 Author Share Posted April 26, 2017 Digital antennas are actually pretty slick. The picture is better than cable. You'll be surprised. It almost hurt my eyes when I watched the Super Bowl the first time. Quote Link to comment
ColoradoHusk Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 They have hired many team/conference bloggers over the last 5ish years for both NFL/CFB who are being let go as well. Those guys are great during the season, but in the off-season they offer little value. I mean how many articles do you need about each teams x-factor or best/worst case for the coming season. Also looks like the gutted the online presence for the NHL. I questioned why ESPN would hire a guy like Mitch Sherman (who was at the OWH). Nothing against Mitch, as he is a very good reporter. But, when he was originally hired by ESPN, he was to cover recruiting, but he eventually turned into an ESPN beat writer for Nebraska. I know Mitch has moved on to cover the entire Big 12 now, but I didn't understand why ESPN would want all these local guys on their payroll. I guess it was an attempt to grow, but people still preferred their local writers and media coverage. Quote Link to comment
ScottyIce Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Wow. Really bummed for a few of these guys on the list. Quite a few baseball writers that I followed close. Also, football personalities as well. Will miss Dilfer & Kanell. I bet they land on their feet quite well though. Quote Link to comment
Cdog923 Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Still waiting for the shoe to drop on Desmond Howard. 2 Quote Link to comment
ColoradoHusk Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 The main cause for ESPN's financial troubles. http://www.sportsbusinessdaily.com/Journal/Issues/2015/10/26/Media/ESPN.aspx 1 Quote Link to comment
Fru Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Still waiting for the shoe to drop on Desmond Howard. Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 Sucks people are losing their jobs, on the other hand f#*k ESPN. 1 Quote Link to comment
Pedro Guerrero Posted April 26, 2017 Share Posted April 26, 2017 I can't tell you the last time I watched ESPN for anything besides a game (mostly Dodgers and the Big Red) or 30 for 30. Anything else (other games included especially NCAA BB and any hockey) is pretty much full on garbage television. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.