HuskerDeadHead420 Posted October 3, 2011 Share Posted October 3, 2011 It's embarrassing! Where is the fire? This is Nebraska football! They night to right this ship and quick! Young team tho so I can't completely go off at this point. Bring on Ohio State! One game at a time! Quote Link to comment
BIG ERN Posted October 3, 2011 Share Posted October 3, 2011 Carter, T. Moore, Crick, Meredith David, Compton, Whaley Dennard, Washington, Stafford, Osborne Quote Link to comment
Treand3 Posted October 3, 2011 Share Posted October 3, 2011 I'm a bit intrigued by putting Stafford at LB cause I think he would bring serious athleticism to that spot! Now do I think Bo will do that?....heck no. Does anyone know what Whaley brings to the table at LB? I honestly don't know much about him. Quote Link to comment
bshirt Posted October 3, 2011 Share Posted October 3, 2011 I defer to Bo but I would LOVE to scrap the 2-gap stuff and go back to an attacking defense. We're getting lit up like a Christmas tree anyway and it's fun to watch! Quote Link to comment
Ziebol Posted October 3, 2011 Share Posted October 3, 2011 What are Staffords measurment's compared to Lavonte? They look kinda close in size to me. Quote Link to comment
krc1995 Posted October 3, 2011 Share Posted October 3, 2011 I'm almost tempted to suggest we bring the two-way player out of retirement and let Enunwa play some defense. Could you imagine that kid roving the middle of the field, over the top? Who knows if he could handle it, but if he could get it down (probably better than Cassidy anyway)... That would be pretty nuts. That kid would punish some offensive players. THAT is exactly the kind of physicality and swagger the Blackshirts are missing right now. Rex tackled pretty well Saturday night.... lol Quote Link to comment
JJ Husker Posted October 3, 2011 Share Posted October 3, 2011 I never advocate changing philosophy in the middle of the season. But I think the 2 gap needs to go. Our guys aren't good enough to run it and it gives too much time for the QB to make a play, because we have no pressure from the front 4. Our secondary isn't good enough in coverage as it is, but when the QB and WR have time to make a play, then that puts more pressure on the secondary. We need to dial up the blitzes and get creative with it. Line up David on the end during some plays and let him rush. Also set our front 4 loose and let em rush the gaps. Crick is at his best when that is what he is concentrating on. We need new guys at LB in place of Fisher. Compton is OK. The LB's are out there thinking and not doing. Honestly, if it is true that guys aren't applying the coaching in the games then find someone who will. That is your job as a leader/coach. You find someone who can get the job done. I feel like the defense is doing what the offense has been doing for awhile now...trying to pound a square peg into a round hole. Plus it seems like they are just going with who has the most experience and knowledge of the defense...which is something I remember us all talking about with the offense with Watson. There are playmakers on this defense so find them and get them out there. That is why coaches get paid the big bucks. I seriously question the whole competition at every position talk we keep hearing about and I have for a couple of years now, but never said anything. I would tend to agree. The 2 gap looks brilliant when you have a guy like Suh getting double and triple teamed and still making plays. As good as Crick and others on the D-Line may be, they simply aren't THAT good (few are). With the 2 gap system we are not getting any D-Line pressure on the QB. To get pressure we have to blitz and when we face a well coached team with a good QB....well we have seen how that defense works sans a Suh. Quote Link to comment
T_O_Bull Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 I don't think the D is broke. I think the size of the Baddger OL had something to do with the turn out of the game. Wagner, 6-6, 320 1st Konz, 6-5, 315 1st Oglesby, 6-7, 330 1st Zeiter, 6-4, 315 1st Frederick. 6-4, 330 1st Matthias, 6-5, 330 2nd Groy, 6-5, 320 2nd Current, 6-3, 305 2nd Dehn, 6-6, 335 2nd Burge, 6-7, 325 2nd Haverstein, 6-8, 345 3rd Lewallen, 6-6, 320 3rd Kondanko, 6-9, 330 Marz, 6-7, 280 Ball, 6-7, 335 Coon, 6-7, 315 Team ave, 6-6, 322 Starters 6-5.5, 322 T_O_B G>B>R Quote Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted October 4, 2011 Author Share Posted October 4, 2011 I don't think the D is broke. I think the size of the Baddger OL had something to do with the turn out of the game. Wagner, 6-6, 320 1st Konz, 6-5, 315 1st Oglesby, 6-7, 330 1st Zeiter, 6-4, 315 1st Frederick. 6-4, 330 1st Matthias, 6-5, 330 2nd Groy, 6-5, 320 2nd Current, 6-3, 305 2nd Dehn, 6-6, 335 2nd Burge, 6-7, 325 2nd Haverstein, 6-8, 345 3rd Lewallen, 6-6, 320 3rd Kondanko, 6-9, 330 Marz, 6-7, 280 Ball, 6-7, 335 Coon, 6-7, 315 Team ave, 6-6, 322 Starters 6-5.5, 322 T_O_B G>B>R So do we concede to Wisconsin and just let go of the fact they rolled us because they're O-Line is comprised of huge farm boys? We can't, and we have to figure out a way to stop them should we play them again. Some way, somehow. If TCU can handle NU damn well better be able to. Also, giving up big points to Washington and Fresno State had nothing to do with Wisconsin's line. But I see your point... They big. Quote Link to comment
bbhusker Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 Maybe it's just me, but with Pelini being more calm and showing less fire it seems as though our defense has done the same. Quote Link to comment
Igetbored216 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 First, the players need to keep their head up, wrap up, and drive through the tackle. Tackling is the foundation of any good defense and I see so many misses where the RB is stopped behind the LOS but the defender just bounces off or misses them totally because their head is down. Look at LSU or Alabama this year. You don't see many missed or broken tackles. You can move players wherever the hell you want, but if the the defense can't tackle, it won't matter. Fix that first, then worry about he lineup. 1 Quote Link to comment
Blackshirt39 Posted October 4, 2011 Share Posted October 4, 2011 First, the players need to keep their head up, wrap up, and drive through the tackle. Tackling is the foundation of any good defense and I see so many misses where the RB is stopped behind the LOS but the defender just bounces off or misses them totally because their head is down. Look at LSU or Alabama this year. You don't see many missed or broken tackles. You can move players wherever the hell you want, but if the the defense can't tackle, it won't matter. Fix that first, then worry about he lineup. Bo really stressed the fundamentals in yesterday's presser and I expect this will be a major point of emphasis all week in practice. However, we have guys playing way out of position on D and there needs to movement on that front as well. Quote Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted October 4, 2011 Author Share Posted October 4, 2011 First, the players need to keep their head up, wrap up, and drive through the tackle. Tackling is the foundation of any good defense and I see so many misses where the RB is stopped behind the LOS but the defender just bounces off or misses them totally because their head is down. Look at LSU or Alabama this year. You don't see many missed or broken tackles. You can move players wherever the hell you want, but if the the defense can't tackle, it won't matter. Fix that first, then worry about he lineup. Bo really stressed the fundamentals in yesterday's presser and I expect this will be a major point of emphasis all week in practice. However, we have guys playing way out of position on D and there needs to movement on that front as well. I have a feeling the issue with having guys way out of position is really due to what Bo mentioned, young players still picking up the scheme and learning to trust it and play aggressively at the same time. The unfortunate part about that is... we only have a limited number of guys to plug into spots and see how they react. Some might have better instincts than others and thus react better and get caught out of position less, but perhaps we just don't have the dogs right now to be able to plug in and instantly improve the situation. As rough as it might be, we might just have to stick with our young guys in certain spots right now until they get more experienced and grow into good players who trust themselves and make plays. Quote Link to comment
ZRod Posted October 5, 2011 Share Posted October 5, 2011 I don't think their size had anything to do with our problems. Rewatching the game on BTN we seem to hold the line well and rarely if ever got pushed back. The real problem seems to be the fill from the LBs or their over pursuit and a general lack of tackling by all. I think the front seven would have no problem playing a physical game with anyone, but they need to follow the plays properly keeping their eyes up and WRAP UP. I do think a switch to one gap would help us out, but I'm not sure it's a good idea 5 games in. I think the line can continue with the personel they have, but somethinh has to change with the LBs (obviously not David, Compton has been average). Give the others guys a shot. If I recall they didn't look like they would be a fish out of water if we plugged them in early on. If anything we would simply be back where we started if they don't pan out and atleast know our depth. As for the secondary that's just confusing to me. It's hard to judge from just tv views, but if we are going to play off coverage then we are going to give up the short routs, that's just a given against a good QB. And thats fine to an extent because we have mixed in some press, but if we're going with the bend don't break attitude the safties can not bite like they did and give up the big plays. They must keep everything infront of them. I think the CBs just need experience and the right combinations which is probably why we've seen so many different ones. But unfortunatly I think no matter what the co,bination is it's just going to tale time. As far as safties I think Stafford could be an option at LB and in that case PJ and Osborne would seem to be a good fit for the safties. They both have experience and from what little I've seen of them this year they are always flying to the ball. (and why isn't Osborne playing? I know people said he pissed Bo off but is there really any truth to it, and if so what did he do?) Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.