Jaybird Posted December 17, 2011 Share Posted December 17, 2011 So I hear that Under Armour has inked a deal with Northwestern to be the main athletic apparel provider for the school in all sports. This is the First school to sign with UA in the B1G. This seems to be a pretty big topic these days as to which company provides your school's apparel. Some say Nike, some say Adidas and now there is UA. What say you on this topic? Is one company better than another and why? Are you in favor of switching up uniforms all the time a la Oregon etc or are you for tradition? In my personal opinion schools like Texas, Ohio State, Nebraska, Michigan, Alabama and other traditional powers should leave everything alone and keep the uniforms the same as they have been for years as this is what makes college football great, the traditions and pageantry makes college football quite unique. If you are an up and comer trying to make a splash and get some attention then what ever I don't really care what you do, a la Oregon, Maryland etc. If you want to do a throwback for a game per year or something like that I don't really care all that much but to have 800 different combinations and look different every football Saturday seems crazy to me. I personally don't understand the allure of having all of the different combinations and why a kid would choose a school based on such criteria but to each their own I guess. What do you guys think? Quote Link to comment
B.B. Hemingway Posted December 17, 2011 Share Posted December 17, 2011 Oregon, and Maryland have sweet uniforms, but keep that style out of Lincoln Quote Link to comment
HeyBurke Posted December 17, 2011 Share Posted December 17, 2011 If Nebraska were to drop adidas, I'd prefer a switch to Under Armour. Nike stuff is just cheap and poorly made. 1 Quote Link to comment
nowhereman Posted December 17, 2011 Share Posted December 17, 2011 If Nebraska were to drop adidas, I'd prefer a switch to Under Armour. Nike stuff is just cheap and poorly made. I don't think the new Adidas jerseys are all that great, either. I know the players commented that they like how lightweight and stretchy it is, but I think the material is fragile. I've noticed way more guys with rips and holes around the shoulder pads as the games progress. And the screen-printed sleeve stripes and player names on the back look shabby once the jersey is stretched over the pads. I think Adidas needs to rethink the Techfit line. I don't think Nebraska should do anything dramatic or flashy with their uniforms, but I would like to see some refinement. I'm no fashion expert, but this year's getup just doesn't look that good to me. Quote Link to comment
OmahaPlaya Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 A school usually always has finally say on how the uni looks no matter who the supplier is being it Nike, Adidas, Under Armor or even Russel Athletic. Quote Link to comment
Axl_sued_me Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 Oregon, and Maryland have sweet uniforms, but keep that style out of Lincoln We are in a "materialistic" world now. Kids want to look good and modern. So I say, if it would help recruiting, then cut the traditional uni's. Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 Oregon, and Maryland has sweet uniforms, but keep that style out of Lincoln Fixed that for you. Quote Link to comment
Malth Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 Oregon, and Maryland have sweet uniforms, but keep that style out of Lincoln We are in a "materialistic" world now. Kids want to look good and modern. So I say, if it would help recruiting, then cut the traditional uni's. nononononononononononnonononononononononononono. no. Quote Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 Oregon, and Maryland have sweet uniforms, but keep that style out of Lincoln We are in a "materialistic" world now. Kids want to look good and modern. So I say, if it would help recruiting, then cut the traditional uni's. nononononononononononnonononononononononononono. no. Quote Link to comment
ccm420 Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 nike is much better. there is a reason the nba switched to nike. Quote Link to comment
HeyBurke Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 nike is much better. there is a reason the nba switched to nike. What are you talking about? The NBA's contract with adidas runs for like, another six years. Quote Link to comment
Excel Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 If I ever run a football team we're going to go out there wearing straight Armani. Fresh 2 Death. 6 Quote Link to comment
Marf Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 If Nebraska were to drop adidas, I'd prefer a switch to Under Armour. Nike stuff is just cheap and poorly made. Disagreed entirely. My school is Adidas sponsored, and their stuff is crap. We had a Nike rep in 2 weeks ago showing off their new stuff, and it seemed like a night and day difference in quality. The new Adidas cleats, those adi-star things, are gross. They are paper mache. I don't know how more D1 football players haven't rolled ankles, I get a mountain of tape every day and still feel insecure. The adidas clothes' durability is even bad. My undershirts and shorts from last year are already tearing or fraying, while I have Nike stuff from high school that is still going strong. I'd be all for a Nike switch at Nebraska. Plus, it looks cooler. Some of you old timers need to get with the new styles. Some Nike Pro Combat jerseys designed to look traditional, kind of like the Adidas ones now but in Nike form, would look sweet. It would certainly help recruiting. May sound silly, but it's true. 1 Quote Link to comment
TJ Alum Husker Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 If Nebraska were to drop adidas, I'd prefer a switch to Under Armour. Nike stuff is just cheap and poorly made. Disagreed entirely. My school is Adidas sponsored, and their stuff is crap. We had a Nike rep in 2 weeks ago showing off their new stuff, and it seemed like a night and day difference in quality. The new Adidas cleats, those adi-star things, are gross. They are paper mache. I don't know how more D1 football players haven't rolled ankles, I get a mountain of tape every day and still feel insecure. The adidas clothes' durability is even bad. My undershirts and shorts from last year are already tearing or fraying, while I have Nike stuff from high school that is still going strong. I'd be all for a Nike switch at Nebraska. Plus, it looks cooler. Some of you old timers need to get with the new styles. Some Nike Pro Combat jerseys designed to look traditional, kind of like the Adidas ones now but in Nike form, would look sweet. It would certainly help recruiting. May sound silly, but it's true. Uh...both Adidas AND Nike are the old timers. Under Armour is the new up and comer. Quote Link to comment
Landomatic Posted December 18, 2011 Share Posted December 18, 2011 Everyone has an opinion about this but I think the fact that Nike has almost every professional super star and almost every top college program is all the proof needed to determine which is the best and which ones the kids these days want to be associated with. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.