zoogs Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 So it appears the story here is not changing schemes, but teaching some new technique to our linemen - is that fair to say? Less dramatic, but perhaps no less productive. Quote Link to comment
bshirt Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 ERIC MARTIN HAS BEEN UNLEASHED WooHOO!! Sounds good to me! Quote Link to comment
MLB 51 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 This should create problems for Robinson. Force him to throw under pressure and he will make bad choices. Quote Link to comment
Treand3 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 This should create problems for Robinson. Force him to throw under pressure and he will make bad choices. If you haven't already, look at his body language in the game against Iowa and MSU. He was nowhere near as comfortable and in rhythm in those match-ups opposed to arguably one of his best games of the season against us. Quote Link to comment
lo country Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 This should create problems for Robinson. Force him to throw under pressure and he will make bad choices. If you haven't already, look at his body language in the game against Iowa and MSU. He was nowhere near as comfortable and in rhythm in those match-ups opposed to arguably one of his best games of the season against us. MSU beat Robinson like a drum and it showed. I think that is a great strategy to follow. I am hoping that do to last years inexperience on the DL and secondary, Bo and Co held off blitzing for fear DR would kill us if he broke contain. This year, with an experienced D seeing the field, more aggressive line play and a more physical secondary I hope to see us hit him every snap and get him thinking and gun shy to keep the ball. Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 So it appears the story here is not changing schemes, but teaching some new technique to our linemen - is that fair to say? Less dramatic, but perhaps no less productive. Seems accurate to me, based on the Kaz interviews I've watched. Quote Link to comment
HuskerShark Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 From everything that I have heard thus far in camp, I am really looking for bigger and better things out of our D-Line this year. Baker Steinkuhler and Jason Ankrah are the 2 guys on the line that I expect to dominate big time. Then if Meredith can pull through and play the way we know he can, we are looking pretty dang solid. It will just depend on the other DT. Hopefully someone steps up, whether it is Rome, Randle, or even Valentine. Regardless, there looks to be some decent depth on both lines this year as long as we can stay healthy. Quote Link to comment
BIGREDIOWAN Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 I still say Rome is going to be a great player for us. He has that attitude about him that's been missing from the defense for a long time, minus Suh. He showed that in the Minnesota game and against a paper towel dispenser at the airport in Wisconsin. Quote Link to comment
Enhance Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 I still say Rome is going to be a great player for us. He has that attitude about him that's been missing from the defense for a long time, minus Suh. He showed that in the Minnesota game and against a paper towel dispenser at the airport in Wisconsin. I completely agree. He's a ferocious dude. He should be making a pretty big jump this year in terms of production. Quote Link to comment
DTrain2020 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 I feel like this picture isn't getting enough love! Quote Link to comment
Chaddyboxer Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 I feel like this picture isn't getting enough love! "Hey! Eric! What's your diet consist of?" Eric Martin: "Eating quarterbacks for lunch. NOM NOM NOM!" Quote Link to comment
huskerjack23 Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 According to last year's stats, Nebraska could see a 30 place improvement in Sacks and TFL's. Of course, going from 84th to about 60th, and 112th to about 85th, isn't exactly a return to aggressiveness. Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 According to last year's stats, Nebraska could see a 30 place improvement in Sacks and TFL's. That made no sense. They could also see an 83 place improvement or a 30 place decrease. What are you basing your seemingly random number on? Quote Link to comment
RedRedJarvisRedwine Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 According to last year's stats, Nebraska could see a 30 place improvement in Sacks and TFL's. That made no sense. They could also see an 83 place improvement or a 30 place decrease. What are you basing your seemingly random number on? I'm cornfused! So are we better or not?!? Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted August 17, 2012 Share Posted August 17, 2012 According to last year's stats, Nebraska could see a 30 place improvement in Sacks and TFL's. That made no sense. They could also see an 83 place improvement or a 30 place decrease. What are you basing your seemingly random number on? I'm cornfused! So are we better or not?!? "according to last year's stats" we're precisely 30 places better, because... Something. (it's possible Jack has a great point in there somewhere. It just wasn't loquationized well. I know that isn't a word but I've made it a word now) Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.