Guy Chamberlin Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 Rotating two seemingly competent quarterbacks as replacements for your injured starter is one of the least f'ing things to be so f'ing pissed about concerning this f'ing team. O-f'ing-kay? Link to comment
suh_fan93 Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 I had some big reservations about juggling 2 QBs around, but Kellogg more than impressed me. This coming from a guy who's been raving about TA and excited about what he can bring since his recruitment. I'm a little stunned at what we appear to have in a walk-on pocket passer. Those guys don't grow on trees, but Ronnie ran a smooth offense out there and throws a pretty ball. As for what Tim Beck said, why really tip your hand to the opponent when you don't have to? Let 'em worry about both. Agree. I loved what I saw of RKIII and I say play them both also. We're not ranked, we're most likely not going to win the Big 10 championship. We really have nothing to lose at this point so why not. If one guy isn't having the greatest game then just stick with the other. Link to comment
MichiganDad3 Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 There is no disadvantage by preparing for TA 7 RK. They both throw equally well, and RK can't run. By preparing for TA, you are prepared for RK. Link to comment
HuskerShark Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 I've never understood why fans and media feel entitled to know every detail about the team. There's a reason good coaches keep things quiet. Link to comment
Goal-line Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 Pick one QB and go with him until circumstances dictate differently. Spring and fall camp are the places to play around with personnel. Trying to keep both Kellogg and Armstrong "happy" will only lead to more trouble down the road. Athletes need to understand their position on the team, why they have that position and what that job description entails. If you are the backup, then accept that role, prepare diligently to take over in an emergency and help the team spirit in showing unquestioned support to the guy in the number one spot. Not all that hard to understand. As a coach, you should go with the guy who provides you with the best chance of winning. Link to comment
scarletNcream Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 I say play them both. I think Pelini and Beck missed the boat not starting RK3 as good PR for the walk-on program. Not to mention all the years he spent behind Taylor, he earned it. 1 Link to comment
sd'sker Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 is this one of those things where you already do not like bo pelini, so anything and everything he does is going to rub you the wrong way? like, if bo did this, but had an undefeated season so far and won the B1G last year you would not care? Link to comment
jmfb Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 http://sports.omaha....s/#.Ukt8zcHn_IU The part in this article where Tim Beck says he may use both Armstrong & Kellogg against Illinois if Martinez is out is what got me. I am tired of this bulls%^$. Yeah, I understand using them both against South Dakota State, even though I didn't really like how early we took Armstrong out when he had the offense rolling his first two drives. That said, conference play is starting. This is not a freaking joke. If Taylor Martinez is not going to start, then either declare Tommy Armstrong the starter or declare Ron Kellogg the starter. I really don't care which. If we f*&^ing d&^k around against Illinois, we will f*&^ing lose. This isnt Pop Warner football where we are trying to freaking spare peoples feeliings This is a mulit milllion dollar long term enterprise GROW UP StartTA he is the best player now- he can RUN AND PASS- RK cant run and for the record was a very mediocre QB at Westside- GLAD he is with us, but he doesnt have starters talent AND TA is the future of the program This isnt YMCA FOOTBALL!!! Link to comment
Mavric Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 No, Imani won't be playing QB. I feel pretty confident in that. 1 Link to comment
suh_fan93 Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 http://sports.omaha....s/#.Ukt8zcHn_IU The part in this article where Tim Beck says he may use both Armstrong & Kellogg against Illinois if Martinez is out is what got me. I am tired of this bulls%^$. Yeah, I understand using them both against South Dakota State, even though I didn't really like how early we took Armstrong out when he had the offense rolling his first two drives. That said, conference play is starting. This is not a freaking joke. If Taylor Martinez is not going to start, then either declare Tommy Armstrong the starter or declare Ron Kellogg the starter. I really don't care which. If we f*&^ing d&^k around against Illinois, we will f*&^ing lose. This isnt Pop Warner football where we are trying to freaking spare peoples feeliings This is a mulit milllion dollar long term enterprise GROW UP StartTA he is the best player now- he can RUN AND PASS- RK cant run and for the record was a very mediocre QB at Westside- GLAD he is with us, but he doesnt have starters talent AND TA is the future of the program This isnt YMCA FOOTBALL!!! Link to comment
commando Posted October 2, 2013 Share Posted October 2, 2013 is angry husker mocking Bo's rant? Link to comment
Recommended Posts