DevoHusker Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 1 hour ago, Archy1221 said: So...they recommend extortion. I also doubt that Joe wants to utilize that tactic, because it would definitely hit close to home for him. 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 8 minutes ago, DevoHusker said: So...they recommend extortion. I also doubt that Joe wants to utilize that tactic, because it would definitely hit close to home for him. True. 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted September 9, 2021 Share Posted September 9, 2021 18 minutes ago, DevoHusker said: So...they recommend extortion. I also doubt that Joe wants to utilize that tactic, because it would definitely hit close to home for him. It's an idiotic and disgusting idea to even tweet out. Link to comment
B.B. Hemingway Posted September 13, 2021 Share Posted September 13, 2021 At some point, all this goes too far, right? 4 Link to comment
knapplc Posted September 13, 2021 Share Posted September 13, 2021 26 minutes ago, B.B. Hemingway said: At some point, all this goes too far, right? Piers Morgan *always* goes too far. It's his stock in trade. 1 2 Link to comment
B.B. Hemingway Posted September 13, 2021 Share Posted September 13, 2021 35 minutes ago, knapplc said: Piers Morgan *always* goes too far. It's his stock in trade. Not a Piers guy, at all, but I don't think he's the one that went to far here. I'd give that honor to the fella beating up a woman. 1 1 1 Link to comment
knapplc Posted September 13, 2021 Share Posted September 13, 2021 31 minutes ago, B.B. Hemingway said: Not a Piers guy, at all, but I don't he's the one that went to far here. I'd give that honor to the fella beating up a woman. And here I thought the objection was because Morgan errantly refers to one of the fighters as a man. Link to comment
B.B. Hemingway Posted September 13, 2021 Share Posted September 13, 2021 22 minutes ago, knapplc said: And here I thought the objection was because Morgan errantly refers to one of the fighters as a man. Well, he is one, so.... I'm just following the science. 2 1 1 Link to comment
knapplc Posted September 13, 2021 Share Posted September 13, 2021 9 minutes ago, B.B. Hemingway said: Well, he is one, so.... I'm just following the science. Did we learn nothing from the whole Making Chimichangas era? Link to comment
B.B. Hemingway Posted September 13, 2021 Share Posted September 13, 2021 9 minutes ago, knapplc said: Did we learn nothing from the whole Making Chimichangas era? What about them? I remember them and their situation, but not the specifics. I don't take issue with transgender folks, until they start expecting us to willfully ignore biological truths. And it has the potential to ruin women's sports at all levels. It's possible to sympathize with their issues, AND push back where needed. 3 1 Link to comment
knapplc Posted September 13, 2021 Share Posted September 13, 2021 6 minutes ago, B.B. Hemingway said: What about them? I remember them and their situation, but not the specifics. I don't take issue with transgender folks, until they start expecting us to willfully ignore biological truths. And it has the potential to ruin women's sports at all levels. It's possible to sympathize with their issues, AND push back where needed. It's also possible to refer to people by their preferred pronouns. It's easy. You have to try to do it wrong. Link to comment
B.B. Hemingway Posted September 13, 2021 Share Posted September 13, 2021 17 minutes ago, knapplc said: It's also possible to refer to people by their preferred pronouns. It's easy. You have to try to do it wrong. Sure. And I have, though I haven't encountered the situation a ton. There has to be some understanding on their end as well. They're the one's pushing back on millions of years of undeniable truths. What they want, doesn't change what is. 2 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted September 13, 2021 Share Posted September 13, 2021 23 minutes ago, B.B. Hemingway said: What about them? I remember them and their situation, but not the specifics. I don't take issue with transgender folks, until they start expecting us to willfully ignore biological truths. And it has the potential to ruin women's sports at all levels. It's possible to sympathize with their issues, AND push back where needed. My question for those people is this: if a man can just decide he is a women one day and then compete is women’s sports..then why can’t a Caucasian one day decide they are African American or American Indian and then they can apply for more school scholarships, or free lifetime hunting/fishing licenses. Or why can’t someone who is 50 identify as a senior citizen and get the discounts. Can anyone tell me why one is acceptable and the others wouldn’t be. 1 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted September 13, 2021 Share Posted September 13, 2021 Just now, B.B. Hemingway said: Sure. And I have, though I haven't encountered the situation a ton. There has to be some understanding on their end as well. They're the one's pushing back on millions of years of undeniable truths. What they want, doesn't change what is. To your point, Just because someone wants to be called she/her, doesn’t actually make them a female. 2 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts