Mavric Posted September 9, 2022 Author Share Posted September 9, 2022 Solid play by Hausmann. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted September 9, 2022 Author Share Posted September 9, 2022 And then not so good from Hausmann. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted September 9, 2022 Author Share Posted September 9, 2022 No idea why Farmer did such a good job of going with the TE on the play before then totally turns him loose here. Quote Link to comment
Huskerfollower4life Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 7 minutes ago, Mavric said: I mean ... it shouldn't have been marked as a first down. But if you're giving so much cushion that a simple slat converts on 3rd & 12, that's poor. That is what is so frustrating for the season for me is the soft coverages in general. Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 30 minutes ago, Mavric said: And then not so good from Hausmann. Is this really on him? Looks like he has contain and 28 was supposed to fill that hole. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted September 9, 2022 Author Share Posted September 9, 2022 Just now, BigRedBuster said: Is this really on him? Looks like he has contain and 28 was supposed to fill that hole. Yeah, you could be right. 1 Quote Link to comment
big_red_husker_01 Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 anyone know why Frosty kept calling timeouts on ND's last drive (I think it was first half)? It gave them enough time to score, which they otherwise wouldnt have How do you like the aggressiveness of Frosts onside kicks 2 Quote Link to comment
Husker in WI Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 31 minutes ago, big_red_husker_01 said: anyone know why Frosty kept calling timeouts on ND's last drive (I think it was first half)? It gave them enough time to score, which they otherwise wouldnt have How do you like the aggressiveness of Frosts onside kicks They had plenty of time to score without us using our timeouts, they had their own and plenty of time. He wanted to save enough time for our offense but the D couldn't get off the field. And is the second one a joke? Just flip to the NW game thread for fans thought on the onside kick. The one against ND was a squib kick that hit a dude, low risk high reward. Quote Link to comment
Lorewarn Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 17 minutes ago, Husker in WI said: They had plenty of time to score without us using our timeouts, they had their own and plenty of time. He wanted to save enough time for our offense but the D couldn't get off the field. 100% right and anyone peddling otherwise is revealing really piss poor awareness Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted September 9, 2022 Author Share Posted September 9, 2022 I mean .... underthrowing him and giving him a chance is 100x better than overthrowing him where he has no chance. But is it too much to ask to get it to him *somewhat* in stride, at least once in awhile? At least not have to stop and come back for it? Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted September 9, 2022 Author Share Posted September 9, 2022 Chicken salad right here. Pure chicken salad. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted September 9, 2022 Author Share Posted September 9, 2022 Hey! The overload finally got them. Though I'm not so sure it was the overload as much as it was Boerkicher was originally lined up as an ineligible receiver then we shifted to make him eligible. Quote Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 1 hour ago, Lorewarn said: 100% right and anyone peddling otherwise is revealing really piss poor awareness It’s also quite possible ND would have been content playing it safe, conservative play calls of Frost doesn’t call time out and going into the locker room happy with a close game at that point. once Frost calls a timeout then they have to play for a first down and once they get that one with plenty of time and some momentum they decide to open it up. 1 Quote Link to comment
Husker in WI Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 12 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: It’s also quite possible ND would have been content playing it safe, conservative play calls of Frost doesn’t call time out and going into the locker room happy with a close game at that point. once Frost calls a timeout then they have to play for a first down and once they get that one with plenty of time and some momentum they decide to open it up. We used our first timeout with a minute left and they were on our 14 with 2 timeouts of their own. They were already in field goal range, there was nothing more to "open up." Frost deserves blame for a lot of things, but using the timeouts is not one of them. Quote Link to comment
admo Posted September 9, 2022 Share Posted September 9, 2022 1 hour ago, Mavric said: I mean .... underthrowing him and giving him a chance is 100x better than overthrowing him where he has no chance. But is it too much to ask to get it to him *somewhat* in stride, at least once in awhile? At least not have to stop and come back for it? To hear that coming from you makes me sad face Really wasn't a catch-n-go even if it thrown perfectly perfect. I thought it was a nice play. With 2 games in, and IMO, we are kind of improving with our passing since the days of Taylor Magic, Armstrong, Tanner Lee, 2AM. Now if we throw screens 5-8 times a game, the completion stats would be off the hook awesome. I like that we throw downfield, take shots, and I would bet that this is the most accurate we have been to giving receivers' chances to make a play in recent memory. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.