HuskerExpat Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 Good luck to Johnny. Sorry it didn't work out for him and hope he finds someplace where he'll be good enough to play. Quote Link to comment
Savage Husker Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 Any ideas why Irons is leaving? Quote Link to comment
huKSer Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 Any ideas why Irons is leaving? It didn't Iron out? 5 Quote Link to comment
GSG Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 Any ideas why Irons is leaving? It didn't Iron out? Quote Link to comment
RedRedJarvisRedwine Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 I'm ok with JS moving on. He's had enough time to at the very least move up the depth chart and he has failed to do so. Good Luck in the future Johnny! Quote Link to comment
QMany Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 @HuskerExtraBC: Johnny Stanton told me he plans to play next fall at Saddleback College in Mission Viejo, California, then see what comes after that. Quote Link to comment
bleedNUred Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 Sad to see Stanton go, I had such high hopes for him when he came into the program and watching him on the Elite 11 camp with Dilfer. Good luck to Johnny and Glenn! Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 Good luck Johnny, sorry you got a raw deal here. Truly hope you make a name for yourself and make us regret letting you go. 1 Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 Good luck Johnny, sorry you got a raw deal here. Truly hope you make a name for yourself and make us regret letting you go. What are you talking about man? Raw deal? 3 Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 Good luck Johnny, sorry you got a raw deal here. Truly hope you make a name for yourself and make us regret letting you go. What are you talking about man? Raw deal? Well, as pointed out numerous times by numerous people, Bo and his staff couldn't properly develop QB's. Now that Riley is here it's too little too late. I'm still a fan of Stanton's, think he could have been something here. 1 Quote Link to comment
amhynes89 Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 So now we can have three kickers on scholie Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 So now we can have three kickers on scholie If one of them is automatic from 45 yards I'm fine with that Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted June 25, 2015 Share Posted June 25, 2015 Good luck Johnny, sorry you got a raw deal here. Truly hope you make a name for yourself and make us regret letting you go. What are you talking about man? Raw deal? Well, as pointed out numerous times by numerous people, Bo and his staff couldn't properly develop QB's. Now that Riley is here it's too little too late. I'm still a fan of Stanton's, think he could have been something here. I mean, he'd still have 3 full years. I don't think time was an issue. The 4-5 QBs ahead of him was the issue. 2 Quote Link to comment
Guy Chamberlin Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 If Riley had originally recruited Stanton while at Oregon State, and found him waiting here at his new job, there must have been something pretty unresolvable in Johnny Stanton to land him so far down the depth chart. Just a few months ago, a sizable contingent of Husker fans would have let Riley start Stanton start over Armstrong, no questions asked. Wouldn't call it a raw deal. Stanton clearly played himself out of contention. It may have been mental and hopefully fixable, but he'll only find that out elsewhere. 2 Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Good luck Johnny, sorry you got a raw deal here. Truly hope you make a name for yourself and make us regret letting you go. What are you talking about man? Raw deal? Well, as pointed out numerous times by numerous people, Bo and his staff couldn't properly develop QB's. Now that Riley is here it's too little too late. I'm still a fan of Stanton's, think he could have been something here. I mean, he'd still have 3 full years. I don't think time was an issue. The 4-5 QBs ahead of him was the issue. I think the Tommy Armstrong issue is the main reason. He seems to be starter by default and I get that completely. Darlington could easily place himself as the backup or even successor should TA go down. Just seems like deciding between AJ and Fyfe and Stanton is a tossup for the staff, or maybe not and that's that. I think Stanton's time frame for learning an offense is what held him back. Especially if we were still trying to teach TA to be Martinez. I had really hoped Riley's recruitment of Stanton would lead to something but alas it was not meant to be. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.