The Dude Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 By all accounts, Armstrong, Bush, and Darlington were the three guys the staff was looking for out of this group. Stanton was somewhere behind Fyfe, and maybe even Broekemeier. Quote Link to comment
irieboy8 Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 so with Irons gone does that mean that all those guys from Edna Karr have left Nebraska now?? I believe so... Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 so with Irons gone does that mean that all those guys from Edna Karr have left Nebraska now?? I believe so... Correct. Quote Link to comment
jmfb Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 For all of you who thought Stanton was the guy, was in the mix, was one of the top guys, could start You were wrong As he showed in Spring practice and the Spring game Quote Link to comment
Savage Husker Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 so with Irons gone does that mean that all those guys from Edna Karr have left Nebraska now?? I believe so...Correct. From '14, there's still Tyrin Ferguson Quote Link to comment
irieboy8 Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 I can understand Stanton... but I'm really intrigued by Irons.... i never really heard much from him (maybe for a reason) but from i did hear he was talented and had some ability... Was he homesick? Bummed all his friends are gone?? Hotter chicks back home?? who knows... Im sure DPE could really have taught him something Quote Link to comment
Redux Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 By all accounts, Armstrong, Bush, and Darlington were the three guys the staff was looking for out of this group. Stanton was somewhere behind Fyfe, and maybe even Broekemeier. There was just something about Bush I didn't like that I saw, something familiar. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted June 26, 2015 Author Share Posted June 26, 2015 Rumor is that he was told that he wouldn't be starting out on the 105-man roster How does that work as a scholarship player? I know being on scholarship doesn't guarantee playing time, but, is it pretty rare for someone in a position like him to not make the 105 for reasons other than injury/off-the-field? Transfer rumors don't shock me given the amount of bodies we have at QB, but, a lot of people were pretty high on this kid. I would say it's pretty rare, barring injury. That's 20 players not on scholarship before you have to leave a scholarship player off the list. I know we have a lot of QBs but that seems pretty odd to me. I'm not sure 20 non-scholarship players even see the field in a given year. So apparently that's the story. That seems really odd to me but I've said for quite awhile I thought he would transfer so it doesn't really matter. Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 By all accounts, Armstrong, Bush, and Darlington were the three guys the staff was looking for out of this group. Stanton was somewhere behind Fyfe, and maybe even Broekemeier. There was just something about Bush I didn't like that I saw, something familiar.Fair enough. That doesn't mean Johnny Stanton was anywhere in the mix, though. He wasn't. Not because of a raw deal he got, but because Armstrong, Bush, and Darlington are substantially better as D1 quarterbacks. Admittedly, that's not necessarily saying much. Heh. Quote Link to comment
ScottyIce Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Irons is what baffles me. He has been injured. I'm curious what his reason is. It would've been nice to keep that NOLA pipeline going, but hopefully having Ferguson makes that easy still. Quote Link to comment
Huskerzoo Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 I'm still a little baffled that bondi wasn't announced Quote Link to comment
Thanks_Tom RR Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 The fact that Irons leaving so closely after Tolbert was officially dismissed from the team gives me all the information I need as to why he is leaving. Quote Link to comment
onlyHskrfaninIL Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 they both left at 4:20 3 Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted June 26, 2015 Author Share Posted June 26, 2015 I'm still a little baffled that bondi wasn't announced Riley said he'd have an announcement next month on Bondi. I'd say he's gone, just waiting for something that they need to finalize it. Quote Link to comment
Minnesota_husker Posted June 26, 2015 Share Posted June 26, 2015 Saw someone mention that Sharp/Benning said we lose two more to get us to 81. Obviously we can assume Bondi is one of those, but who is the other? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.