Red Five Posted April 21, 2016 Share Posted April 21, 2016 Sam on the DL recruiting "misadventures" Of 25 defensive line prospects recruited to Lincoln from 2010 to 2014, 18 left the program before exhausting their playing eligibility. In fact, only five players remain on the Husker roster. Left program before exhausting eligibility (7) Jay Guy Tobi Okuyemi Donovan Vestal Walker Ashburn Todd Peat Jr. Max Pirman Greg McMullen Declared early for NFL draft (3) Vincent Valentine Maliek Collins Randy Gregory Transferred to another Division I program (5) Chase Rome Kevin Williams Aaron Curry Avery Moss Joe Keels Never made it to first fall camp (3) Ernest Suttles Dimarya Mixon DeAndre Wills Exhausted eligibility at Nebraska (2) Joseph Carter Jake Cotton (moved to offense) Still on the Husker roster (5) Kevin Maurice A.J. Natter Sedrick King Mick Stoltenberg Peyton Newell A lot more at the link -> http://www.omaha.com/huskers/huskers-defensive-line-misadventures-stretch-back-a-half-decade/article_178c465a-476d-5dc2-b347-931f0a8f909e.html 4 Quote Link to comment
Enhance Posted April 21, 2016 Share Posted April 21, 2016 OL and DL recruiting, and many of those recruits struggling to pan out, has been one of the biggest reasons Nebraska has been unable to get over the hump, imo. I've talked about it before, but obviously, it's really tough to put together great lines when you're either missing out on recruits or they just aren't panning out. Both lines had some big targets at times, too (Owa and Andrus Peat come to mind) but they never came here. The reason we're in the positions we're in right now is due in large part to the coaching change, imo. We lost four pretty big pieces to the DL, and one was just because he is ready to pursue life after football. At some point, Nebraska has to get beyond all of these bumps and put together better lines. I'm not saying any one particular thing is to blame, but recruits either failing to come here, not panning out or leaving the program early has been a consistent problem for years. 4 Quote Link to comment
NUance Posted April 21, 2016 Share Posted April 21, 2016 Of 25 defensive line prospects recruited to Lincoln from 2010 to 2014, 18 left the program before exhausting their playing eligibility. In fact, only five players remain on the Husker roster. Wow. That's a shocking stat. We'll never be great without a great D-line. The last great D-line we had was six years ago. 1 Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted April 21, 2016 Share Posted April 21, 2016 Wow, that's pretty shocking, in sum. VV/Maliek/RG were successes, though. McMullen and Kevin Williams were solid, and they *almost* made it to the end of their careers. Definitely some serious misses here, though; the DL issues have been long in the coming. It's all on Parella now. Quote Link to comment
Red Five Posted April 21, 2016 Author Share Posted April 21, 2016 Of 25 defensive line prospects recruited to Lincoln from 2010 to 2014, 18 left the program before exhausting their playing eligibility. In fact, only five players remain on the Husker roster. Wow. That's a shocking stat. We'll never be great without a great D-line. The last great D-line we had was six years ago. To take it a step further, of the HS defensive line recruits between 2010 and 2012, none of them exhausted their eligibility at DL. Quote Link to comment
ADS Posted April 21, 2016 Share Posted April 21, 2016 Defensive guru, am I right? 3 Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted April 21, 2016 Share Posted April 21, 2016 Parrella has a major job to do. Either side of the line should not be an area that a vast majority of your recruits don't complete their eligibility. It takes time to develop their bodies and game. Not having upper classmen hurts the team. 2 Quote Link to comment
Pedro Guerrero Posted April 21, 2016 Share Posted April 21, 2016 I was always confused on why they were never able to use Suh & Crick’s dominance to lure top DL guys to Lincoln. Quote Link to comment
ADS Posted April 21, 2016 Share Posted April 21, 2016 I was always confused on why they were never able to use Suh & Cricks dominance to lure top DL guys to Lincoln.They were going to create their own 4 and 5 stars. Quote Link to comment
darkhorse85 Posted April 21, 2016 Share Posted April 21, 2016 Well, to be fair, you can't tell which guys are going to whip their dong out in public when you're recruiting them. I just don't think that question gets asked often enough on the recruiting trail. Quote Link to comment
teachercd Posted April 21, 2016 Share Posted April 21, 2016 Quitters...all of them! 1 Quote Link to comment
Red Five Posted April 21, 2016 Author Share Posted April 21, 2016 I was always confused on why they were never able to use Suh & Crick’s dominance to lure top DL guys to Lincoln. I think Peat, Guy, and Rome were 4* guys with really good offer lists. They just didn't pan out. Quote Link to comment
famoustitles Posted April 21, 2016 Share Posted April 21, 2016 If memory serves me correct, none of the guys who transferred played any significant downs for the other school either. I think Aaron Curry might have been a back up at TCU but that's all I can think of. Correct me if I'm wrong Quote Link to comment
84HuskerLaw Posted April 21, 2016 Share Posted April 21, 2016 This is interesting certainly and clearly identifies something that must be attacked head on and with all due dilligence and deliberate speed. The Coaches need to find the issues and correct for them. One place that might be examined carefully would be to take a long, hard, serious look at each and every one of these recruits and talk with them and identify what went right and wrong with their recruitment, time here and why they left early. Perhaps the attrition rate is higher that many might expect across many team positions as well - I don't know. But these numbers are truly way to high it would seem. Coaching changes, coaching styles, etc. 1 Quote Link to comment
onlyHskrfaninIL Posted April 22, 2016 Share Posted April 22, 2016 Bo wasnt made to recruit 5 stars. The us vs the world mentality engrained in him wouldnt fly. Bo is the type of guy that needs adversity to exist. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.