Jump to content


The Republican Utopia


Recommended Posts



30 minutes ago, knapplc said:

The Party who rails against Sharia Law has no problem inflicting their similarly dated patriarchal belief system on America.

 

 

 

 

 

 

The way I read his response is:

 

”I can’t control my own penis when women are in the vicinity, and I don’t want them to force me to violate my marriage vows due to my inability to control my penis.” 

 

 

Ya. This is the type of guy who should be a governor. 

  • Plus1 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
3 hours ago, Moiraine said:

 

 

 

The way I read his response is:

 

”I can’t control my own penis when women are in the vicinity, and I don’t want them to force me to violate my marriage vows due to my inability to control my penis.” 

 

 

Ya. This is the type of guy who should be a governor. 

Actually that is not what it is about.  Do you think that is the reason Billy Graham initiated the rule?  No.  It was to avoid any opportunity of false accusation - which can occur with any public figure (male or female).  Secondarily it is to keep 'honest people honest'.  Or to put it in this context "Keep pure people pure".  Temptation comes for many reasons - not just an inability to

'control ones' penis'.  To create an environment where temptation cannot occur helps in the battle - as well as being self controlled and inwardly strong oneself. 

Link to comment
56 minutes ago, TGHusker said:

Actually that is not what it is about.  Do you think that is the reason Billy Graham initiated the rule?  No.  It was to avoid any opportunity of false accusation - which can occur with any public figure (male or female).  Secondarily it is to keep 'honest people honest'.  Or to put it in this context "Keep pure people pure".  Temptation comes for many reasons - not just an inability to

'control ones' penis'.  To create an environment where temptation cannot occur helps in the battle - as well as being self controlled and inwardly strong oneself. 

 

 

 

I don’t care about your rationalizations.

 

It’s not okay and it’s downright sexist and disgusting for him to require a female reporter to be accompanied by a male in order for her to be allowed. If you disagree with that there’s nothing for us to discuss.

 

False accusations are so rare it’s f#&%ing stupid to do it for that purpose and it’s not a good enough reason to be a sexist asshat.

 

The keeping honest people honest argument is bulls#!t. You do that by not being alone with someone you’re attracted to. What this a$$h@!e is doing is far different from that. 

  • Plus1 3
Link to comment
30 minutes ago, TGHusker said:

Actually that is not what it is about.  Do you think that is the reason Billy Graham initiated the rule?  No.  It was to avoid any opportunity of false accusation - which can occur with any public figure (male or female).  Secondarily it is to keep 'honest people honest'.  Or to put it in this context "Keep pure people pure".  Temptation comes for many reasons - not just an inability to

'control ones' penis'.  To create an environment where temptation cannot occur helps in the battle - as well as being self controlled and inwardly strong oneself. 

 

2 minutes ago, Moiraine said:

 

 

 

I don’t care about your rationalizations.

 

It’s not okay and it’s downright sexist and disgusting for him to require a female reporter to be accompanied by a male in order for her to be allowed. If you disagree with that there’s nothing for us to discuss.

 

Both of you are right.

 

TG is right about the motivation.  Moiraine is right that it's down right pathetic.  I understand Graham's motivation.  He went about handling the situation in a very bad way.

  • Plus1 3
Link to comment

22 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

 

 

Both of you are right.

 

TG is right about the motivation.  Moiraine is right that it's down right pathetic.  I understand Graham's motivation.  He went about handling the situation in a very bad way.

 

 

 

I’ve added a little to it.

 

If I’m a super famous man like Graham, I wouldn’t go hang out with a girl just the 2 of us by ourselves but that’s the extent to which I’d take it. False accusations are incredibly rare. I’d just make sure all other interactions are in public settings. 

 

What this a$$h@!e is doing is being an a$$h@!e.

  • Plus1 1
Link to comment
1 hour ago, TGHusker said:

Actually that is not what it is about.  Do you think that is the reason Billy Graham initiated the rule?  No.  It was to avoid any opportunity of false accusation - which can occur with any public figure (male or female).  Secondarily it is to keep 'honest people honest'.  Or to put it in this context "Keep pure people pure".  Temptation comes for many reasons - not just an inability to

'control ones' penis'.  To create an environment where temptation cannot occur helps in the battle - as well as being self controlled and inwardly strong oneself. 

By that logic shouldn't the male reporters also require a female escort so that there's no opportunity of false accusations of having a homosexual affair?

  • Plus1 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment

 

Also, this isn’t really about the Graham rule.

 

Quote

But Robison insisted that trackers are trying to get any footage that would make the candidate look bad.

16 minutes ago, RedDenver said:

By that logic shouldn't the male reporters also require a female escort so that there's no opportunity of false accusations of have a homosexual affair?

 

 

That entered my mind as well. 

Link to comment
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...