commando 8,976 Posted December 13, 2019 Report Share Posted December 13, 2019 when the judge is on the payroll of the defendant 1 Link to post
BigRedBuster 24,009 Posted December 13, 2019 Report Share Posted December 13, 2019 8 minutes ago, commando said: when the jury is on the payroll of the defendant 2 Link to post
Nebfanatic 6,316 Posted December 13, 2019 Report Share Posted December 13, 2019 5 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: William Barr ladies and gentlemen 2 Link to post
Danny Bateman 9,894 Posted December 13, 2019 Report Share Posted December 13, 2019 Literally quite dystopian. 1 Link to post
Notre Dame Joe 1,336 Posted December 13, 2019 Report Share Posted December 13, 2019 5 hours ago, Ulty said: If this were an actual jury trial in an actual court, any juror who showed such bias toward a defendant or explicitly stated that they refused to consider the evidence would be removed from the jury. Wouldn't it be amazing in the impeachment hearing if the Chief Justice disqualified any Senator who said this kind of nonsense? That would change everything. I don't think that could happen though. Any prosecutor who hid witnesses and made up his own crime wouldn't even get an indictment. Wouldn't it be a great day for the judiciary if Roberts simply dismissed the charges? I don't know if that can happen. 3 Link to post
commando 8,976 Posted December 13, 2019 Report Share Posted December 13, 2019 4 hours ago, Notre Dame Joe said: Any prosecutor who hid witnesses and made up his own crime wouldn't even get an indictment. Wouldn't it be a great day for the judiciary if Roberts simply dismissed the charges? I don't know if that can happen. ^^^^^^ propaganda works. 5 1 Link to post
Popular Post Ulty 4,917 Posted December 13, 2019 Popular Post Report Share Posted December 13, 2019 5 hours ago, Notre Dame Joe said: Any prosecutor who hid witnesses and made up his own crime wouldn't even get an indictment. You have long ago proven yourself to be intellectually dishonest and resistant to facts and reason. 10 Link to post
QMany 5,477 Posted December 13, 2019 Report Share Posted December 13, 2019 Former RNC Chairman. 2 1 Link to post
commando 8,976 Posted December 13, 2019 Report Share Posted December 13, 2019 forget everything else. i wonder how long it would take for republicans to call for an impeachment of a democrat who settled a court case for running a fraud university while he/she was president? or a fraud charity? plenty of other stuff...but trump has done that while in office. 2 Link to post
BigRedBuster 24,009 Posted December 13, 2019 Report Share Posted December 13, 2019 42 minutes ago, QMany said: Former RNC Chairman. Wow...from their own party's former chairman. What an incredible indication as to how the party has changed. What a time to be alive. What I'm wondering is, is there a way for Republicans like Moscow Mitch, who have openly expressed their love and devotion to the President and their intentions to not into this by following the oath, can be dismissed from the proceedings? 1 Link to post
Decoy73 1,098 Posted December 13, 2019 Report Share Posted December 13, 2019 6 hours ago, Notre Dame Joe said: Any prosecutor who hid witnesses and made up his own crime wouldn't even get an indictment. Wouldn't it be a great day for the judiciary if Roberts simply dismissed the charges? I don't know if that can happen. And defendants who defy subpoenas end up in jail. Wouldn’t that also be a great day, Joe? 2 Link to post
Nebfanatic 6,316 Posted December 13, 2019 Report Share Posted December 13, 2019 6 hours ago, Notre Dame Joe said: Any prosecutor who hid witnesses and made up his own crime wouldn't even get an indictment. Wouldn't it be a great day for the judiciary if Roberts simply dismissed the charges? I don't know if that can happen. WITSEC doesn't work when the person you are testifying against is POTUS Link to post
Recommended Posts