timmytbro Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 7 minutes ago, brophog said: We say that because we know the result. If we gave up 8 TDs in a row blitzing, we'd blame it on the blitzing. If we're all truthful with ourselves, we know we wouldn't be more content, even a little bit, if we did things differently. That wouldn't have happened.... J.T. got like 10 seconds in the pocket... Any QB would have torched us with our plan....Come on, stop defending these coaches. Why? Riley has been here 3 years, 3 years! we should be executing our game plans by year 3... Quote Link to comment
BIG ERN Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 27 minutes ago, teachercd said: I will...honestly, in college football there are a lot of schools where you can almost "hide", college baseball is the best for this but CFB is not far behind. "Hiding" at a D1 school requires only a few things... 1. Low expectations to begin with 2. Coach can't be HORRIBLE or AWESOME 3. Be NICE! (don't give people a reason to can you) You do that and you are set at a lot of schools for a long time. WSU, OSU, Miss St, Ole Miss, Vandy, NW, Purdue, Illinois, Indiana, Utah, Utah State, TT, ISU, KU, KSU, ASU, UA, UConn, UL, GT, UNC, NCST...then every Non-P5 school He also was given opportunities in the NFL and Nebraska. That's where the line wasn't drawn in the sand Quote Link to comment
teachercd Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 5 minutes ago, BIG ERN said: He also was given opportunities in the NFL and Nebraska. That's where the line wasn't drawn in the sand True...why he got canned at SD and why he is about to get canned at NU Quote Link to comment
brophog Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 24 minutes ago, 84HuskerLaw said: The biggest problem with execution is a lack of ability to execute it (i.e. too slow, too small, to clumsy, etc). The defensive side of the ball, more than the offensive side, is filled with guys that weren't ideally sized for their position. Michigan has a LBer now that reminds me a lot of Lavonte David....that guy supposedly too small to play every down at the position. David is having a great NFL career, and this guy probably will to, because of high motor, high aggressive, smart play. Some guys you just can't keep off the field, even if they're too small or only have one hand. Hustle solves a lot of defensive issues. Quote Link to comment
Nebhawk Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 Brophog is in a Riley phog. Its ok to keep finding ways to make this chat room more interesting and compelling for argument sakes. I agree with most on here about Riley and his lack of ability to coach up players. His best teams at Beaver town were when he had NFL talent at QB and at WR, and on occasion at RB. He can coach NFL skill to a point, but just not in the NFL. I don't like to go here often, but the old guy down south in Manhatten Kansas, coaches his players up and usually wins alot of the time. His recruiting classes range from anywhere in the 40's to upper 50's most years. He has his players ready to play, and they compete most times. So when I see people that think that this coach is just not got enough talent or needs more time to gather talent is just not right. Right? KSU is comparitive to Wazzu, in many ways, but anyway. Good coaches can coach up what they have to at least be competitve or want to be that. Quote Link to comment
InOmaha Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 2 hours ago, brophog said: Did he happen to say what the plan was? Hold OSU to 45 and keep his job? The players didn't execute the plan. Quote Link to comment
Nebhawk Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 I don't give Pellini any credit often, but he did coach up his players for the most part. He did coach his players better or at least they wanted to play hard most of the time. The talent gap showed up when we played real good teams. Almost like Riley, hope was lost before the game started. Quote Link to comment
Nebfanatic Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 9 minutes ago, Nebhawk said: I agree with most on here about Riley and his lack of ability to coach up players. His best teams at Beaver town were when he had NFL talent at QB and at WR, and on occasion at RB. Is it possible Riley and his staff developed those players into NFL talents? 1 Quote Link to comment
brophog Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 10 minutes ago, Nebhawk said: Brophog is in a Riley phog. What does that even mean? Quote Link to comment
Hayseed Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 And here I was calling Coast To Coast AM to tell them about the extraterrestrial event that caused OSU to score on every drive. Quote Link to comment
WhatDoIKnow Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 11 minutes ago, unlfan said: Wow, now the guy is throwing players under the bus. What a sad man. Can’t wait until he is canned and kicked out of here in disgrace. Bus? No, he's throwing them under the "boss". See the @timmytbro posts. Quote Link to comment
brophog Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 6 minutes ago, Hayseed said: And here I was calling Coast To Coast AM to tell them about the extraterrestrial event that caused OSU to score on every drive. I was going to, but I was afraid they might believe me. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted October 19, 2017 Author Share Posted October 19, 2017 2 hours ago, zoogs said: ^Really? Is that actually a true, defensible statement? Or are we high into "frame everything Riley has ever done in the worst possible light" hour? Because it's going to be pretty awkward when Frost talks about execution or engages in what might be called 'coachspeak' after a loss. Do you have any examples of when he talked about specific plays or schemes in any of his press conferences? Quote Link to comment
Hayseed Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 1 minute ago, Mavric said: Do you have any examples of when he talked about specific plays or schemes in any of his press conferences? Didn’t he sing ‘I’ve Been Working On the Railroad’ one time? That counts. Quote Link to comment
dvdcrr Posted October 19, 2017 Share Posted October 19, 2017 2 hours ago, CharBroiled said: I think the goal of the "bend-don't-break" defense is to not give up the big play. However, 8 to 10 yard chunks are OK because they aren't the big play. Eventually, the offense will run out of field because of the back of the endzone and get confused...or something. So it kind of executed. Kind of. The old "bend don't break" axiom is a nod to the days of ironman football when players went both ways. The idea was you give everything on offense , then on defense you give enough to shut down the other team after a first down or two, but you keep them out of the end zone. A player only has so much to give if they are going both ways for 4qtrs. Now if we are talking platoon football, then bend dont break is ridiculous. You simply "Destroy". 3 and out. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.