Decked Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 1 minute ago, ZRod said: All-in-all it took us another year but I'd say we upgraded. I mean it was fun watching JD, but we needed size and more weapons. JD and Wan’Dale would be very good additions but that’s almost too many mouths to feed. I don’t trust this staff would be able to get everyone the ball. Quote Link to comment
ZRod Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 1 minute ago, Decked said: JD and Wan’Dale would be very good additions but that’s almost too many mouths to feed. I don’t trust this staff would be able to get everyone the ball. Yeah that. Plus we'd barely have anyone above 5'10". Quote Link to comment
Decked Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 6 minutes ago, ZRod said: Yeah that. Plus we'd barely have anyone above 5'10". I think Wan’Dale would started above JD anyway. 1 1 Quote Link to comment
ZRod Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 25 minutes ago, Decked said: I think Wan’Dale would started above JD anyway. Maybe, he probably would have a slight edge by being more shifty. Quote Link to comment
krc1995 Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 We would have had a couple of guys capable of returning punts. 2 1 Quote Link to comment
ZRod Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 5 minutes ago, krc1995 said: We would have had a couple of guys capable of returning punts. That's the worst part of losing them. 2 Quote Link to comment
Decked Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 7 minutes ago, krc1995 said: We would have had a couple of guys capable of returning punts. With nobody to block for them. But at least we wouldn’t fumble. Quote Link to comment
Guy Chamberlin Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 5 minutes ago, Decked said: With nobody to block for them. But at least we wouldn’t fumble. JD and Wan'dale were both game-breakers. Of course we could use them. 1 Quote Link to comment
Decked Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 4 minutes ago, Guy Chamberlin said: JD and Wan'dale were both game-breakers. Of course we could use them. No disagreement from me. Just too many mouths. Quote Link to comment
Hilltop Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 1 hour ago, Decked said: I think Wan’Dale would started above JD anyway. I completely agree. He is more shifty and had a much better team attitude. Quote Link to comment
Decked Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 15 minutes ago, Hilltop said: I completely agree. He is more shifty and had a much better team attitude. More versatile too. Quote Link to comment
krc1995 Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 I 28 minutes ago, Hilltop said: I completely agree. He is more shifty and had a much better team attitude. The thing about JD was I’m not sure he wanted to play football. Apparently he loves lacrosse. I also think he hated the attention. Quote Link to comment
krc1995 Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 So no one missing Kade Warner? 2 Quote Link to comment
DefenderAO Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 5 minutes ago, krc1995 said: So no one missing Kade Warner? That Luke to Kade combo would've been killer. To coaching careers and home sellouts. 2 Quote Link to comment
krc1995 Posted October 2, 2021 Share Posted October 2, 2021 16 minutes ago, DefenderAO said: That Luke to Kade combo would've been killer. To coaching careers and home sellouts. He looks to be about 40 years old. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.