Archy1221 Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 57 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: I wish it were someone else too. But, if it's between him and Trump, the decision is clear. Neither and write in If both parties voters that didn’t vote in the primary (80% of voters) would get organized with write in campaigns we can do this!!! 2 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted February 7 Share Posted February 7 2 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: Neither and write in If both parties voters that didn’t vote in the primary (80% of voters) would get organized with write in campaigns we can do this!!! I did that in 2016 and look where that got us. Trump must be defeated. 1 1 1 3 Link to comment
TGHusker Posted February 7 Author Share Posted February 7 49 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: I did that in 2016 and look where that got us. Trump must be defeated. Sometimes a person just needs to be very, very pragmatic/ practical. There are many things I don't like about reelecting Biden but the Dems have given us no one else. It may very well in the end be a vote for a Harris presidency. But with that said, electing Trump is by far the worse possible choice. If I'm in a state where voting for a 3rd party candidate might inadvertently elect Trump - I'm running away from that 3rd party candidate - even if that person is preferred. We got to look at the greater good and in this election cycle, the greater good is to not elect trump. I hope the courts remove this threat but until that happens this is the only way to go IMHO. 4 Link to comment
nic Posted February 8 Share Posted February 8 https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna137823 Second dead world leader Biden claimed to have talked to in a week's time. I wonder what his handlers say to him after the speech. If he does it again I am going to start believing him. 1 1 Link to comment
nic Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 https://www.cnn.com/ Hmm. This sounds familiar. Justice Elena Kagan questioned the implications of a single state banning a candidate in a presidential election. “Why should a single state have the ability to make this determination not only for their own citizens, but for the rest of the nation?” Kagan asked. Hmm. So does this... Kavanaugh questioned why Trump should be removed from the ballot when he has not been convicted of inciting an insurrection. Kavanaugh noted there was a federal statute for insurrection and that Trump had not been charged with it, 1 2 Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 Well, I’ve now heard Republicans argue both that Trump shouldn’t be convicted during impeachment for high crimes and misdemeanors because that’s what elections are for and that we should now elect Trump again because he hasn’t been convicted of any crimes. Well played, douchebags. 2 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted February 9 Share Posted February 9 17 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said: She has a point. That’s not Jill Biden 1 1 1 Link to comment
Loebarth Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 As Sad as It Is but the Truth sometimes hurts and the 2024 election is nothing but pain.... I'm not the most intelligent person and maybe that's why this made me almost spit my dew out this morning... 1 1 1 Link to comment
Scarlet Posted February 10 Share Posted February 10 39 minutes ago, Loebarth said: I'm not the most intelligent person Correct 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts