Jump to content


Choi not starting? Really?


Recommended Posts



I think Osborne may have said something like that once, but no coach would make that a hard and fast rule. Nate Mason was starting QB when he went down for the season in 1981. Turner Gill took over a couple games later, and there was no doubt that he was going to stay #1 when Mason came back. If somebody comes in and plays at a higher level than the injured player had been, they are going to continue to start. I like what I've seen in Choi, but I don't coach and evaluate players for a living.

Link to comment

I think this is a non-issue. I'd bet Choi and ARod get about 50/50 snaps. Does it really matter which one is out there first? If ARod doesn't play as well as Choi and gets more than 50% of the snaps, then we can talk about that. But let's wait and see what happens first. Same thing for Moore/Marcel.

 

It will matter if Arod gets blown up in the first series and directly causes Tmart to get injured or worse turn the ball over.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

Visit the Sports Illustrated Husker site



×
×
  • Create New...