IllinoisHuskerFan Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 Never deny an athlete like this a spot on your team Its not the X's and the O's but the Jimmy's and Joe's 1 Link to comment
ObamaRocks91 Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 If we wants to be a receiver, then I want him N a little less. I would love to have him as a safety though. Maybe the staff already knows we are getting some 4-5-star DB recruit that will move to safety from arizona that is high on us??? That way there would be no need for Dixon to be at safety. Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 Dixon stated his top four: Nebraska, Arizona State, TCU and Houston. Wants to be a WR and that's what the schools are recruiting him for. I understand the kid may have some qualification issues... But does that top 4 make ANY SENSE? If you look at it purely from a success on the field standpoint, we blow the other 3 schools away RIGHT NOW. My guess is location and WOMENZZZ are being taken into account on this one though. Link to comment
SeattleHuskers Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 I can understand the first three, but Houston? Link to comment
dylan Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 I can understand the first three, but Houston? Location, location, location. Early playing time in what has historically been a wide open passing attack doesn't hurt, but never underestimate the role location plays in choosing a college (just like it does for most non-atletes). Link to comment
PaulCrewe Posted December 6, 2012 Share Posted December 6, 2012 As others have said you take him. Alonzo moore 2.0 with the ball in his hands. The staff is fully onboard with the receiver idea. Link to comment
HuskerShark Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 I still think Alonzo Moore ought to be on defense. Hopefully he proves me wrong by cracking some playing time next year and showing what he is capable of with the ball in his hands. Link to comment
MLB 51 Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Great talent. If he wants to play offense, you let him. Link to comment
HuskerShark Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Great talent. If he wants to play offense, you let him. Agreed. I am just seeing our area of desperate need as the defense, and he's needed more over there. Link to comment
MLB 51 Posted December 7, 2012 Share Posted December 7, 2012 Great talent. If he wants to play offense, you let him. Agreed. I am just seeing our area of desperate need as the defense, and he's needed more over there. We have some good talent coming in, and on roster. Not worried. See your point though. Link to comment
MLB 51 Posted December 31, 2012 Share Posted December 31, 2012 Great talent. If he wants to play offense, you let him. Agreed. I am just seeing our area of desperate need as the defense, and he's needed more over there. We have some good talent coming in, and on roster. Not worried. See your point though. Announcing tonight. Link to comment
flatwaterfan Posted December 31, 2012 Share Posted December 31, 2012 Hope he recommits. Kind of like Alonzo Moore. A good athlete that can play anywhere. Link to comment
HuskerFowler Posted December 31, 2012 Share Posted December 31, 2012 I think he had his chance, we really want Clark as our slot reciever and we are only going to take 3...we got our 2 outside guys. Wouldnt be opposed to taking him if he wanted to come thou, alot of spots to fill. Think we could take 28-30 if we wanted. Link to comment
EZ-E Posted December 31, 2012 Share Posted December 31, 2012 With the room we have it would be silly not to take him. Link to comment
Ed Helms Posted December 31, 2012 Share Posted December 31, 2012 Would love to bring him in as a DB, but he might be set on being a WR. Link to comment
Recommended Posts