girlknowsfootball Posted November 25, 2012 Share Posted November 25, 2012 He's a true 6'2" 206.... that's a big RB! Link to comment
Haspula Posted November 25, 2012 Share Posted November 25, 2012 He's a true 6'2" 206.... that's a big RB! he might end up being 6'1 or 6'0. Seems like every prospect always is 1-2 inches less than there height listed on rivals (From 2012 westerkamp,michael rose, mcmullen, leroy alexander, moss, whitaker). Everyone other than whitaker and rose where off by 2 inches. Link to comment
jamrinelli Posted November 25, 2012 Share Posted November 25, 2012 I am excited to see this guy play but I would def love to have one more back this recruiting class!!! Link to comment
HuskerHacker Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 I'm hoping we red shirt Taylor and say Kemp. Our IB depth offers us this luxury right now. Taylor's size Kemp's shiftiness Red Shirt the two as well as Johnny and set ourselves up for years of title runs... (Bo and Staff are doing things right, building depth so we don't rebuild, we reload and the players being recruited deserve some accolades for being patient and trusting the staff.) Great to be a Husker isn't it? Link to comment
The Maudfather Posted November 26, 2012 Share Posted November 26, 2012 Adrian Peterson My first thoughts when I watched his film, as well. Link to comment
Mavric Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 He's a true 6'2" 206.... that's a big RB! he might end up being 6'1 or 6'0. Seems like every prospect always is 1-2 inches less than there height listed on rivals (From 2012 westerkamp,michael rose, mcmullen, leroy alexander, moss, whitaker). Everyone other than whitaker and rose where off by 2 inches. That's probably not a big deal. 6-2 is getting fairly tall for a RB. Closer to 6-0 wouldn't be a problem at all. Link to comment
HUSKER FREAK Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 Adrian Peterson My first thoughts when I watched his film, as well. I wouldn't mind that at all:-) Link to comment
Hammerhead Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 He's a true 6'2" 206.... that's a big RB! he might end up being 6'1 or 6'0. Seems like every prospect always is 1-2 inches less than there height listed on rivals (From 2012 westerkamp,michael rose, mcmullen, leroy alexander, moss, whitaker). Everyone other than whitaker and rose where off by 2 inches. That's probably not a big deal. 6-2 is getting fairly tall for a RB. Closer to 6-0 wouldn't be a problem at all. There's nothing wrong with short running backs. If they're built right, they're very difficult to tackle. Maurice Jones-Drew is a good example. I've seen him light up some pretty big linebackers before. 6' even is a decent height for a RB though. Link to comment
lionsfan93 Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 He's a true 6'2" 206.... that's a big RB! he might end up being 6'1 or 6'0. Seems like every prospect always is 1-2 inches less than there height listed on rivals (From 2012 westerkamp,michael rose, mcmullen, leroy alexander, moss, whitaker). Everyone other than whitaker and rose where off by 2 inches. That's probably not a big deal. 6-2 is getting fairly tall for a RB. Closer to 6-0 wouldn't be a problem at all. I've that he is actually closer to 6'1 and not 6'2 Link to comment
HuskerShark Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 He's a true 6'2" 206.... that's a big RB! he might end up being 6'1 or 6'0. Seems like every prospect always is 1-2 inches less than there height listed on rivals (From 2012 westerkamp,michael rose, mcmullen, leroy alexander, moss, whitaker). Everyone other than whitaker and rose where off by 2 inches. That's probably not a big deal. 6-2 is getting fairly tall for a RB. Closer to 6-0 wouldn't be a problem at all. There's nothing wrong with short running backs. If they're built right, they're very difficult to tackle. Maurice Jones-Drew is a good example. I've seen him light up some pretty big linebackers before. 6' even is a decent height for a RB though. If a RB is 5'9" like Abdullah, he is easier to get lost behind blockers and spring free. Barry Sanders did the same thing. Link to comment
HuskerHacker Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 yes but don't get too enumerated in height. Consider, Hershal Walker, Eric Dickerson, Marcus Allen, Eddie George, just to name a few. This kid (AT) is a skilled and accomplished back within the highest level of High School competition in the country. I'm elated knowing he gave his verbal to doNU. Link to comment
ADS Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 This kid reminds me alot of Chris Brown from Colorado. The Chris Brown that ran for 10 touchdowns against a Craig Bohl defense. Link to comment
RedRedJarvisRedwine Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 He's a true 6'2" 206.... that's a big RB! he might end up being 6'1 or 6'0. Seems like every prospect always is 1-2 inches less than there height listed on rivals (From 2012 westerkamp,michael rose, mcmullen, leroy alexander, moss, whitaker). Everyone other than whitaker and rose where off by 2 inches. That's probably not a big deal. 6-2 is getting fairly tall for a RB. Closer to 6-0 wouldn't be a problem at all. There's nothing wrong with short running backs. If they're built right, they're very difficult to tackle. Maurice Jones-Drew is a good example. I've seen him light up some pretty big linebackers before. 6' even is a decent height for a RB though. Didnt MJD light up Terrell Suggs on a goal line play? Link to comment
jsneb83 Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 This kid reminds me alot of Chris Brown from Colorado. The Chris Brown that ran for 10 touchdowns against a Craig Bohl defense. So the Chris Brown that would beat up a defense, not the one that beat up his girlfriend. 2 Link to comment
Recommended Posts