LumberJackSker Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 This loss doesnt change the fact that we are a 10 win team capable of winning our division every year. Starting for a good 10 win team isnt a bad thing not too many people see teams that get 70 points dropped on them as being capable of anything we need a big performance in the bowl game, this kind of loss could follow nebraska throughout this recruiting class 1 Quote Link to comment
jsneb83 Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 This loss doesnt change the fact that we are a 10 win team capable of winning our division every year. Starting for a good 10 win team isnt a bad thing not too many people see teams that get 70 points dropped on them as being capable of anything we need a big performance in the bowl game, this kind of loss could follow nebraska throughout this recruiting class Clemson? 1 Quote Link to comment
EZ-E Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 I pride myself on being a logical guy, but this a a 100% must get. QR needs to be a Husker. Quote Link to comment
LumberJackSker Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 This loss doesnt change the fact that we are a 10 win team capable of winning our division every year. Starting for a good 10 win team isnt a bad thing not too many people see teams that get 70 points dropped on them as being capable of anything we need a big performance in the bowl game, this kind of loss could follow nebraska throughout this recruiting class Clemson? damn Clemson Quote Link to comment
Haspula Posted December 3, 2012 Share Posted December 3, 2012 I pride myself on being a logical guy, but this a a 100% must get. QR needs to be a Husker. Along with 2 other DTs Quote Link to comment
papio2chi Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Down to 3: Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Texas Tech ...Tech may be behind because of the coaching change though. Quote Link to comment
MLB 51 Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 Down to 3: Nebraska, Oklahoma, and Texas Tech ...Tech may be behind because of the coaching change though. OU needs D-Line help as bad as we do. Quote Link to comment
TheRedCarver Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 He is a four star 90 rating on 247. FWIW Quote Link to comment
ndobney Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 I get the feeling this might be the silent DT JUCO commit!! Quote Link to comment
ndobney Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 I actually love this kid. I think he could be a good one. Great size almost a DT/NT hybrid, and we all know Bo loves hybrids. We need size at this position and Russell gives us that. Bo is looking for speed, but at the DT/NT position we need size. I would love to play to 300 plus lb DT's, which will allow us to get away with the 250 lbs DE's Bo is going with. I could see him going to a NT/DT middle front. I would love to see VV get some playing time along side Russell next year. We will be pushing them around next year!! Plus Russell has decent speed for his size as well!! Quote Link to comment
LumberJackSker Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 I actually love this kid. I think he could be a good one. Great size almost a DT/NT hybrid, and we all know Bo loves hybrids. We need size at this position and Russell gives us that. Bo is looking for speed, but at the DT/NT position we need size. I would love to play to 300 plus lb DT's, which will allow us to get away with the 250 lbs DE's Bo is going with. I could see him going to a NT/DT middle front. I would love to see VV get some playing time along side Russell next year. We will be pushing them around next year!! Plus Russell has decent speed for his size as well!! just imagine this guy lined up next to mr valentine, they would take up a lot of space Quote Link to comment
IllinoisHuskerFan Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 With the talent we will have returning in the secondary next year getting a couple of these 300+ DTs to help collapse the middle of the pocket will be huge. If you do that with the speed of next years LBs we all of a sudden have a defense that could make serious improvements from this years....but these are all "IF's" if we dont get a big or 2 in the middle! GBR!!! Quote Link to comment
LumberJackSker Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 With the talent we will have returning in the secondary next year getting a couple of these 300+ DTs to help collapse the middle of the pocket will be huge. If you do that with the speed of next years LBs we all of a sudden have a defense that could make serious improvements from this years....but these are all "IF's" if we dont get a big or 2 in the middle! GBR!!! collapse the pocket? would they be allowed to do that? maybe they'll be so good no matter the defensive strategy they'll just knock the offensive linemen over Quote Link to comment
IllinoisHuskerFan Posted December 10, 2012 Share Posted December 10, 2012 With the talent we will have returning in the secondary next year getting a couple of these 300+ DTs to help collapse the middle of the pocket will be huge. If you do that with the speed of next years LBs we all of a sudden have a defense that could make serious improvements from this years....but these are all "IF's" if we dont get a big or 2 in the middle! GBR!!! collapse the pocket? would they be allowed to do that? maybe they'll be so good no matter the defensive strategy they'll just knock the offensive linemen over sure that would work too... Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.