Red Five Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 I know nothing, but guys going to be seniors that I could see leaving (either "retiring" or looking the grad transfer route): T Allen (injuries derailed him) M Bondi (lost his job with the motorcycle incident) M Finnin (lashed out about Bo leaving) J Keels (hasn't seen the field) D Sutton (hasn't seen the field) And juniors S Cotton (Dad) K Maurice (playing time went way down last year) C Whitaker (injuries and hasn't seen the field) Quote Link to comment
Red Five Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Since then, we have heard about Rose's possible grade issues? Go on... Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Here's what I'm seeing now. I tried to order the guys in parenthesis by who we'd take. Supposedly we're taking four moe so someone's getting left out.LB - Looking for at least a couple more. I get the feeling we might be looking at Barry->Hall->Talan->Garbutt but I'm not sure. DE - Taking one. No idea what our order is.WR - Probably one moreOL - One more, probably OTLS - Looks like we're intent on taking one ------------------------------------QB - 0RB - 1 - OzigboWR - 2 - Morgan (Alston, Shorts)TE - 1 - SnyderOT - 1-2 - Gaylord (Paulo)OG/C - 2 - Decker, BarnettDT - 2 - C. Davis, K. DavisDE - 2 - Neal, (Bailey, Roberts, Davis)LB - 4 - Young, Ferguson (Barry, Talan, Hall, Garbutt)CB - 2 - Lee, AndersonS - 2 - Williams, Sykes LS - 1 - (Ober) Quote Link to comment
ScottyIce Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Since then, we have heard about Rose's possible grade issues? Go on... Everyone and their dog was asking questions about it on (tuesday?) night's recruiting chat with Josh. They refused to comment on it though. I would believe it to be grades, because that is the exact way everyone was wording their questions about it. No one was asking what is going on with other situations, it was strictly academic questions. Then on Sharp & Benning yesterday morning, they were talking about the mess we have at linebacker once spring practices start. Stating, "Rose has some things to take care of" I believe that was the quote. Quote Link to comment
Minnesota_husker Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Here's what I'm seeing now. I tried to order the guys in parenthesis by who we'd take. Supposedly we're taking four moe so someone's getting left out. LB - Looking for at least a couple more. I get the feeling we might be looking at Barry->Hall->Talan->Garbutt but I'm not sure. DE - Taking one. No idea what our order is. WR - Probably one more OL - One more, probably OT LS - Looks like we're intent on taking one ------------------------------------ QB - 0 RB - 1 - Ozigbo WR - 2 - Morgan (Alston, Shorts) TE - 1 - Snyder OT - 1-2 - Gaylord (Paulo) OG/C - 2 - Decker, Barnett DT - 2 - C. Davis, K. Davis DE - 2 - Neal, (Bailey, Roberts, Davis) LB - 4 - Young, Ferguson (Barry, Talan, Hall, Garbutt) CB - 2 - Lee, Anderson S - 2 - Williams, Sykes LS - 1 - (Ober) You forgot Kaiwan Lewis. Quote Link to comment
ADS Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 "Things to take care of" could mean a lot of things, like rehab. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 You forgot Kaiwan Lewis. I left him off because it's not certain that he'll make his decision by NSD and the speculation is we're looking to get 19 when we could get 20 because we are saving one spot for Lewis. Quote Link to comment
Amac3309 Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Since then, we have heard about Rose's possible grade issues? Go on... Everyone and their dog was asking questions about it on (tuesday?) night's recruiting chat with Josh. They refused to comment on it though. I would believe it to be grades, because that is the exact way everyone was wording their questions about it. No one was asking what is going on with other situations, it was strictly academic questions. Then on Sharp & Benning yesterday morning, they were talking about the mess we have at linebacker once spring practices start. Stating, "Rose has some things to take care of" I believe that was the quote. I assumed it was Jonathan rose not Michael Quote Link to comment
ScottyIce Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Not the way I saw it. Quote Link to comment
Atbone95 Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Tariq Allen won't (and we should all hope, shouldn't) leave - dude is a serious talent if he's healthy. Also, maybe just another slip up - OWH listed Lorenzo Stewart as a "current Cornhusker" in an article about Willie Sykes yesterday. What's anyone think of that? Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 I read this article yesterday and now they are talking about this kid on the radio. There is a big part of me that wants this kid. LINK It's crazy that he has zero offers. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Tariq Allen won't (and we should all hope, shouldn't) leave - dude is a serious talent if he's healthy. Also, maybe just another slip up - OWH listed Lorenzo Stewart as a "current Cornhusker" in an article about Willie Sykes yesterday. What's anyone think of that? Stewart tweet Husker-related stuff from time to time so I think he still really wants to be here. But it seems like the new staff prefers bigger backs so I'm not sure they'll be interested. Quote Link to comment
Atbone95 Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Tariq Allen won't (and we should all hope, shouldn't) leave - dude is a serious talent if he's healthy. Also, maybe just another slip up - OWH listed Lorenzo Stewart as a "current Cornhusker" in an article about Willie Sykes yesterday. What's anyone think of that? Stewart tweet Husker-related stuff from time to time so I think he still really wants to be here. But it seems like the new staff prefers bigger backs so I'm not sure they'll be interested. Jacquizz Rodgers and Mike Riley disagree. Just seemed weird that the OWH said "current" - wonder if they know something we all don't or if it was an honest mistake. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Tariq Allen won't (and we should all hope, shouldn't) leave - dude is a serious talent if he's healthy. Also, maybe just another slip up - OWH listed Lorenzo Stewart as a "current Cornhusker" in an article about Willie Sykes yesterday. What's anyone think of that? Stewart tweet Husker-related stuff from time to time so I think he still really wants to be here. But it seems like the new staff prefers bigger backs so I'm not sure they'll be interested. Jacquizz Rodgers and Mike Riley disagree. Just seemed weird that the OWH said "current" - wonder if they know something we all don't or if it was an honest mistake. Yeah, they had one guy a decade ago who didn't fit that mold. But I'm pretty sure they even said after they got here that the prefer bigger backs. I believe the new staff has offered four backs since they started. They are 6-2 & 210, 5-10 & 200, 5-11 & 200 and 5-11 & 220. Stewart is 5-6 & 165. Quote Link to comment
Atbone95 Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Tariq Allen won't (and we should all hope, shouldn't) leave - dude is a serious talent if he's healthy. Also, maybe just another slip up - OWH listed Lorenzo Stewart as a "current Cornhusker" in an article about Willie Sykes yesterday. What's anyone think of that? Stewart tweet Husker-related stuff from time to time so I think he still really wants to be here. But it seems like the new staff prefers bigger backs so I'm not sure they'll be interested. Jacquizz Rodgers and Mike Riley disagree. Just seemed weird that the OWH said "current" - wonder if they know something we all don't or if it was an honest mistake. Yeah, they had one guy a decade ago who didn't fit that mold. But I'm pretty sure they even said after they got here that the prefer bigger backs. I believe the new staff has offered four backs since they started. They are 6-2 & 210, 5-10 & 200, 5-11 & 200 and 5-11 & 220. Stewart is 5-6 & 165. The plan with Stewart from the beginning was a slot WR type role IIRC. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.