BigRedBuster Posted January 29, 2017 Share Posted January 29, 2017 There used to be a certain car dealership on O street that "employed" football players in the 80s. Quote Link to comment
GBRFAN Posted January 29, 2017 Share Posted January 29, 2017 Why did we not offer Jafar Armstrong? 4 star WR out of Mizzou I think I'm happy with our WRs. Plus this thread is about what might of happened in the 90's.... oh wait it is about 2017 recruiting - how convenient!!! Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 29, 2017 Share Posted January 29, 2017 Why did we not offer Jafar Armstrong? 4 star WR out of MizzouI think I'm happy with our WRs.Would you be happier if we add a certain WR out of Cali on wednesday? Absolutely. Quote Link to comment
Hedley Lamarr Posted January 29, 2017 Share Posted January 29, 2017 Why did we not offer Jafar Armstrong? 4 star WR out of MizzouI think I'm happy with our WRs.Would you be happier if we add a certain WR out of Cali on wednesday?Absolutely. He is flipping from mizzou to Notre Dame with the late offer....just saying he would have been a good plan B to have visit this weekend Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 30, 2017 Share Posted January 30, 2017 Fun question. Right now on 247, we are ranked 24th and Texas is 25th. Which team finishes higher? Texas Well....we have moved up to 21 with 19 recruits and they have moved down to 28 with 15. Still stand by this prediction? Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 30, 2017 Share Posted January 30, 2017 Why did we not offer Jafar Armstrong? 4 star WR out of MizzouI think I'm happy with our WRs.Would you be happier if we add a certain WR out of Cali on wednesday?Absolutely. He is flipping from mizzou to Notre Dame with the late offer....just saying he would have been a good plan B to have visit this weekend I would be really happy with Lewis (which we aren't going to get). However, I'm still very happy with the WR class we have. Quote Link to comment
ADS Posted January 30, 2017 Share Posted January 30, 2017 Fun question. Right now on 247, we are ranked 24th and Texas is 25th. Which team finishes higher? Texas Well....we have moved up to 21 with 19 recruits and they have moved down to 28 with 15. Still stand by this prediction? Sure idk Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 30, 2017 Author Share Posted January 30, 2017 19 commits on our way to 22 (so they say). Sounds like we're looking for 1 WR, 1 DT, and 2 DBs which is four guys for three spots but we could go up to 25 guys.QB - 1 - TRISTAN GEBBIARB - 1 - JAYLIN BRADLEY, CJ VerdellFB - 1 - BEN MILESWR - 5 - KEYSHAWN JOHNSON Jr., JAEVON McQUITTY, TYJON LINDSEY, JAMIRE CALVIN, Joseph Lewis, Bryan Thompson, Jeremiah Hawkins TE - 2 - AUSTIN ALLEN, KURT RAFDALOT - 3 - BRENDEN JAIMES, MATT SICHTERMAN, CHRIS WALKEROG/C - 1 - BROC BANDODT - 3 - DEONTRE THOMAS, DEIONTAE WATTS, Damion DanielsDE - 1 - GUY THOMASLB - 3 - WILLIE HAMPTON, AVERY ROBERTS, ANDREW WARDCB - 1-2 - Deommodore Lenoir, Greg Johnson, Elijah Blades, Michael Onyemaobi, Tony WallaceS - 0-1 - Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 30, 2017 Share Posted January 30, 2017 Fun question. Right now on 247, we are ranked 24th and Texas is 25th. Which team finishes higher? Texas Well....we have moved up to 21 with 19 recruits and they have moved down to 28 with 15. Still stand by this prediction? Sure idk Not meaning to call you out on this. You just happened to be the only one that responded to my question. I have absolutely no clue what they have on the line for signing day. But, I'll go with us beating out Texas. Quote Link to comment
ADS Posted January 30, 2017 Share Posted January 30, 2017 Fun question. Right now on 247, we are ranked 24th and Texas is 25th. Which team finishes higher? Texas Well....we have moved up to 21 with 19 recruits and they have moved down to 28 with 15. Still stand by this prediction? Sure idk Not meaning to call you out on this. You just happened to be the only one that responded to my question. I have absolutely no clue what they have on the line for signing day. But, I'll go with us beating out Texas. They could potentially grab four 4 star prospects on NSD and a few more 3 stars. So they could make a push if everything goes their way. That's about all I know. Quote Link to comment
Enhance Posted January 30, 2017 Share Posted January 30, 2017 I would love some insight from those of you who follow recruiting more closely than me. As a casual recruiting observer, I feel right now like I have felt for years. It seems our highest touted recruits are skill position players. I understand this to be somewhat normal given their nature - everybody likes to hear and see the flashy quarterback, receiver and running back. They make the headlines. The super talented offensive lineman just doesn't bring the same fervor. But, is this standard or are we faltering in some of those key areas like the DL or the OL? Avery Roberts is one of the single most important players in the class in my opinion, but outside of him, there doesn't seem to be a lot of interest around guys like Bando, Watts or Sichterman. Is this because they're not at a level worthy of more recognition, or because they're not skill position players? Or, is it a combination of the two? Again, I feel like this is a pretty standard view among the casual follower of recruiting because we just don't hear a lot about some of the less flashy positions. Am I just a victim of water cooler conversation and media coverage here? Quote Link to comment
spurs1990 Posted January 30, 2017 Share Posted January 30, 2017 I would love some insight from those of you who follow recruiting more closely than me. As a casual recruiting observer, I feel right now like I have felt for years. It seems our highest touted recruits are skill position players. I understand this to be somewhat normal given their nature - everybody likes to hear and see the flashy quarterback, receiver and running back. They make the headlines. The super talented offensive lineman just doesn't bring the same fervor. But, is this standard or are we faltering in some of those key areas like the DL or the OL? Avery Roberts is one of the single most important players in the class in my opinion, but outside of him, there doesn't seem to be a lot of interest around guys like Bando, Watts or Sichterman. Is this because they're not at a level worthy of more recognition, or because they're not skill position players? Or, is it a combination of the two? Again, I feel like this is a pretty standard view among the casual follower of recruiting because we just don't hear a lot about some of the less flashy positions. Am I just a victim of water cooler conversation and media coverage here? Well I can tell you that Watts is going to be a huge piece of our puzzle (literally and figuratively. He has the potential to anchor our defensive front once he gets acclimated to college ball. Bando and Sichterman I would assume are going to redshirt. We have some really good linemen from last year who redshirted and should be ready to step in in some capacity. This years crop will reap the benefits of having time to develop. Also don't forget Jaimes who is arguably the best linemen of the bunch. Walker is a linemen who can play either side of the ball and seems to be more highly regarded by the day but again he will need time to develop and I believe he will get it. Don't forget we have another potential NT in Daniels who is thought to sign here come NSD who is almost as good as Watts. I wouldn't worry too much about the big fellas they have coming in. The defensive ones can play and might do so sooner rather than later. The offensive guys will need to develop, but we have the luxury of letting them do so with who we have in front of them. Quote Link to comment
Decked Posted January 30, 2017 Share Posted January 30, 2017 I would love some insight from those of you who follow recruiting more closely than me. As a casual recruiting observer, I feel right now like I have felt for years. It seems our highest touted recruits are skill position players. I understand this to be somewhat normal given their nature - everybody likes to hear and see the flashy quarterback, receiver and running back. They make the headlines. The super talented offensive lineman just doesn't bring the same fervor. But, is this standard or are we faltering in some of those key areas like the DL or the OL? Avery Roberts is one of the single most important players in the class in my opinion, but outside of him, there doesn't seem to be a lot of interest around guys like Bando, Watts or Sichterman. Is this because they're not at a level worthy of more recognition, or because they're not skill position players? Or, is it a combination of the two? Again, I feel like this is a pretty standard view among the casual follower of recruiting because we just don't hear a lot about some of the less flashy positions. Am I just a victim of water cooler conversation and media coverage here? Watts and Sichterman are severely underated, especially Watts. Bando seems like kind of another average recruit to me and his film wasn't extremely impressive and his ratings reflected that. Quote Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted January 30, 2017 Share Posted January 30, 2017 I would love some insight from those of you who follow recruiting more closely than me. As a casual recruiting observer, I feel right now like I have felt for years. It seems our highest touted recruits are skill position players. I understand this to be somewhat normal given their nature - everybody likes to hear and see the flashy quarterback, receiver and running back. They make the headlines. The super talented offensive lineman just doesn't bring the same fervor. But, is this standard or are we faltering in some of those key areas like the DL or the OL? Avery Roberts is one of the single most important players in the class in my opinion, but outside of him, there doesn't seem to be a lot of interest around guys like Bando, Watts or Sichterman. Is this because they're not at a level worthy of more recognition, or because they're not skill position players? Or, is it a combination of the two? Again, I feel like this is a pretty standard view among the casual follower of recruiting because we just don't hear a lot about some of the less flashy positions. Am I just a victim of water cooler conversation and media coverage here? That is the case with this class. However, I believe our O line recruiting has been really good the last couple years. Those players have been either playing as a Freshman/sophomore or redshirted. We should start seeing those players have an impact this year and next. As far as star ratings, this O line class isn't quite at the level of the two previous years. However, I do think there is potential in this class to have some good contributors. As for D line, If we keep the ones we have and add Daniels, I think we have a pretty dang good class with the transition to a 3-4. My hope is that we continue to get the really good skill position players and the recruits from the last couple classes start improving our O line to the point where higher level O linemen start looking at us even more. Quote Link to comment
spurs1990 Posted January 30, 2017 Share Posted January 30, 2017 I would love some insight from those of you who follow recruiting more closely than me. As a casual recruiting observer, I feel right now like I have felt for years. It seems our highest touted recruits are skill position players. I understand this to be somewhat normal given their nature - everybody likes to hear and see the flashy quarterback, receiver and running back. They make the headlines. The super talented offensive lineman just doesn't bring the same fervor. But, is this standard or are we faltering in some of those key areas like the DL or the OL? Avery Roberts is one of the single most important players in the class in my opinion, but outside of him, there doesn't seem to be a lot of interest around guys like Bando, Watts or Sichterman. Is this because they're not at a level worthy of more recognition, or because they're not skill position players? Or, is it a combination of the two? Again, I feel like this is a pretty standard view among the casual follower of recruiting because we just don't hear a lot about some of the less flashy positions. Am I just a victim of water cooler conversation and media coverage here? Watts and Sichterman are severely underated, especially Watts. Bando seems like kind of another average recruit to me and his film wasn't extremely impressive and his ratings reflected that. Luckily we don't need Bando to contribute right away and will have a year to learn as a redshirt. I completely agree about Watts. He's going to be a stud. Sichterman is one I don't know much about but he certainly has the frame. What sets him apart from the others in your mind? Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.