Jump to content


Nebraska's Nate Gerry Penalty Proves It's Time to Tackle the Lawlessness of Targeting Calls


eightlaces

Recommended Posts


 

While I don't agree with Gerry getting ejected for his hit, I think your article misses some key points.

First, Gerry wasn't ejected for hitting with the crown of the helmet. There are two different rules for targeting: Targeting and Making Forcible Contact With the Crown of the Helmet (Rule 9-1-3) and Targeting and Making Forcible Contact to Head or Neck Area of a Defenseless Player (Rule 9-1-4). Gerry was ejected for the second rule and while I dont agree with him being ejected for the hit, he certainly made helmet to helmet contact with the receiver in both videos.

Second, as a football official, I don't think that negative press is scaring referees into doing their jobs properly. I think most referees are doing the best they can with the rule book that they have been given. To say that we need to scrap the targeting rule because it is being applied too strictly in the name of player safety is ridiculous. If the NCAA wants to work for the safety of the players they wont eliminate the rule all together, but continue making incremental changes until its being applied more appropriately and consistently. Howeva.

Many of the calls that officials make are subjective. Holding, pass interference, and targeting all require officials to make split second decisions on whether or not to throw the flag and sometimes mistakes are made but the official should always err on the side of player safety. Everybody should care more about player safety, instead of poo-pooing torn ligaments, broken clavicles and players carted off the field on stretchers. Peoples lives can be ruined from concussions and the issue shouldnt be taken lightly.

I'll never understand someone like you. They got the call wrong. The rule as it stands is complete bull****. Player safety is important and you should know that there will always be injuries with a contact sport. You can not legislate injuries out of the game. Please understand that. A player should be ejected and penalized for malicious intent. Not for making a football play. If you cannot understand that, please take your latte and leave.
  • Fire 1
Link to comment

At the very minimum it needs to be changed so that it isn't a penalty if the offensive player lowers his body and that's why there was contact to the head or neck.

I'd have no problem if that's how they interepreted the rule now. If a player can lower his body to brace for impact, is he really "defenseless"?

Link to comment

Call on bosa was soft but it was 100% correct. Hits like that need to be removed

I'm surprised they called it because watching it live I completely missed the hit. Upon review, I understood why he was ejected.

 

The crazy thing is he put himself in much more danger on that hit than he did the opponent, imho. That kind of tackling is how you break your neck.

Link to comment

There is a study now that shows we should be doing tackling drills without helmets. A physician also has publicly stated that noone under 18 should play football. Replay cant make up for poor officiating, and ambiguous rules are killing the game.

 

Fellas, get real cozy with premier league soccer, because in our litigious, safety first new nation, you will not have football for long

Link to comment

The thing that makes the Nate Gerry call so stupid is the fact that the player in question was named defenseless, yet he has time to receive the ball, take 2 steps upfield, and brace himself for impact. That's not targeting a defenseless player.

 

https://vine.co/v/iAEgvEjtdVM

 

You want to talk about refs making a split second decision but ignore the fact that gerry had less than a split second to react to the receiver. Maybe he should have considered not turning up field...

Link to comment

There is a study now that shows we should be doing tackling drills without helmets. A physician also has publicly stated that noone under 18 should play football. Replay cant make up for poor officiating, and ambiguous rules are killing the game.

 

Fellas, get real cozy with premier league soccer, because in our litigious, safety first new nation, you will not have football for long

Well.

 

If I were to even make a recommendation on such a thing,I would say just the opposite.

 

If we are going to put an age limit on it, it's smarter to me to say no one OVER 18 should play.

 

Seriously, how many guys do you know that have bad health issues after just playing high school football.

 

It seems to me, most damage comes after high school when players become so big and fast.

 

 

.....and.....no I'm not promoting this. I just think this age idea is backwards.

Link to comment

 

Asu player just had a hit that was the same as bosa's. Wasn't called targeting...

I actually saw that and was shocked there wasn't a flag.
same here. The hit was with the head down, and hit the qb's chest with the crown, but it was also a little bit harder of a hit as well so it didnt make sense why they wouldnt throw the flag if thats the rule now.
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...