DOJ Initial Russia Hearings

[Landlord]

6 hours ago, MNBigRedNorth said:

Just what I expected!  You didn't get it.  In general when people are so resolved that they are right, they never see how wrong they are, because they don't allow the fact that they might be wrong to enter their mind!

 

 

Who are you talking about me? Dude I can't even tell you how routinely I'm wrong about so much. I now believe the opposite of a lot of things I used to even five years ago. That's why I cross reference news stories for reliability and ask/follow a lot of people way smarter than me from all different walks of life.

[commando]

3 minutes ago, MNBigRedNorth said:

 

Your talk now means absolutely nothing.  Can you guys what until Barr releases the report.  And remember he is not going to break the law and release what he legally can't.  Can't wait for President Trump to declassify the whole FISA load of crap too! Don't you want to know who and why someone was spying on President Trumps campaign team?

ken starr investigated clinton for far longer than meuller investigated trump...he had a lot of stuff in there the he had to get permission to release....and his full unredacted report was out in 2 days.   

[TGHusker]

Trump doing his best Sgt Shultz impersonation. 

 

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/wikileaks-assange-arrested-trump/2019/04/11/id/911306/

Quote

 

President Donald Trump declared Thursday that "I know nothing about WikiLeaks" after its disheveled founder Julian Assange was hauled out of the Ecuadorian Embassy in London to face charges.

His reaction was in stark contrast to how, as a candidate, Trump showered praise on Assange's hacking organization night after night during the final weeks of the 2016 presidential campaign.

Asked about Thursday's arrest, Trump said at the White House, "It's not my thing. I know there is something having to do with Julian Assange. I've been seeing what's happened with Assange and that will be a determination, I would imagine, mostly by the attorney general, who's doing an excellent job. So, he'll be making a determination . I know nothing really about him."

"It's not my deal in life."

 

Quote

 

But WikiLeaks was Trump's deal in 2016 as he welcomed the political boost his campaign got and cheered on the release of Clinton campaign emails.

On the same October day that the "Access Hollywood" tape emerged, revealing that Trump had bragged in 2005 about groping women, WikiLeaks began releasing damaging emails from Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, John Podesta. Trump and his allies, facing a tough battle in the campaign's final month, seized on the illegal dumps and weaponized them.

"WikiLeaks, I love WikiLeaks," Trump said in Pennsylvania.

"This WikiLeaks is like a treasure trove," Trump said in Michigan.

"Boy, I love reading WikiLeaks," Trump said in Ohio.

All told, Trump extolled WikiLeaks more than 100 times, and a poster of Assange hung backstage at the Republican's debate war room. At no point from a rally stage did Trump express any misgivings about how WikiLeaks obtained the emails from the Clinton campaign or about the accusations of stealing sensitive U.S. government information, which led to the charges against Assange on Thursday.

Assange for years has been under U.S. Justice Department scrutiny for WikiLeaks' role in publishing thousands of government secrets. He was an important figure in special counsel Robert Mueller's Russia probe, as investigators examined how WikiLeaks obtained emails that were stolen from Democratic groups.

 

 

 

[MNBigRedNorth]

8 minutes ago, commando said:

trumps executive orders covers canada and mexico?   and as far as i know he hasn't issued an executitve order on this...but if he has we are the only country operating under the "new' nafta rather than the old nafta.   

Sorry, my bad.  It is not in effect yet.  All 3 countries have to ratify.  But the will be.  This is an Opinion piece from Fox.  Sure an opinion, but one I can support.  Trump said he would get Mexico to pay for the wall, but he didn't say they would pay first.  That would mean waiting 3-4 years and allowing 2-3 Million more people to cross the boarder illegally.  I fully support the wall going up now and getting paid later.  https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/mexico-will-pay-for-a-wall-trump-is-right

[funhusker]

33 minutes ago, MNBigRedNorth said:

I sure do and Mexico is paying for it with the favorable new North American Trade Agreement which benefiting us all and creating much more tax revenue and jobs with business returning to our country.  Oh and by the way I also remember the term "You can Keep Your Doctor and Your Healthcare Plan". How'd that work out for the American people.

It's not even in effect yet...

 

And even if it were, that's not how it works.

[MNBigRedNorth]

4 minutes ago, TGHusker said:

Trump doing his best Sgt Shultz impersonation. 

 

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/wikileaks-assange-arrested-trump/2019/04/11/id/911306/

 

 

Well wouldn't you?  If you were in his shoes and the wiki leaks things was happening to your benefit, wouldn't you go along for a ride to your benefit.  My gosh I'm amazed with the fishing expedition that are happening.  Just shows the left is seriously getting nervous and much more will be coming out.  I'm looking for some false flag stuff to happen so the press doesn't have to report on what Barr will be doing and what he finds. 

[MNBigRedNorth]

1 minute ago, funhusker said:

It's not even in effect yet...

 

And even if it were, that's not how it works.

If you take a look and the post just before your last one, I corrected myself!

[Guy Chamberlin]

23 minutes ago, MNBigRedNorth said:

Oh and by the way I also remember the term "You can Keep Your Doctor and Your Healthcare Plan". How'd that work out for the American people.

 

Pretty well, thanks.

 

It turns out less than 1% of Americans fell into a gray area where they were dropped by existing health plans that did not want to include the ACA option, or did not comply with ACA standards (i.e. they were pretty crappy plans to begin with).  The other 99% of Americans were allowed to do whatever they were doing before Obamacare came along. 30 million Americans were able to get previously unavailable health insurance, especially those with pre-existing conditions. Those who refused health insurance faced a small penalty, not unlike drivers who refuse to carry automobile insurance -- a practice never accused of socialism.

 

Of course it would have all worked better with a stronger buy-in and less sabotage from people screeching blatant untruths like yourself. But I've given up on you having even a moment of doubt and reflection. 

[funhusker]

Just now, MNBigRedNorth said:

If you take a look and the post just before your last one, I corrected myself!

Wow.  You're learning again.  Good to see some sense getting through.

 

However, if the money for the wall comes out of US coffers (no matter how it got there), Mexico isn't paying, we are.  If Mexico paid we would have all of the extra money to use on things like roads, bridges, and education.

[Guy Chamberlin]

5 minutes ago, MNBigRedNorth said:

Well wouldn't you?  If you were in his shoes and the wiki leaks things was happening to your benefit, wouldn't you go along for a ride to your benefit.  My gosh I'm amazed with the fishing expedition that are happening.  Just shows the left is seriously getting nervous and much more will be coming out.  I'm looking for some false flag stuff to happen so the press doesn't have to report on what Barr will be doing and what he finds. 

 

You were just shown an example of Donald Trump lying. Your response is "well wouldn't you?"

 

It's really hard to put a stake in your moral high ground, Minny.

[Landlord]

2 minutes ago, MNBigRedNorth said:

Trump said he would get Mexico to pay for the wall, but he didn't say they would pay first.

 

This is the most hilarious and pathetic contortion to make Trump out to be anything other than a s#!tty snake oil salesman. 

 

Trump also said that Mexico would pay for it by check. But I'm sure he just was being REALLY SNEAKY and meant something we couldn't understand like a symbolic check in 15 years time.

[knapplc]

 

[BigRedBuster]

1 hour ago, MNBigRedNorth said:

 

Your talk now means absolutely nothing.  Can you guys what until Barr releases the report.  And remember he is not going to break the law and release what he legally can't.  Can't wait for President Trump to declassify the whole FISA load of crap too! Don't you want to know who and why someone was spying on President Trumps campaign team?

Wait....what??????

 

Aren’t you are the one that constantly in this thread has proclaimed that the report totally exonerates the president without seeing the report solely based on the 4 page letter?

 

one of these two men are lying. The President or the AG...or both. They both can’t be right. 

[commando]

17 minutes ago, knapplc said:

 

wikileaks....a bunch of coffee boys...nothing more

[MNBigRedNorth]

9 minutes ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

 

You were just shown an example of Donald Trump lying. Your response is "well wouldn't you?"

 

It's really hard to put a stake in your moral high ground, Minny.

You call it a lie?  Come on, when people are on the campaign trail lot of things are said, just like the crap Obama said.  But I guess you have to take your shot, because gosh dang it Trump is so evil and we need to have him gone.  We need some one that's going to fall in line and be just like all the other do nothing President's and are controlled by everyone but the American people!  I also get a kick out of people from Nebraska use the word Minny or Twinkie when talk to people from Minnesota.  Listen my roots are down there and my own brother does the same thing to me.  And hey, I really wish I could could talk face to face with many poster here.  Many times people talking over these board spout out more than they need too.  Posting boards posters can be quite gruesome on one another.  Hey after reading some of the stuff I saw for a few days a month or so ago, I couldn't believe what I was seeing.  But hey, it's only your opinion, I get it, but I felt a need to get involved in the conversation here to give you all a bit of the other side.  Sorry if I have ever offended anyone, you have your right to your view.  I only ask that people look at the other side of things.  President Trump didn't have to run for office.  He's a billionaire and could have just stayed doing what he was doing and made far more money than what  he's doing now.  Their is no reason that he would have had to collude with Russia.  In fact Russia would have been far better off without Trump in office.  Hillary and Bill loved Russia.  Bill spoke over there many times and Hillary made sure that the Uranium One deal went through.  On the other hand Trump has been an Iron fist toward them.  Sure he had a one on one with Putin.  I wish I would have been a mouse in the corner when that meeting occurred.  What was it about?  Only Trump and Putin know.  I know that bugs the heck out of the anti Trump mob, but I don't think it was too favorable for Putin, and at best they might have come to an agreement how to handle the mess in Syria!  Sure what I'm saying is just speculation, but this is  how most of Americans feel.  Sorry, but I think a lot of what is said here many times is pretty far fetched, and as you most likely think the same of what I say.  Oh well, these comments were sure all over the place and was not intend to be directed at anyone person or the board.