BigRedBuster Posted March 29, 2022 Share Posted March 29, 2022 4 hours ago, Archy1221 said: I can’t wait for this impeachment hearing Pretty stupid fir her to be saying these things at this point. Link to comment
Danny Bateman Posted March 31, 2022 Share Posted March 31, 2022 7 hours ago, DevoHusker said: If there's one person who knows all about campaign finance violations, it's noted felon Dinesh D'Souza. 1 3 Link to comment
DevoHusker Posted March 31, 2022 Share Posted March 31, 2022 Always love the witty repartee over sources when it's a topic people don't like and can't refute. 1 1 Link to comment
JJ Husker Posted March 31, 2022 Share Posted March 31, 2022 17 hours ago, DevoHusker said: So the Clinton campaign treasurer gets fined $8,000 and the DNC treasurer gets fined $105,000 for paying for opp research and calling it legal services. Okay. Good. A slap on the wrist for some shenanigans. Now what are they going to do about the much larger, huge really, problem of what Trump did and is doing with stop the steal and actually troubling interference in our election process? One side misclassified some payments and got inconsequentially fined. The other side has done 100x worse things and….crickets. 4 1 Link to comment
DevoHusker Posted March 31, 2022 Share Posted March 31, 2022 25 minutes ago, JJ Husker said: So the Clinton campaign treasurer gets fined $8,000 and the DNC treasurer gets fined $105,000 for paying for opp research and calling it legal services. Okay. Good. A slap on the wrist for some shenanigans. Now what are they going to do about the much larger, huge really, problem of what Trump did and is doing with stop the steal and actually troubling interference in our election process? One side misclassified some payments and got inconsequentially fined. The other side has done 100x worse things and….crickets. Trust me, if there is similar findings about the RNC or Trump I will post a link to that when it comes out as well. 1 Link to comment
NebraskaHarry Posted March 31, 2022 Share Posted March 31, 2022 18 hours ago, DevoHusker said: Good, they should get fined. Even though it's just pennies, really. Now how are they going to handle Trump and his activities? 2 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted March 31, 2022 Share Posted March 31, 2022 2 hours ago, DevoHusker said: Always love the witty repartee over sources when it's a topic people don't like and can't refute. Yep, especially when the information being conveyed is correct. 2 1 Link to comment
DevoHusker Posted March 31, 2022 Share Posted March 31, 2022 47 minutes ago, JJ Husker said: Now what are they going to do about the much larger, huge really, problem of what Trump did and is doing with stop the steal and actually troubling interference in our election process? 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted March 31, 2022 Share Posted March 31, 2022 45 minutes ago, JJ Husker said: So the Clinton campaign treasurer gets fined $8,000 and the DNC treasurer gets fined $105,000 for paying for opp research and calling it legal services. Okay. Good. A slap on the wrist for some shenanigans. Now what are they going to do about the much larger, huge really, problem of what Trump did and is doing with stop the steal and actually troubling interference in our election process? One side misclassified some payments and got inconsequentially fined. The other side has done 100x worse things and….crickets. I believe there is an entire Jan 6th commission investigating. So not really crickets. And Durham is investigating more than “misclassified payments”. 2 Link to comment
Born N Bled Red Posted March 31, 2022 Share Posted March 31, 2022 26 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: I believe there is an entire Jan 6th commission investigating. So not really crickets. And Durham is investigating more than “misclassified payments”. Jan. 6th Committee is not the FEC. 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted March 31, 2022 Share Posted March 31, 2022 12 minutes ago, Born N Bled Red said: Jan. 6th Committee is not the FEC. Yes that’s not really in dispute. What’s the point of the post besides letting us know what we already know? 2 Link to comment
Born N Bled Red Posted March 31, 2022 Share Posted March 31, 2022 53 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: Yes that’s not really in dispute. What’s the point of the post besides letting us know what we already know? Again, pretending to not understand the words you wrote???? Come'on man. Someone called out the FEC for crickets on Trumps Russian funding, backdoor communications with Russia, and all the other crap he pulled - pocketing money raised for charitable reasons, the wall, etc. - You're response was - there is the Jan 6th Committee. Clearly equating the FEC with the Jan 6th committee. They are not the same, and the FEC should definitely be investigating Trump in the same way. So your dismissal of the posters complaints about crickets on Trump from the FEC was not adequate or accurate, nor germane to the post you replied to. 3 Link to comment
Recommended Posts