The Angry Violent Right

[Guy Chamberlin]

I think any President would have taken a hit when COVID sent the economy reeling, but doesn't Donald Trump's messaging go well beyond "not helpful?"

 

Trump viewed the coronavirus exclusively through the lens of how it would hurt his reelection bid. Precisely as he sowed doubt on the integrity of this election, he undermined the messaging of medical experts. Hosting and televising his own super-spreader events throughout the pandemic was also beyond "not helpful." This man doesn't see 350,000 dead Americans; he sees weak people who cost him the election. He's a sociopath. The same sociopath who ran in 2016. 

 

I mean hey, I'm grateful enough Republicans in power are now willing to condemn the President and push back against their own QAnon wing. Didn't want to go that way alone. I was honestly heartened the see Mitch McConnell and Linsdey Graham drop the hammer on Trump in unambiguous terms. But wow....it's very late in the game, and Trump is the same sociopath they've always enabled. 

[Archy1221]

40 minutes ago, BlitzFirst said:

it must be tiring to keep up @Archy1221

 

I don't know how you keep it up.  I'd have stopped posting a long time ago because nothing anyone says here changes anything, does anything, nor proves anything.

No idea if you are referring to any specifically, but glad your back. 

[BigRedBuster]

1 minute ago, Archy1221 said:

No idea if you are referring to any specifically, but glad your back. 

I do appreciate your posting here.  But, you need to be careful.  You might end up being like most of us who are ex-Republicans (independents).  

[Archy1221]

42 minutes ago, Ulty said:

It was a discussion about Trump's values, or lack thereof (and the damage it has wrought), and you compared it to Obama's carbon footprint. You made that $h!t post and tried to deflect the conversation, not me.

 

If you were on a debate stage being asked about conservative values and you rambled about Obama's vacation home, you would look like a fool.

Good thing I didn’t take Debate class.  
 

Now onto the point you consistently missed, though not surprised.  I agreed with his assessment on Trump and then said it’s a problem with most politicians.  I have an example of someone on the left moralizing for votes yet not living by those morals on a top issue for Democrats. 
 

this isn’t really that hard.  

[Archy1221]

24 minutes ago, knapplc said:

 

He told us years ago this was coming. That's why these epiphanies in the last 24 hours are such bunk.

 

 

He said years ago that he will call for people to storm the capital?  

[Archy1221]

5 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

I do appreciate your posting here.  But, you need to be careful.  You might end up being like most of us who are ex-Republicans (independents).  

I thought about re-registering as an Independent years ago, but I mostly vote Republican anyways and wanted option to vote in primaries 

[BigRedBuster]

2 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

I thought about re-registering as an Independent years ago, but I mostly vote Republican anyways and wanted option to vote in primaries 

That's why I stayed that way for a while.  But, I couldn't handle being associated with a party anymore.  I've realized it didn't really matter about the primaries in middle Nebraska.

 

When you actually break away from the party, it allows you to actually think more independently.  I know it sounds strange.  But...

[Archy1221]

31 minutes ago, Nebfanatic said:

I dont support Musolinni , just everything he has done the past 3.5 years. Those trains were always on time. 

Good for you 

[Born N Bled Red]

1 hour ago, Archy1221 said:

Agree with the Trump sentiment but again the same can be said for many politicians Dems included. Obama doesn’t live his own climate position and that’s the number one issue with many Dems, gay marriage he was against for most of his time as a politician even though he talked about gay rights, etc...

 

majority of politicians morph into whatever it takes to get themselves elected regardless of their personnel beliefs.  If that statement triggers people here to, so be it.   

 

And I agree that no politician will check every box. Politicians that become president generally check the core values that define a party. Climate change is not a core value of the left. It is an important (while relatively new) issue, but not a core value. Core values of the left would include, compassion, inclusiveness, and a care for the greater good. 

 

With Trump - the Republican party sacrificed all of their core values. Let's talk about some of these. Immigration- Trump hires cheap foreign labor at every one of his properties over giving American's jobs- Industry/ Job Creation- Trump personally manufactures all of his products in foreign countries. - Respecting entrepreneurs and small business- Trump has screwed more contractors out of rightfully owed dollars than perhaps any living person. - Sanctity of Marriage - 3rd wife, paying off pornstars, etc. Pro-life- well I don't want to speculate if/how many abortions he's paid for. - God fearing- yeah, how bout no. - There is no core conservative value except maybe having achieved personal wealth, that was filled by Trump. 

 

So while I agree that all politicians have their faults, none have been as lacking as Trump was in filling the core values for a party as Trump. This is why many republicans have said "I didn't leave my party- the party left me."

[FrantzHardySwag]

37 minutes ago, knapplc said:

 

 

[Archy1221]

20 minutes ago, Guy Chamberlin said:

, he undermined the messaging of medical experts

Unfortunately, many of those medical experts on TV did of fine job of this on their own. 

[DevoHusker]

47 minutes ago, ZRod said:

It was known within hours that there were agitators at the BLM protests. Umbrella man was called out almost immediately in Minnesota. There were people shunning ANTIFA in Pittsburgh as they vandalized a cop car. Those are two off the top of the head.

Thanks!

[Archy1221]

6 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

That's why I stayed that way for a while.  But, I couldn't handle being associated with a party anymore.  I've realized it didn't really matter about the primaries in middle Nebraska.

 

When you actually break away from the party, it allows you to actually think more independently.  I know it sounds strange.  But...

But just think, if enough people like you stayed in the party maybe you could affect the primaries?  

[BigRedBuster]

3 minutes ago, Archy1221 said:

But just think, if enough people like you stayed in the party maybe you could affect the primaries?  

I'm in central Nebraska.  No vote in a Nebraska primary matters because it's all decided before it ever gets to us.  It's just one of the most pathetic problems with our election process.  People in Nebraska have absolutely no say in who is the candidate.

[Archy1221]

Just now, BigRedBuster said:

I'm in central Nebraska.  No vote in a Nebraska primary matters because it's all decided before it ever gets to us.  It's just one of the most pathetic problems with our election process.  People in Nebraska have absolutely no say in who is the candidate.

This is a legitimate thought/question along those lines.  
 

How many hundreds of thousands or possibly into the millions of Republican leaning voters in CA or maybe some major metro areas don’t vote because of precisely the same thoughts.  That there isn’t enough of them to make a difference so they don’t vote.