Pedro G Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 If we get two out of those first three — Mao highly likely — that would be a great success. So far with Frost, verses Osborne, Scott seems to finish stronger, where as Dr Tom seemed to come up a little short at the end, even with some of his better classes. But it’s possible we go one and three this time around, but I feel like two out of three, with the possibly we get all of them. Stay tune. Quote Link to comment
Pedro G Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 11 minutes ago, Pedro G said: If we get two out of those first three — Mao highly likely — that would be a great success. So far with Frost, verses Osborne, Scott seems to finish stronger, where as Dr Tom seemed to come up a little short at the end, even with some of his better classes. But it’s possible we go one and three this time around, but I feel like two out of three, with the possibly we get all of them. Stay tune. Whoever is confused with my reply, I get that. Sorry. I am just pointing out there are no guarantees which way it will go — there are four ways this could go. I just feel like two out of three is the most likely — my opinion of course. Heck, Mao might surprise everyone and go to USC, and we go zero out of three. But Mao seems likely N and we get one of the other two. Yes, of course I want all three. Quote Link to comment
Hedley Lamarr Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 7 minutes ago, Pedro G said: Whoever is confused with my reply, I get that. Sorry. I am just pointing out there are no guarantees which way it will go — there are four ways this could go. I just feel like two out of three is the most likely — my opinion of course. Heck, Mao might surprise everyone and go to USC, and we go zero out of three. But Mao seems likely N and we get one of the other two. Yes, of course I want all three. You followed recruiting in the 70s,80s and 90s? 1 Quote Link to comment
BIG ERN Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 1 hour ago, The Murphinator said: My guess is the order is: 1. Parker 2. Njoku 3. Pola Moa 4. Starks 5. Houston 6. Fonua 7. Mayo 8. Bivens I still think Jordan is a priority. Runs like a gazelle for his size 3 Quote Link to comment
Pedro G Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 1 hour ago, Hedley Lamarr said: You followed recruiting in the 70s,80s and 90s? Yes I did follow recruiting those years. If you disagree with me, fine. Go ahead and state the facts I am missing if you think I am wrong. I remember, especially in the ‘80s and the ‘90s, missing on some of those big recruits that went down to the wire and when it was between us and one other college — near misses. But Dr Tom still has some excellent classes regardless. In the ‘70s, I do remember the talent level with Osborne’s teams wasn’t quite as good, as that especially showed against Oklahoma. We started recruiting better in the ‘80s, and we won five out of 10 against OU. And then Dr Tom turned it up a notch on recruiting in the 90s, which produced Osborne’s most dominant teams on both sides of the ball. 1 Quote Link to comment
HS_Coach_C Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 3 hours ago, The Murphinator said: My guess is the order is: 1a. Parker 1b. Jordan 1c. Fonua 2a. Njoku 2b. Houston 3. Pola Mao 4. Starks 5. Bivens I'd put it like this If Starks doesn't want in, I wonder if they'd try to take both Parker and Jordan (with Njoku and Pola Mao) to help the OLB room. I doubt it, but you never know. Probably more likely that they'd let Bivens commit. 1 Quote Link to comment
The Murphinator Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 4 minutes ago, HS_Coach_C said: I'd put it like this If Starks doesn't want in, I wonder if they'd try to take both Parker and Jordan (with Njoku and Pola Mao) to help the OLB room. I doubt it, but you never know. Probably more likely that they'd let Bivens commit. Yeah. That is pretty much what I had. I just forgot about Jordan. Quote Link to comment
Pedro G Posted January 21, 2019 Share Posted January 21, 2019 It would be a nice problem if more prospects want to commit than they have spots that are available. Then the coaches can pick and chose. Of course you run the risk of one signing with another school, but that is how recruiting happens sometimes. Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 I would put Pola Mao at #1 on the list if these lists are who we will give a scholarship to and not just who we’d prefer. If we made a promise to Pola-Gates, I don’t think we’re gonna break it. I think if Pola Mao wants N he’s N. Quote Link to comment
BIG ERN Posted January 22, 2019 Share Posted January 22, 2019 5 minutes ago, Moiraine said: I would put Pola Mao at #1 on the list if these lists are who we will give a scholarship to and not just who we’d prefer. If we made a promise to Pola-Gates, I don’t think we’re gonna break it. I think if Pola Mao wants N he’s N. Pola Mao > Soni Fonua Quote Link to comment
ArkanSkers Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 Oklahoma State CB.........from an Oklahoma St guy FWIW 2 Quote Link to comment
Ziebol Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 Just now, ArkanSkers said: Oklahoma State CB.........from an Oklahoma St guy FWIW He's a ways down the list so this shouldn't surprise anyone. Quote Link to comment
spurs1990 Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 Like almost not even on the list Quote Link to comment
ArkanSkers Posted January 24, 2019 Share Posted January 24, 2019 Hey, guys. I’m just reporting the news. Don’t shoot the messenger! I’d rather get Pola-Mao anyways. 2 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.