Dr. Strangelove Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 I don't like him because I've seen him play... That's strange. The few times he's been on the field he's been reasonably productive considering the circumstances. Unless you've seen him play in situations other than what we've all seen, I'm curious to how you've come to this conclusion? Quote Link to comment
Warrior10 Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 I don't like him because I've seen him play... That's strange. The few times he's been on the field he's been reasonably productive considering the circumstances. Unless you've seen him play in situations other than what we've all seen, I'm curious to how you've come to this conclusion?I disagree with you for the record. But this isn't the place to discuss it. Quote Link to comment
Warrior10 Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 Mike Schaefer @mikejschaefer 4m4 minutes ago Change of plans for one official visitor that was expected in Lincoln this weekend. More here (VIP): http://nebraska.247sports.com/Bolt/Change-of-plans-for-visitor-35188136 I would guess one of the JUCO DE's? Or Alston maybe? Maurice Daniels said he didn't have the grades to get an offer so he isn't comingMakes sense. Thanks Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 Jeff Mason @JW_Mason 1h1 hour ago #Huskers 2015 Class by State: Arizona 1 California 1 Georgia 1 Kansas 1 Louisiana 2 Oklahoma 1 Colorado 2 Missouri 2 Nebraska 2 Texas 2 Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 Three spots left but spread among five positions. Curious to see what happens. We are almost assuredly taking a LB and will take a LS if Ober says yes. Not sure who the staff would take after that.LB - One more. Not sure if we prefer Hall or Garbutt (both visiting this weekend) but Talan seems to be behind them.DE - Taking one. No idea what our order is. Davis visiting this weekend.WR - Alston (visiting) if he wants NOL - Paulo (visiting) if he wants NLS - Ober (visiting) or we'll have to scramble pretty fast.------------------------------------QB - 0RB - 1 - OzigboWR - 2 - Morgan (Alston)TE - 1 - SnyderOT - 1-2 - Gaylord (Paulo)OG/C - 2 - Decker, BarnettDT - 2 - C. Davis, K. DavisDE - 2 - Neal, (Bailey, Roberts, Davis)LB - 4 - Young, Ferguson, Barry (Talan, Hall, Garbutt)CB - 2 - Lee, AndersonS - 2 - Williams, SykesLS - 1 - (Ober) Quote Link to comment
zoogs Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 » Social media engagement. You may have noticed that, thus far, Nebraska’s assistant coaches don’t tweet too much. Or you may not have noticed it because the Huskers have so successfully leveraged and empowered their support staff to do the tweeting for the staff. http://www.omaha.com/huskers/mckewon-nebraska-staff-s-done-well-ahead-of-last-dash/article_242f5eca-0d70-59b0-8e49-d5f8cb8cc136.html Quote Link to comment
Huskinator Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 what happens if all 8 end up committing mavric? are we in trouble or what do they end up doing? I realize all 8 actually commiting is slim to none but lets just play hypothetical for one minute Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 That's the thing - I really don't think we can take all of them. Seems like we can only take three which I think will for sure be a LB, the LS will get a spot if he wants it but I'm not sure what we'd do after that. The only odd think is I've seen a couple rumblings about who was included in the 19 that Gunderson said we'd take. The question is whether the four early enrollees were included in that number. I think they would have been but for some reason a couple people are questioning that. The only way that would be possible is if there are already more guys who have left. That wouldn't seem to make any sense and there haven't been any names mentioned but I guess it's possible. Quote Link to comment
Minnesota_husker Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 Paulo and Hall would be ideal at this point... I would be tickled if we could add those two. Quote Link to comment
Hedley Lamarr Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 That's the thing - I really don't think we can take all of them. Seems like we can only take three which I think will for sure be a LB, the LS will get a spot if he wants it but I'm not sure what we'd do after that. The only odd think is I've seen a couple rumblings about who was included in the 19 that Gunderson said we'd take. The question is whether the four early enrollees were included in that number. I think they would have been but for some reason a couple people are questioning that. The only way that would be possible is if there are already more guys who have left. That wouldn't seem to make any sense and there haven't been any names mentioned but I guess it's possible. Early enrollees go towards last years number don't They? Quote Link to comment
Huskinator Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 The staff clearly wants a LS but ideal for me would be Alston, Paulo, Hall, Talan, Bailey maybe snyder is leaving???? Quote Link to comment
StPaulHusker Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 So here is a question. Why are we offering a QB a preferred walk on spot but offering a LS a scholarship? Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 That's the thing - I really don't think we can take all of them. Seems like we can only take three which I think will for sure be a LB, the LS will get a spot if he wants it but I'm not sure what we'd do after that. The only odd think is I've seen a couple rumblings about who was included in the 19 that Gunderson said we'd take. The question is whether the four early enrollees were included in that number. I think they would have been but for some reason a couple people are questioning that. The only way that would be possible is if there are already more guys who have left. That wouldn't seem to make any sense and there haven't been any names mentioned but I guess it's possible. Early enrollees go towards last years number don't They? They can but it doesn't matter at this point. The only number is 85 - or 88 with the three over-signings. Quote Link to comment
Amac3309 Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 That's the thing - I really don't think we can take all of them. Seems like we can only take three which I think will for sure be a LB, the LS will get a spot if he wants it but I'm not sure what we'd do after that. The only odd think is I've seen a couple rumblings about who was included in the 19 that Gunderson said we'd take. The question is whether the four early enrollees were included in that number. I think they would have been but for some reason a couple people are questioning that. The only way that would be possible is if there are already more guys who have left. That wouldn't seem to make any sense and there haven't been any names mentioned but I guess it's possible. Early enrollees go towards last years number don't They? They can but it doesn't matter at this point. The only number is 85 - or 88 with the three over-signings. Bottom line we are at 84 with the current commits we can take 4 more or 3 if we get Lewis to transfer, if they take more than that someone is leaving the program that we dont know about. Or they pretty much know someone won't qualify Quote Link to comment
ScottyIce Posted January 30, 2015 Share Posted January 30, 2015 Clouse said our class will be 21 or 22. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.