Recruiting Concerns

[huskerhill]

"@Sean_Callahan: With Slade's commit Nebraska's 2014 recruiting class is up to No. 26 in the http://t.co/lvK0ptotru team rankings - http://t.co/jk5z4fMDnk"

[HuskerShark]

So hypothetically speaking, say we pick up Keys, McDaniel, and Ballage, about where would we be sitting for recruiting ranking?

 

Second question: How many will we be taking in this class?

[dylan]

I expect we'll take a full class if we can get the guys we want.

[MLB 51]

So hypothetically speaking, say we pick up Keys, McDaniel, and Ballage, about where would we be sitting for recruiting ranking?

 

Second question: How many will we be taking in this class?

I was thinking we would take about 21 or 22.

[ObamaRocks91]

So hypothetically speaking, say we pick up Keys, McDaniel, and Ballage, about where would we be sitting for recruiting ranking?

 

Second question: How many will we be taking in this class?

 

According to the 247 commit calculator, we would move up to 27th with the 3 recruits you mentioned. You can add and subtract any player you like and it shows you the class rating.

 

http://nebraska.247s...Commits/Preview

 

 

We will be taking anywhere from 23-26.

[huskers89]

So hypothetically speaking, say we pick up Keys, McDaniel, and Ballage, about where would we be sitting for recruiting ranking?

 

Second question: How many will we be taking in this class?

 

I've seen anywhere between 22-26

 

I hope they finish with:

DB McDaniel

DB Keys

OL Gates

RB Powell or Ballage

WR Johnson or Brown (Just a gut feeling Brown is still possible)

 

That would be 24 if no current commits leave

[MLB 51]

So hypothetically speaking, say we pick up Keys, McDaniel, and Ballage, about where would we be sitting for recruiting ranking?

 

Second question: How many will we be taking in this class?

I was thinking we would take about 21 or 22.

da skers says 25 is the target number.

[tmfr15]

Looks like a pretty solid class to me. Let's GOOOOOO!

[Mavric]

If we get into the top 20 that'll be back to back top 20's for the first time in a long time.

Since last year?

[huskerhill]

If we get into the top 20 that'll be back to back top 20's for the first time in a long time.

Since last year?

 

 

That's what back to back means.

 

In 2012 we were 25th.

 

I think what he's saying is the past two classes have been top 25 according to rivals...

[Mavric]

If we get into the top 20 that'll be back to back top 20's for the first time in a long time.

Since last year?

That's what back to back means.

 

In 2012 we were 25th.

My bad. Sometimes I get to reading to fast and skip over words. Last time we were Top 20 back to back on Rivals was 06-07.

[caveman99]

If we get into the top 20 that'll be back to back top 20's for the first time in a long time.

Since last year?

That's what back to back means.

 

In 2012 we were 25th.

My bad. Sometimes I get to reading to fast and skip over words. Last time we were Top 20 back to back on Rivals was 06-07.

Would also make 3 out of the last 4 classes inside the top 20.

[huskerhill]

If we get into the top 20 that'll be back to back top 20's for the first time in a long time.

Since last year?

That's what back to back means.

 

In 2012 we were 25th.

My bad. Sometimes I get to reading to fast and skip over words. Last time we were Top 20 back to back on Rivals was 06-07.

 

I don't know how to read either. Thought we were talkin top 25 as well. My bad Dev

[presidentjlh]

Class rankings don't matter here, what matters is how the players fit with the program, and right now, I feel excellent with the guys we have picked up these past few weeks.

[Thanks_Tom RR]

We still need 1 or 2 OT for this class.