alexhortdog95 Posted December 31, 2014 Author Share Posted December 31, 2014 QB drives the train here. You can get many a recruit here based off who is handing the snap from center. Quote Link to comment
Moiraine Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 I also really liked Zac Lee and think 2010 could have been different with him at the helm. ie we win the conference.... Someone took some crazy pills. Quote Link to comment
In the Deed the Glory Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 Joe Ganz was every bit the quarterback that Zac was, and ran essentially the same system. This is a good post though. Refreshing perspective. I am going to respectfully disagree here. Why? You realize among active quarterbacks his senior season he had the 3rd best career passer rating behind Sam Bradford and Tim Tebow? Better passer rating, better completion percentage, more yardage, better runner. Not saying that's proof of anything but I don't know how you take one over the other. Zac Taylor has a much higher football IQ and made the correct play more often than Ganz. Joe would force a lot of passes and threw a ton of picks, many of which were under zero pressure. Zac had a much worse supporting cast, and honestly probably won us 4-5 games a season just on his ability to stand in the pocket and deliver the ball for first downs knowing he was going to get creamed. I liked Joe Ganz. I am also going to get murdered for this, but he is probably the most overrated QB in Nebraska Football history. IMHO 1 Quote Link to comment
SLHusker Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 Joe Ganz was every bit the quarterback that Zac was, and ran essentially the same system. This is a good post though. Refreshing perspective. I am going to respectfully disagree here. Why? You realize among active quarterbacks his senior season he had the 3rd best career passer rating behind Sam Bradford and Tim Tebow? Better passer rating, better completion percentage, more yardage, better runner. Not saying that's proof of anything but I don't know how you take one over the other. Zac Taylor has a much higher football IQ and made the correct play more often than Ganz. Joe would force a lot of passes and threw a ton of picks, many of which were under zero pressure. Zac had a much worse supporting cast, and honestly probably won us 4-5 games a season just on his ability to stand in the pocket and deliver the ball for first downs knowing he was going to get creamed. I liked Joe Ganz. I am also going to get murdered for this, but he is probably the most overrated QB in Nebraska Football history. IMHO He just did not give a wow factor. Quote Link to comment
alexhortdog95 Posted December 31, 2014 Author Share Posted December 31, 2014 Joe Ganz was every bit the quarterback that Zac was, and ran essentially the same system. This is a good post though. Refreshing perspective. I am going to respectfully disagree here. Why? You realize among active quarterbacks his senior season he had the 3rd best career passer rating behind Sam Bradford and Tim Tebow? Better passer rating, better completion percentage, more yardage, better runner. Not saying that's proof of anything but I don't know how you take one over the other. Zac Taylor has a much higher football IQ and made the correct play more often than Ganz. Joe would force a lot of passes and threw a ton of picks, many of which were under zero pressure. Zac had a much worse supporting cast, and honestly probably won us 4-5 games a season just on his ability to stand in the pocket and deliver the ball for first downs knowing he was going to get creamed. I liked Joe Ganz. I am also going to get murdered for this, but he is probably the most overrated QB in Nebraska Football history. IMHO I think folks loved Ganz more because he WASN'T Sam Keller. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 Joe Ganz was every bit the quarterback that Zac was, and ran essentially the same system. This is a good post though. Refreshing perspective. I am going to respectfully disagree here. Why? You realize among active quarterbacks his senior season he had the 3rd best career passer rating behind Sam Bradford and Tim Tebow? Better passer rating, better completion percentage, more yardage, better runner. Not saying that's proof of anything but I don't know how you take one over the other. MNC in 2009 with Joe at the helm. No doubt in my mind. Man what could've been...... Would have loved to see that match-up with Alabama. But we would easily have won all the games we actually did play. EASILY. Quote Link to comment
NUpolo8 Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 I also really liked Zac Lee and think 2010 could have been different with him at the helm. ie we win the conference.... Someone took some crazy pills. If he wasn't massively hurt it's an interesting question......Taylor too for that matter. Quote Link to comment
dvdcrr Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 Joe Gantz should have always started over Keller. Zac Taylor was tougher than a muskrat. And he came up here from Oklahoma which makes me like him more. He had to really put everything he had into those 25 yd outs and he got it done, more often than not after peeling himself out of the turf the play before. To me it seemed like the coaches bailed on Z Lee. He had some great intangibles. 1 Quote Link to comment
husker07 Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 I love this OP. Sums up my feelings exactly on the new era of offense. It terribly stunts the growth of the most important player on the team, the qb. Yes, it can make it easier for guys to succeed, but long term you'd be better off letting a guy learn and develop the mental side of the game. 1 Quote Link to comment
Landlord Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 Zac Taylor has a much higher football IQ and made the correct play more often than Ganz. Joe would force a lot of passes and threw a ton of picks, many of which were under zero pressure. Zac had 8 picks to Joe's 11 in 2008? Not exactly a ton. Unless you think it's fair to compare Joe Ganz's 2007 games where Callahan went air raid to try and save his job. But I don't think it is. Quote Link to comment
In the Deed the Glory Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 Zac Taylor has a much higher football IQ and made the correct play more often than Ganz. Joe would force a lot of passes and threw a ton of picks, many of which were under zero pressure. Zac had 8 picks to Joe's 11 in 2008? Not exactly a ton. Unless you think it's fair to compare Joe Ganz's 2007 games where Callahan went air raid to try and save his job. But I don't think it is. ...and this is an example of where stats don't tell the whole truth. Zac Taylor's INT's were nearly 100% due to unbelievable defensive pressure and tipped passes. Seriously, watch those on film from 2006. I think he had one bad decision that wound up a pick that entire year. Watch the OU game, he is getting his ass kicked on every play. We couldn't block a middle school team's d line that year. Ganz was good for a terrible decision nearly every game. Weren't something like 5 or 6 of those 11 INT's pick 6's? However, I digress. I am not so sure we are going to see us slinging the ball all over the field with this team. At least not right away. I think we will be running the ball a lot here in the near future. It just won't be this gimmicky ass shotgun spread. (I hope) 2 Quote Link to comment
admo Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 They both were good in their own right. IIRC Zac checked down a lot, even if it was just a two yard gain on 3rd and 6. But he was accurate down field for the most part when he had time to throw. I liked how Ganz could move around the pocket and scramble for some yards. He was accurate too, but had some Favre in his veins. Sometimes Joe reminded me of a bobble head when he ran because his helmet looked two big for his neck & shoulders. And Zac had heavy bricks or cement in his shoes. Ahh, the good times... 1 Quote Link to comment
Landlord Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 Weren't something like 5 or 6 of those 11 INT's pick 6's? 3. Also per your recommendation I just watched all three interceptions of Taylor's from the championship game. Two of them he didn't have a single player within 4 yards, and the third I guess the pocket was kind of smaller but he still never got touched by anyone. There was another one that he threw right into the numbers of an OU defender that got dropped, too. I didn't watch every single play but on those, at least, he just made terrible decisions. But I digress too - I love Zac, I love Joe, and I couldn't pick one over the other. Quote Link to comment
TheKiD Posted December 31, 2014 Share Posted December 31, 2014 Why are we reminiscing over callahan years? It's damn near 2015 people... Quote Link to comment
alexhortdog95 Posted December 31, 2014 Author Share Posted December 31, 2014 I love this OP. Sums up my feelings exactly on the new era of offense. It terribly stunts the growth of the most important player on the team, the qb. Yes, it can make it easier for guys to succeed, but long term you'd be better off letting a guy learn and develop the mental side of the game. This spread style of offense is p**syfying the game of football right now. While it has moments of toughness - it lacks a certain physical toughness. Pistol: Spread: Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.