Landlord Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 He's 6 spots away from being a 5 star player, jftr. Quote Link to comment
Hoosker Posted January 15, 2017 Share Posted January 15, 2017 This is the type of game changer that we have needed. No one in the B1G west has this caliber of player Totally agree. Now we need to make damn sure he gets his touches, however that may be. Quote Link to comment
Xmas32 Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 This is the type of game changer that we have needed. No one in the B1G west has this caliber of player About the only guy that remotely pops to mind who played in the West is Alex Erickson from Whisky and I'm not sure how apt that comparison is. Quote Link to comment
Vince R. Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 This is the type of game changer that we have needed. No one in the B1G west has this caliber of player About the only guy that remotely pops to mind who played in the West is Alex Erickson from Whisky and I'm not sure how apt that comparison is. to be honest, not at all. 2 Quote Link to comment
I AM FOOT FOOT Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 He's 6 spots away from being a 5 star player, jftr.wasn't he a 5 star earlier this fall? Quote Link to comment
Xmas32 Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 This is the type of game changer that we have needed. No one in the B1G west has this caliber of player About the only guy that remotely pops to mind who played in the West is Alex Erickson from Whisky and I'm not sure how apt that comparison is. to be honest, not at all. Yeah, I was going through opponents in the West that had productive slottish WRs. Erickson was the only guy I could think of that had pretty good athleticism. Definite reach haha. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 16, 2017 Author Share Posted January 16, 2017 Down 21 spots to #62 Overall on Rivals. Quote Link to comment
BIGREDIOWAN Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Down 21 spots to #62 Overall on Rivals. Of course he is.......... 1 Quote Link to comment
Ratt Mhule Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Didnt he miss most of the year due to injury? If he would have played, he probably would have moved up. 1 Quote Link to comment
PaulCrewe Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Didnt he miss most of the year due to injury? If he would have played, he probably would have moved up. Tis true Quote Link to comment
Vince R. Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 This is the type of game changer that we have needed. No one in the B1G west has this caliber of player About the only guy that remotely pops to mind who played in the West is Alex Erickson from Whisky and I'm not sure how apt that comparison is. to be honest, not at all. Yeah, I was going through opponents in the West that had productive slottish WRs. Erickson was the only guy I could think of that had pretty good athleticism. Definite reach haha. Erickson is a great player though. I always liked him. Quote Link to comment
Hoosker Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Down 21 spots to #62 Overall on Rivals. Because of the flip? Quote Link to comment
Thanks_Tom RR Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Didnt he miss most of the year due to injury? If he would have played, he probably would have moved up. Tis true I get that if he doesn't play, it is hard to project him in college. However, Lindsey is not a late bloomer in HS and has shown out at numerous camps. These ratings are meant as a projection of his success and game-readiness at the college level. Are you telling me that because he did not play a few HS games, he will be adversely affected at the college level? My question is when did he get re-evaluated and what was that timeline in context of his flipped commitment? Quote Link to comment
broganreynik Posted January 16, 2017 Share Posted January 16, 2017 Didnt he miss most of the year due to injury? If he would have played, he probably would have moved up.Tis true I get that if he doesn't play, it is hard to project him in college. However, Lindsey is not a late bloomer in HS and has shown out at numerous camps. These ratings are meant as a projection of his success and game-readiness at the college level. Are you telling me that because he did not play a few HS games, he will be adversely affected at the college level? My question is when did he get re-evaluated and what was that timeline in context of his flipped commitment? I'm sure other players who did play were re-evaluated based on their seasons, then moved ahead of him. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.