The Republican Utopia

[teachercd]

1 hour ago, funhusker said:

I’m not religious person, but is this really necessary?

 

it was just in the last 24-48 hours that you felt the need to report a post that promoted anti-Asian sentiments.

 

What are your thoughts on Muslims snd Jews?  Are they all crazy?  I’m guessing you would report a person coming on here and calling all Muslims crazy after a terrorist attack, because you should.

 

I don’t see how this is different.

I guess if the post above yours was the chaser....your post was the shot!  Ha

[knapplc]

1 hour ago, funhusker said:

I’m not religious person, but is this really necessary?

 

it was just in the last 24-48 hours that you felt the need to report a post that promoted anti-Asian sentiments.

 

What are your thoughts on Muslims snd Jews?  Are they all crazy?  I’m guessing you would report a person coming on here and calling all Muslims crazy after a terrorist attack, because you should.

 

I don’t see how this is different.

 

When their spiritual leader tells them to do A), and they do B), I think that's worthy of being called out. 

[funhusker]

8 minutes ago, knapplc said:

 

When their spiritual leader tells them to do A), and they do B), I think that's worthy of being called out. 

So not “all” Christians then?
 

My family’s Church, the ELCA, is actually very proactive in the refugee community and are very open about their support for human rights and dignity being a priority over government laws.

 

There are a lot of Christians using the teachings of Jesus as motivation to make the world better.   
 

 

 

 

[knapplc]

Just now, funhusker said:

My family’s Church, the ELCA, is actually very proactive in the refugee community and are very open about their support for human rights and dignity being a priority over government laws.

 

There are a lot of Christians using the teachings of Jesus as motivation to make the world better.   

 

Yes.

[funhusker]

Just now, knapplc said:

 

Yes.

So using terms like “all” is probably a little extreme.  
 

Just sayin’

[knapplc]

You're not reading what I wrote:

 

9 hours ago, knapplc said:

All the right-wingers in Texas cheering this on.

 

  

9 hours ago, knapplc said:

Y'all Christians are a crazy breed, yo.

 

 

Pretty clearly talking about the Christians in Texas who are OK with this, or who elect these officials, and these officials who claim to be Christian. 

[funhusker]

6 minutes ago, knapplc said:

You're not reading what I wrote:

 

 

  

 

Pretty clearly talking about the Christians in Texas who are OK with this, or who elect these officials, and these officials who claim to be Christian. 

People Tweeting at players are gross.

 

Y’all Husker fans are a bunch of psychopaths...

[knapplc]

3 minutes ago, funhusker said:

People Tweeting at players are gross.

 

Y’all Husker fans are a bunch of psychopaths...

 

How should I edit that to make it better, so there's no confusion. 

[BigRedBuster]

1 hour ago, knapplc said:

Pretty clearly talking about the Christians in Texas who are OK with this, or who elect these officials, and these officials who claim to be Christian. 

That's not how it comes across.

[Moiraine]

16 hours ago, teachercd said:

I mean, you are basically saying fat guys can't be masculine and that masculine guys can't be smart and so on.

 

It would be like saying hot girls are not good at science. 

 

 

 

If your reading comprehension sucks, sure. 

[teachercd]

5 minutes ago, Moiraine said:

 

 

If your reading comprehension sucks, sure. 

That is sort of your go to come back

 

The old "if you(r) ____________________ sucks, sure"

 

I can appreciate it reusing a comeback over and over.

[Moiraine]

2 minutes ago, teachercd said:

That is sort of your go to come back

 

The old "if you(r) ____________________ sucks, sure"

 

I can appreciate it reusing a comeback over and over.

 

 

I like to be appreciated.

I made it clear to anyone with a couple brain cells to create fiction that I was assessing how someone is defining masculinity, not giving my own definition of it. But you like to troll.

[teachercd]

17 minutes ago, Moiraine said:

 

 

I like to be appreciated.

I made it clear to anyone with a couple brain cells to create fiction that I was assessing how someone is defining masculinity, not giving my own definition of it. But you like to troll.

Masculinity is like porn, I can't define it but I know what it is when I see it.

 

You sort of started a topic that 3 or 4 posters also questioned because for the most part it just didn't make sense.  Not a big deal, 99% of the posts here don't make sense.  You want a definition of something that for the most part is different to almost everyone.  What you really wanted was for posters to agree that our military doesn't need what your definition of masculinity is, which for some reason seems to be a big dumb oafish man.

 

You were questioned on it and did your best to explain it away but, which again is fair, but then you went to the "I would rather have a fat genius" bit, because in your mind, fat smart guys can't be masculine, I guess.

 

@BigRedBuster and @B.B. Hemingway and @RedDenver all pretty much had no idea what you were getting at, I joked about you making stereotypes because that is what you were doing, it is okay, we all get it.  You did not get trolled.  Everyone tried explaining why your thoughts were off, but you did not want to listen.  Again, not the end of the world.

 

Call it a generalization instead of a stereo type, that works.

[TGHusker]

14 minutes ago, teachercd said:

Masculinity is like porn, I can't define it but I know what it is when I see it.

 

You sort of started a topic that 3 or 4 posters also questioned because for the most part it just didn't make sense.  Not a big deal, 99% of the posts here don't make sense.  You want a definition of something that for the most part is different to almost everyone.  What you really wanted was for posters to agree that our military doesn't need what your definition of masculinity is, which for some reason seems to be a big dumb oafish man.

 

You were questioned on it and did your best to explain it away but, which again is fair, but then you went to the "I would rather have a fat genius" bit, because in your mind, fat smart guys can't be masculine, I guess.

 

@BigRedBuster and @B.B. Hemingway and @RedDenver all pretty much had no idea what you were getting at, I joked about you making stereotypes because that is what you were doing, it is okay, we all get it.  You did not get trolled.  Everyone tried explaining why your thoughts were off, but you did not want to listen.  Again, not the end of the world.

 

Call it a generalization instead of a stereo type, that works.

[teachercd]

2 minutes ago, TGHusker said:

Ha!  Come on!

 

I mean, if that many posters didn't get the point it seems like it is not a reading comprehension issue.