junior4949 Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 What's wrong with Erik Chinander? Quote Link to comment
husker ponsler Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 Please stop with UCF coaches Quote Link to comment
junior4949 Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 If Frost is the next coach, why wouldn't he bring his DC with him? Quote Link to comment
ColoradoHusk Posted October 10, 2017 Author Share Posted October 10, 2017 2 minutes ago, junior4949 said: If Frost is the next coach, why wouldn't he bring his DC with him? I am sure he would try to bring his DC with him, but many think that UCF would try to promote the current DC to Head Coach if Frost left for another school. Quote Link to comment
ColoradoHusk Posted October 10, 2017 Author Share Posted October 10, 2017 Regarding my original post on the topic, I was pretty drunk and disappointed during the 4th quarter of the Wisconsin game, but the original question is still valid. After the Rutgers and Illinois games, there were many posts saying "If Riley is fired and a new coach is brought in, I hope that Diaco and some of the other defensive staff is retained". I am still not sold on Diaco, as the D seems to be successful against really bad offenses, but really struggles with any good offense. Quote Link to comment
runningblind Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 On 10/9/2017 at 0:17 PM, Whistlepig said: Sure keep him we need someone to fill in as head coach after we lose 59-6 to tOSU 59-6 is a 6 point improvement my friend. Program on the uptick right there. Quote Link to comment
olddominionhusker Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 On 10/8/2017 at 6:00 PM, Nebhawk said: For the record, I think the verdict is out on Diaco. I don't know if we can judge him off this season. I would like to see him in about 3 year with better players, and players recruited to play in this defense. Maybe even with Frost and his system. Don't see that happening, but I don't know if we can judge him yet. Kind of where I am. I think the defense has issues, but I also realize it's the first year of a new system and they at least look better then last year. However, I am certainly not optimistic enough about Diaco or his defense to stipulate that the new coach has to retain them. If they want to fine but not as a condition. Quote Link to comment
olddominionhusker Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 On 10/9/2017 at 2:10 PM, brophog said: I believe Taylor had 1 run in the first half that went for less than 4 yds, and had long runs of 30 and 75. A lot of the first half appearing close was a mirage caused by a s#!t ton of early penalties in Wisc that killed their drives. They were still moving the ball fairly consistently and well even if they didn't break open the scoring until the second half. Quote Link to comment
Whistlepig Posted October 10, 2017 Share Posted October 10, 2017 1 hour ago, runningblind said: 59-6 is a 6 point improvement my friend. Program on the uptick right there. we are playing at home Quote Link to comment
The Dude Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 On 10/9/2017 at 0:52 PM, husker_fan_from_sweden said: Diaco has earned his keep and was a huge upgrade over Bumblin' Banker. Then why is the defense worse? Quote Link to comment
husker_fan_from_sweden Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 37 minutes ago, The Dude said: Then why is the defense worse? Points scored? When has a Diaco coached defense ever allowed a 62 burger? I recall Banker defenses allowed seemingly countless first downs on 1st down. At least Diaco defenses go to 2nd and 3rd. Quote Link to comment
suh_fan93 Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 When it was all said and done Nebraska finished 30th in total defense under Banker last season. That got him fired. Diaco's unit is currently ranked 43rd. Quote Link to comment
brophog Posted October 11, 2017 Share Posted October 11, 2017 6 hours ago, olddominionhusker said: A lot of the first half appearing close was a mirage caused by a s#!t ton of early penalties in Wisc that killed their drives. They were still moving the ball fairly consistently and well even if they didn't break open the scoring until the second half. Yeah, it put them in long down and distance that led to a lot of incompletions, and that really prevented them from playing like they wanted. In this regard, I don't like what I heard in Diaco's press conference. He seems to present this as a 19 minute game, citing the score at 1:20 in the first half ( the big TD run) and near the third quarter as examples of acceptable score differentials. He focuses on the final three drives where Wisconsin ran the ball up and down the field, rather than the entire game. I can understand tryin to be positive to the media and presenting this as a correctable situation, especially with such a dominant opponent coming to town, but I hope privately he realizes this started well before the second half. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.