** 2019 Opponent Previews : Minnesota (Game 7) **

[Undone]

For as much as is being said about their receivers, they only threw for 155 yards against Illinois but rushed for 332 for a total of 487 yards of offense. They played a pretty complete game last week against the Illini.

 

Because of our injuries on offense I'd say we're definitely the underdog. 

 

Our lack of a pass rusher will probably be glaringly obvious in this game unless Chinander dials up some plays where he blitzes when they don't think we are and then fakes the blitz when we're showing it. He needs to get better at this.

[RedSavage]

16 minutes ago, suh_fan93 said:

 

Was Davis on there last week?  Just wondering if he's still being held out this week if there's no changes

[Nebfanatic]

This game is alot like last week in terms of importance. Really need to win this one to give us hope we can still win the West. If we can get through this week with a W and head into the bye week with 1 conference loss hopefully that can give the team a little extra confidence that the goals are still achievable

[UniversalMartin]

What's the status on Pickering?

[Nebfanatic]

4 minutes ago, UniversalMartin said:

What's the status on Pickering?

How many licks does it take to get to the center of a tootsie pop?

[BigRedBuster]

32 minutes ago, Undone said:

For as much as is being said about their receivers, they only threw for 155 yards against Illinois but rushed for 332 for a total of 487 yards of offense. They played a pretty complete game last week against the Illini.

 

Because of our injuries on offense I'd say we're definitely the underdog. 

 

Our lack of a pass rusher will probably be glaringly obvious in this game unless Chinander dials up some plays where he blitzes when they don't think we are and then fakes the blitz when we're showing it. He needs to get better at this.

I'm seeing a lot of talk about their line being "big".  But, not a lot about them being really good.  Nebraska has gone through periods here we have a really big tackle only to find they aren't very mobile.  They have allowed 16 sacks on Morgan through 5 games (3+ per game).  And...again...they really haven't played any good teams.

 

This might be a game where we can get to the QB.

[hskrfan4life]

37 minutes ago, Undone said:

For as much as is being said about their receivers, they only threw for 155 yards against Illinois but rushed for 332 for a total of 487 yards of offense. They played a pretty complete game last week against the Illini.

 

Because of our injuries on offense I'd say we're definitely the underdog. 

 

Our lack of a pass rusher will probably be glaringly obvious in this game unless Chinander dials up some plays where he blitzes when they don't think we are and then fakes the blitz when we're showing it. He needs to get better at this.

And still had two turnovers

[BigRedBuster]

I looked up there game stats:

 

SDSU - 2 sacks

Fresno - 4 sacks

Georgia Southern - 5 sacks  

Purdue - 4 sacks

Illinois - 1 sack

 

Their pass pro does seem suspect.  Maybe they didn't throw very much against Illinois because they new they couldn't protect the QB.

 

 

[hskrfan4life]

I expect Khalil do be going off this weekend. Especially since he got suspended.

[Husker in WI]

4 minutes ago, BigRedBuster said:

I'm seeing a lot of talk about their line being "big".  But, not a lot about them being really good.  Nebraska has gone through periods here we have a really big tackle only to find they aren't very mobile.  They have allowed 16 sacks on Morgan through 5 games (3+ per game).  And...again...they really haven't played any good teams.

 

This might be a game where we can get to the QB.

 

I think Tuoti's influence with more twists and stunts will be big. I'm sure they've improved a lot since week 1, but SDSU just ran guys around the RG/RT and got a lot of pressure. I'm not even sure we need heavy blitzes or a good edge rusher, although it would be nice to see Ace make some plays. Last week he had a few where we was quick off the ball, but either didn't trust his speed or was afraid of losing the rush lane and just throttled down and engaged the tackle.

[everybody knows my name]

Minnesota perspective here.  Don't count on the Oline to do you any favors.  It hasn't lived up to preseason expectations, but that's largely due to two young players learning on the job.  I'm not sugar-coating the situation.  The line has improved substantially in-season and played its best game so far against the Illini.

[BowedButNotBeaten]

Dress warm if you're coming. Kickoff temp will be around 34 degrees with significant wind. If there's precipitation, and there's a 40% chance there will be, pray that the temperature dips enough to make it snow instead of a freezing drizzle.

 

The weather will have an effect, but I'm not sure in favor of whom. Last week, Tanner Morgan struggled a bit in the dampness and the Gopher receivers had some issues holding onto the ball. Thankfully, the somnolent running attack answered with vigor.

 

Any word on Martinez or Vedral? I suspect Frost will play it close to the vest all week.

[Husker in WI]

3 minutes ago, BowedButNotBeaten said:

Any word on Martinez or Vedral? I suspect Frost will play it close to the vest all week.

 

I doubt we hear anything until game time honestly. Martinez didn't practice today, but I don't think anyone expected him to whether he plays this week or not.

[Mavric]

4 minutes ago, BowedButNotBeaten said:

Any word on Martinez or Vedral? I suspect Frost will play it close to the vest all week.

 

With how Martinez looked on the sideline after being in the tent, I'd be shocked if he plays this week.

[10_point_buck]

Early forecast for the Twin Cities is cold, windy and maybe wet. Way too early to know if it will be wet or not, but the cold and windy are almost a given from what I have seen so far in the forecast models.  Wind will be similar to the game Saturday vs Northwestern, but I have no clue on how the stadium in MN is with wind as some are worse than others. (Hinze Field)