nic Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 3 hours ago, NM11046 said: No they didn't. You need to read other sources outside of Fox News about what is happening in that lab. You are amplifying a lie. https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/10/18/business/bu-calls-report-that-it-created-more-dangerous-covid-strain-false-inaccurate/ https://www.wgbh.org/news/local-news/2022/10/19/boston-university-defends-covid-19-research-calling-criticism-inaccurate https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2022/oct/20/instagram-posts/claim-boston-university-created-covid-19-strain-80/ https://apnews.com/article/fact-check-pandemic-covid-omicron-health-science-365183938782 https://www.wbur.org/news/2022/10/18/bu-disputes-reports-it-created-a-potentially-dangerous-pathogen https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2022/10/18/new-lab-made-covid-19-coronavirus-at-boston-university-raises-questions/?sh=63e6ae752a4f Cool. They better not. Link to comment
NebraskaHarry Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 It shouldn't surprise anyone that "Republicans" would push this synthetic covid virus, made in a lab BS. Always looking for a boogeyman. Frankly surprised they havent blames Hilary or Hunter Biden on its origin yet. Or maybe they have, I dont know. They could be blaming the Easter Bunny for all I know. Hard to keep track with their excuses. 2 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 1 hour ago, Scarlet said: Your guys pinned tweet says he still believes Covid 19 began in the Wuhan wet market Hard to take him seriously with that still up. 1 Link to comment
Jason Sitoke Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 18 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: Your guys pinned tweet says he still believes Covid 19 began in the Wuhan wet market Hard to take him seriously with that still up. It's still one of the more prevailing theories, is it not? 2 Link to comment
Scarlet Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 22 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: Your guys pinned tweet says he still believes Covid 19 began in the Wuhan wet market Hard to take him seriously with that still up. Ummm...this has actually gone through the peer review process unlike the garbage you posted. https://newsroom.ucla.edu/releases/covid-tied-to-wildlife-sales-at-wuhan-market Quote An international team of researchers reports today that live animals sold at the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in Wuhan, China, were the likely source of the COVID-19 pandemic that has claimed 6.4 million lives since it began nearly three years ago. “Rigorously combining all available evidence surrounding the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 clearly demonstrates that the virus jumped at least twice from animals to humans at the Huanan market,” said Dr. Marc Suchard, a UCLA Fielding School of Public Health professor of biostatistics. “Identifying multiple transmission events finally puts to rest a single origin from elsewhere.” Quote The publications, which have since gone through peer review and include additional analyses and conclusions, virtually eliminate alternative scenarios that have been suggested as origins of the pandemic Quote We had been gathering data collected from across Wuhan’s wet markets…which put our team in the right place at the right time to document the wild animals sold in these markets in the lead up to the pandemic https://www.ox.ac.uk/news/science-blog/wet-market-sources-covid-19-bats-and-pangolins-have-alibi https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2022/07/26/health/wuhan-market-covid-19/index.html https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abp8715 https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2022/origins-of-sars-cov-2 Ok shoot. Post your one off Taiwanese study that hasn't been peered reviewed but is not surprisingly being tauted by right-wing websites. If it turns out Covid started somewhere other than the wet market then so be it. But the reason you're posting the garbage study you did is so obvious and tired. 1 3 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 23 minutes ago, Jason Sitoke said: It's still one of the more prevailing theories, is it not? It looks like it still is for some. 1 Link to comment
Jason Sitoke Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 Just now, Archy1221 said: It looks like it still is for some. So why is it ‘hard to take seriously’? 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 22 minutes ago, Scarlet said: But the reason you're posting the garbage study you did is so obvious and tired. Believe it or don’t believe it. It doesn’t matter to me. I’m currently skeptical of it, but it’s worth reading and following since patient zero still hasn’t been found. Im sorry that people being scientifically inquisitive is tiring for you. 1 Link to comment
Jason Sitoke Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 2 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: Believe it or don’t believe it. It doesn’t matter to me. I’m currently skeptical of it, but it’s worth reading and following since patient zero still hasn’t been found. Im sorry that people being scientifically inquisitive is tiring for you. What specifically in the data are you skeptical of? At what point in the logical progression of the tweets do you find yourself differing with the author? 2 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 24 minutes ago, Jason Sitoke said: So why is it ‘hard to take seriously’? 1) to my current knowledge, scientists haven’t traced a Wuhan animal yet to Covid 19 transmission. If I’m wrong please let me know. 2). The timeline bantered around doesn’t fit that narrative 3) I’ll have to find this again, but sourcing has gone back to Sept 2019 though sample destruction has made this hard nail down exactly 4). China wants us all to believe the wet market story. (Or the NC lab theory). China isn’t very trustworthy. 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 9 hours ago, Archy1221 said: Pretty interesting thread. 1 2 Link to comment
Jason Sitoke Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 17 minutes ago, Archy1221 said: 1) to my current knowledge, scientists haven’t traced a Wuhan animal yet to Covid 19 transmission. If I’m wrong please let me know. 2). The timeline bantered around doesn’t fit that narrative 3) I’ll have to find this again, but sourcing has gone back to Sept 2019 though sample destruction has made this hard nail down exactly 4). China wants us all to believe the met market story. (Or the NC lab theory). China isn’t very trustworthy. 1). Appeal to Ignorance 2). ‘Narrative bantered around’? 3). Appeal to Ignorance 4) Tu Quoque It is a theory, which means it’s not proven. But it is plausible, not laughably inaccurate…which you seem to be indicating. 1 Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 3 minutes ago, Jason Sitoke said: 1). Appeal to Ignorance—correct. The wet market theory appeals to ignorance 2). ‘Narrative bantered around’?—-Sept is earlier than Dec in the calendar 3). Appeal to Ignorance—-Your data for this is where 4) Tu Quoque—not really into Latin, or the hypocrisy insinuation 1 Link to comment
commando Posted October 21, 2022 Share Posted October 21, 2022 it all boils down to trump said it so his followers believe that narrative no matter what anyone says. 4 Link to comment
Recommended Posts