RedDenver Posted November 29, 2022 Author Share Posted November 29, 2022 3 hours ago, RedDenver said: There's no reason to believe either. However, Musk has a vested interest in shaping the narrative. Also keep in mind Musk has been known to make things up: 1 Link to comment
Cdog923 Posted November 29, 2022 Share Posted November 29, 2022 It still will forever amaze me how many people have a fundamental misunderstanding of the phrase "freedom of speech". 2 Link to comment
Guy Chamberlin Posted November 29, 2022 Share Posted November 29, 2022 Again, Elon Musk used his first 24 hours as the owner of Twitter to promote the entirely unfounded theory that Paul Pelosi was attacked in a gay lover's spat, and not in a home invasion by a political adversary. That's his right. I guess. But it's really weird to claim it as a victory for free speech. 2 2 Link to comment
nic Posted December 1, 2022 Share Posted December 1, 2022 I agree with Warren, and it seems that Elon may have already been selective with accounts as alleged with his Ex Amber. Maybe Elon pooped in her bed first and he doesn’t want it to get out. I also believe that Twitter was already banning folks in a biased way. Maybe we traded one bias for another. Link to comment
funhusker Posted December 1, 2022 Share Posted December 1, 2022 10 minutes ago, nic said: I agree with Warren, and it seems that Elon may have already been selective with accounts as alleged with his Ex Amber. Maybe Elon pooped in her bed first and he doesn’t want it to get out. I also believe that Twitter was already banning folks in a biased way. Maybe we traded one bias for another. I agree with Jim. It's Elon's company. If he wants to turn it into a s#!t hole and suffer whatever happens, more power to him... And if it turns into a cesspool of threats of violence and conspiracies and Apple and Google decide to not put it on their platforms, that's also their decision. Discrimination based on idiocy is sadly not outlawed by the Constitution. 2 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted December 1, 2022 Share Posted December 1, 2022 3 hours ago, funhusker said: I agree with Jim. It's Elon's company. If he wants to turn it into a s#!t hole and suffer whatever happens, more power to him... And if it turns into a cesspool of threats of violence and conspiracies and Apple and Google decide to not put it on their platforms, that's also their decision. Discrimination based on idiocy is sadly not outlawed by the Constitution. He does have the right to do what he wants with the company. Apple has the right to do what they want. But, some seem to think apple should be punished by the government just because they might decide not to offer the app in their App Store. Which, was a lie that Elon pushed. 4 1 Link to comment
BigRedBuster Posted December 2, 2022 Share Posted December 2, 2022 What???? I thought he was all about free speech. Link to comment
Archy1221 Posted December 2, 2022 Share Posted December 2, 2022 1 hour ago, BigRedBuster said: What???? I thought he was all about free speech. You don’t really follow this much do you? 1 Link to comment
commando Posted December 2, 2022 Share Posted December 2, 2022 2 hours ago, BigRedBuster said: What???? I thought he was all about free speech. FWIW....the swastika wasn't ye's last post. Ye was banned right after he posted a fat Elon picture 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts