Stumpy1 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 If a school has open scholarships from the previous year, the early enrollees will take up those scholarships but still count against the current years numbers. So if it still doesn't matter if USC has open schollies from the previous year, the early enrollees still count against this years class. They can take no more then 15 kids and that is including the early enrollees that use last years scholarships. But this doesn't work out with them signing 16 last year and already having 18 verbals this year. Which says that they are not following the punishment handed down to them by the NCAA on the 15 a year. Quote Link to comment
FrankWheeler Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 If a school has open scholarships from the previous year, the early enrollees will take up those scholarships but still count against the current years numbers. So if it still doesn't matter if USC has open schollies from the previous year, the early enrollees still count against this years class. They can take no more then 15 kids and that is including the early enrollees that use last years scholarships. But this doesn't work out with them signing 16 last year and already having 18 verbals this year. Which says that they are not following the punishment handed down to them by the NCAA on the 15 a year. Sorry I edited, I did some more research. They signed 17 last year with 5 of them being early enrollees that counted towards the previous year limit. 12 of them counted for 2012, so they still have 3 available. Quote Link to comment
EZ-E Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Huh. This is a new one on me. Good work Dylan and company. Quote Link to comment
Stumpy1 Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 They are going off of 15 scholarships a year and not 15 kids a year. That makes since on how they are doing it. The SEC has the 25 a year rule but it does not go off of scholarships instead the number of kids. Quote Link to comment
RedDenver Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 One additional complication is that school's are NOT limited by NCAA in how many kids they sign in Feb. (although some conferences have rules about that like the SEC's recent rules). So, depending on P12 rules, USC can sign as many as they want as long as they're at 15 or less on schollie come fall. Quote Link to comment
scotlandhusker Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 https://twitter.com/...131153766604800 https://twitter.com/...131196355563520 Quote Link to comment
RedRedJarvisRedwine Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 If a school has open scholarships from the previous year, the early enrollees will take up those scholarships but still count against the current years numbers. So if it still doesn't matter if USC has open schollies from the previous year, the early enrollees still count against this years class. They can take no more then 15 kids and that is including the early enrollees that use last years scholarships. But this doesn't work out with them signing 16 last year and already having 18 verbals this year. Which says that they are not following the punishment handed down to them by the NCAA on the 15 a year. I'm not sure the wording of their punishment ever says "15 per year"..... I believe it's more worded towards the loss of 10 scholarships per year for 3 years! Just like our only concern is 85. Their only concern is 75! Quote Link to comment
Lyons in the Sea of Red. Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 https://twitter.com/...131153766604800 https://twitter.com/...131196355563520 He gone Quote Link to comment
ADS Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 https://twitter.com/...131153766604800 https://twitter.com/...131196355563520 Whats it say? Quote Link to comment
zeWilbur Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 https://twitter.com/...131153766604800 https://twitter.com/...131196355563520 Whats it say? FWIW: He doesn't say top what... "@S_Morris12 how long do you think that last Michigan spot is going to be open ? There in my top" @pwillisjr3 we got 2-3 spots left... I'll messaged you coaches number @S_Morris12 ok cause if there isnt any left i didnt want to wste a visit or anything Quote Link to comment
FrankWheeler Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 This is a good article that discusses USC recruiting, where they are and where they are going. They are limited to giving 15 scholarships a year and 75 total. Both limitations are in place. http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/usc-numbers-lane-kiffin-successfully-staves-off-scholarship-213753439.html Quote Link to comment
huskerhill Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Priest asked a michigan commit how long till they were all full because priest said there one of his top teams. Guy responded that they have 2-3 spots remaining and that he would give priest some coaches numbers. Priest then responds by saying he didn't want to waste an official visit if they were already full. Quote Link to comment
HuskerinLibertyMO Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Okay, so if I'm following this correctly... He has Michigan in his top (whatever) but he has to ask another player how many spots are left and the other player will get him the coaches' number. It doesn't sound to me like Michigan is recruiting him too hard. Wouldn't that be the type of info a highly sought recruit would already know from the coaches? Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but he doesn't even have the coaches phone number to call himself? Then he says he just doesn't want to waste an official. Doesn't seem like there's a lot of hot interest from either side. Of course what do I know, it's been a long time since I was a 17-18 year old. 1 Quote Link to comment
RedDenver Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Okay, so if I'm following this correctly... He has Michigan in his top (whatever) but he has to ask another player how many spots are left and the other player will get him the coaches' number. It doesn't sound to me like Michigan is recruiting him too hard. Wouldn't that be the type of info a highly sought recruit would already know from the coaches? Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but he doesn't even have the coaches phone number to call himself? Then he says he just doesn't want to waste an official. Doesn't seem like there's a lot of hot interest from either side. Of course what do I know, it's been a long time since I was a 17-18 year old. You have the parties reversed. Priest tells another kid the coaches' numbers. Quote Link to comment
FrankWheeler Posted July 31, 2012 Share Posted July 31, 2012 Okay, so if I'm following this correctly... He has Michigan in his top (whatever) but he has to ask another player how many spots are left and the other player will get him the coaches' number. It doesn't sound to me like Michigan is recruiting him too hard. Wouldn't that be the type of info a highly sought recruit would already know from the coaches? Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but he doesn't even have the coaches phone number to call himself? Then he says he just doesn't want to waste an official. Doesn't seem like there's a lot of hot interest from either side. Of course what do I know, it's been a long time since I was a 17-18 year old. You have the parties reversed. Priest tells another kid the coaches' numbers. Nope, he had it right... Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.