Mavric Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Mike Schaefer @mikejschaefer 1h1 hour ago My early nomination for favorite buzz word from new Nebraska defensive staff: Disruptive. Heard it several times from several assistants. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 9, 2015 Author Share Posted January 9, 2015 World-Herald Big Red @OWHbigred 40m40 minutes ago Here's part of #Husker defensive coordinator Mark Banker's Q&A from today's press conference: http://bit.ly/1FwoqIO Quote Link to comment
NebraskaHarry Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Well if they can disguise a blitz, then we're already further along defensively than we have been. 1 Quote Link to comment
gobiggergoredder Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Well if they can disguise a blitz, then we're already further along defensively than we have been. What is this 'Blitz' you speak of? 1 Quote Link to comment
alwayshusking Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Samuel McKewon @swmckewonOWH · 1h1 hour ago Banker's 4-3 D is very similar to Michigan State. The difference? "The Jimmies and Joes they were working with and we were working with." Quote Link to comment
Elf Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Well if they can disguise a blitz, then we're already further along defensively than we have been. Hahahaha! So true. I'd love it if we saw more DL stunts as well. Good stunts really mess with the O Line. Quote Link to comment
Mavric Posted January 9, 2015 Author Share Posted January 9, 2015 Steven M. Sipple @HuskerExtraSip 5m5 minutes ago Mike Riley says D.C. Mark Banker "pretty much has autonomy on defense. I'll throw in whatever two cents I have ..." #Huskers Quote Link to comment
southernoregonhusker Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Blitz? I remember two years ago when we blitzed a lot during the second half of the season. Worked really well. Then the "Defensive Guru" stopped blitzing and we didn't look so good. Weird Quote Link to comment
Stumpy1 Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Samuel McKewon @swmckewonOWH · 1h1 hour ago Banker's 4-3 D is very similar to Michigan State. The difference? "The Jimmies and Joes they were working with and we were working with." wood Quote Link to comment
StPaulHusker Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Samuel McKewon @swmckewonOWH · 1h1 hour ago Banker's 4-3 D is very similar to Michigan State. The difference? "The Jimmies and Joes they were working with and we were working with." For now this is all I need to hear. Quote Link to comment
Count 'Bility Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 I'm so excited to hear this. it may make us a bit more vulnerable in the secondary, but frankly that's fine. You can win giving up 300 yards in the air. If youre giving up 300 on the ground (or in our case, 400 to one guy in 2 quarters), your f'd. Even before playing Florida and the fun and gun in '95, Charlie McBride said straight up gotta stop the run first and foremost. At least we wont be playing two deep anymore to keep from giving up that vaunted 40 yard TD pass to Wisconsin once a game. What this quarters, man free stuff will allow is for much simpler responsibilities in coverage, and more eyes on the qb and run game. Like it says. Simpler. Faster. Even our great defenses of the 90's gave up handfuls of chunk yardage and huge pass plays each game. But we didnt sit back with lack of aggression and let the offense dictate to us up and down the field all day either. They had to work and grind and pick their way to get those big plays, and usually when they did, it was too late. Quote Link to comment
RedRedJarvisRedwine Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 After watching more college football this year than I have most years and almost every bowl game, I'm convinced that nobody in college football plays defense anymore. So with that in mind lets get the offense wired right and take our chances on D. Quote Link to comment
B.B. Hemingway Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 The philosophy of the previous defensive staff was making a team go on 12-14 play drives, and betting that the opponent makes a mistake within those number of plays.... So, yeah, aggression will be a nice change. Quote Link to comment
junior4949 Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Bend but don't break, what a pathetic way to play defense. 1 Quote Link to comment
MichiganDad3 Posted January 9, 2015 Share Posted January 9, 2015 Bend but don't break, what a pathetic way to play defense. I hated the bend but don't break philosophy with a passion unknown to most men. Make the offense, and especially the QB uncomfortable. Get the QB thinking about getting hit again. Force quick throws, throws into coverage. Force interceptions and fumbles. I have re-watched the 1995 NC game against Florida one a year for the past several years just so I don't forget how beautiful an attacking Husker dense can be. Terrel Farley was a magnificent beast. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.